Last night was the big throwdown (which sadly occurred at the same time as one of the greatest college basketball games of recent memory), and there weren’t really as many sparks as you might have expected. Sure, Stewart got in some good shots, but, in the end, Jim Cramer is not his target, just a straw man there for Stewart to yell at.The best part of the interview was that Stewart did not fall back on his usual technique when conducting one of his more serious interviews, which is to make a good point and then make a goofy joke which lets the person he is interviewing off the hook. His jokes were all sharp, pointed, and spot on. But his real target should be the head of CNBC, or CEOs like Dick Fuld or John Thain. Stewart’s point that CNBC should serve as more of a watchdog is excellent, but Cramer mostly agrees with him. In fact, Cramer seems to agree with most everything Stewart is saying-CNBC should try to hold CEOs to the fire, and the network did encourage this attitude of making fast money on the markets at the expense of long-term investors, but Jim Cramer is not the man who should have to come on The Daily Show and answer for these sins. That part is a little unfair. See for yourself, here.
Tags
advertisement
More for You
-
14 images of badass women who destroyed stereotypes and inspired future generations
These trailblazers redefined what a woman could be.
Throughout history, women have stood up and fought to break down barriers imposed on them from stereotypes and societal expectations. The trailblazers in these photos made history and redefined what a woman could be. In doing so, they paved the way for future generations to stand up and continue to fight for equality.
-
Why mass shootings spawn conspiracy theories
Mass shootings and conspiracy theories have a long history.
While conspiracy theories are not limited to any topic, there is one type of event that seems particularly likely to spark them: mass shootings, typically defined as attacks in which a shooter kills at least four other people.
When one person kills many others in a single incident, particularly when it seems random, people naturally seek out answers for why the tragedy happened. After all, if a mass shooting is random, anyone can be a target.
Pointing to some nefarious plan by a powerful group – such as the government – can be more comforting than the idea that the attack was the result of a disturbed or mentally ill individual who obtained a firearm legally.
advertisement

