Why Are Poor Students in London Doing So Much Better Than Almost Everyone Else?

For students and teachers, the rewards of diversity outweigh the challenges. #projectliteracy

A new report says that migrant aspiration is a big reason London’s classrooms are so successful. Image of Open Generation London via Flickr user Migrants' Rights Network (cc).

It’s called the “London effect” in educational circles. Since the mid-1990s, schools in the English capital have seen continuous improvements, making the city an educational success story for the most unlikely segment of British society: poorer children, in particular those with ethnic minority backgrounds.

Pupils from more disadvantaged backgrounds have, as a whole, racked up a dramatic increase in their academic performance over the past two decades, according to research conducted jointly by the Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion at the London School of Economics and the Institute for Fiscal Studies.

In 2002, 22 percent of children who were receiving free school meals—a program designed for poorer students—obtained grades between C and A* (the highest possible grade, comparable to an A+ in the United States) for math and English. Fast-forward to 2013, when 48 percent of children in the free-meals program achieved these results. And the numbers keep improving. On the other hand, gains were much smaller outside London, where the figures jumped from 17 percent to 26 percent in the same time period.

“These results are not down to a single policy or factor, but a gradual improvement of schools since the 1990s,” says Luke Sibieta, a program director at the Institute for Fiscal Studies and one of the authors of the recently released report.

These improvements entail many transformations, large and small: more effective school inspections, local leadership programs, teacher recruitment schemes like Teach First—which places top graduates in challenging schools—and efforts like the Literacy Hour, an intensive daily hour of reading and writing lessons first introduced to primary school students in the 1990s. But many researchers also believe that London’s educational triumph is powered by a less tangible factor: migrant aspiration.

Home to 8.5 million people speaking more than 300 languages, London has been shaped and defined by the flow of migration, and the United Kingdom’s economic powerhouse is almost synonymous with ethnic and linguistic diversity. Many observers might assume that this diversity would hobble the learning process, but according to the researchers, it’s one of the most important reasons why London pupils are more successful than ever.

“London has always been a very diverse city, and diversity is still a big challenge for London schools. But the rewards of diversity are bigger than its challenges,” Sibieta explains.

“In the last five to ten years, ethnic diversity in my school increased dramatically. Our school has never been as ethnically diverse as it is now,” says Kevin Wilson, head teacher of All Saints Catholic School in the borough of Barking and Dagenham, one of London’s most deprived areas.

“It used to be that a working-class boy from a minority background was typically under the risk of doing poorly at school. But in the last years, we pretty much eliminated that.”

Wilson adds, “Aspirations are very high among the families of children with migration backgrounds. That sort of drive really helps them to thrive.”

According to another research report, published by the University of Bristol in 2014, ethnic minority pupils have much higher levels of aspiration, ambition, and engagement compared with other students. When such an educational drive is fostered in a supportive yet competitive environment, the positive results can snowball. Young London residents also have the advantage of higher levels of connectivity, just one of the benefits of being in a large city brimming with opportunities.

“Having exposure to free museums, art, and science activities, as well as role models of all different backgrounds, really makes a difference about what children think they can achieve,” Wilson notes.

The upshot is that many young Londoners have a head start when it comes to confidence in their abilities.

“Over the years, London schools have developed a ‘no excuses’ culture in education. There are very high expectations from all the students, no matter what their backgrounds are,” Sibieta says.

“This will likely mean most of these children from poorer backgrounds will experience upward social mobility and get good jobs in their lifetimes—which is great,” he adds.

“But now the challenge is to make sure London isn’t the only place where this happens.”

via Honor Africans / Twitter

The problem with American Sign Language (ASL) is that over 500,000 people in the U.S. use it, but the country has over 330 million people.

So for those with hearing loss, the chances of coming into contact with someone who uses the language are rare. Especially outside of the deaf community.

Keep Reading Show less

Looking back, the year 1995 seems like such an innocent time. America was in the midst of its longest streak of peace and prosperity. September 11, 2001 was six years away, and the internet didn't seem like much more than a passing fad.

Twenty-four years ago, 18 million U.S. homes had modem-equipped computers, 7 million more than the year before. Most logged in through America Online where they got their email or communicated with random strangers in chat rooms.

According to a Pew Research study that year, only 32% of those who go online say they would miss it "a lot" if no longer available.

Imagine what those poll numbers would look like if the question was asked today.

RELATED: Bill and Melinda Gates had a surprising answer when asked about a 70 percent tax on the wealthiest Americans

"Few see online activities as essential to them, and no single online feature, with the exception of E-Mail, is used with any regularity," the Pew article said. "Consumers have yet to begin purchasing goods and services online, and there is little indication that online news features are changing traditional news consumption patterns."

"Late Night" host David Letterman had Microsoft founder and, at that time the richest man in the world, on his show for an interview in '95 to discuss the "the big new thing."

During the interview Letterman chided Gates about the usefulness of the new technology, comparing it to radio and tape recorders.

Gates seems excited by the internet because it will soon allow people to listen to a baseball game on their computer. To which Letterman smugly replies, "Does radio ring a bell?" to laughter from the crowd.

But Gates presses Letterman saying that the new technology allows you to listen to the game "whenever you want," to which Letterman responds, "Do tape recorders ring a bell?"

Gates then tells Letterman he can keep up with the latest in his favorite hobbies such as cigar smoking or race cars through the internet. Letterman shuts him down saying that he reads about his interests in magazines.

RELATED: Bill Gates has five books he thinks you should read this summer.

The discussion ends with the two laughing over meeting like-minded people in "troubled loner chat room on the internet."

The clip brings to mind a 1994 segment on "The Today Show" where host Bryant Gumbel and Katie Couric have a similar discussion.

"What is internet anyway?" an exasperated Gumball asks. "What do you write to it like mail?"

"It's a computer billboard but it's nationwide and it's several universities all joined together and it's getting bigger and bigger all the time," a producer explains from off-stage.

Photo by Li-An Lim on Unsplash

The future generations will have to live on this Earth for years to come, and, not surprisingly, they're very concerned about the fate of our planet. We've seen a rise in youth activists, such as Greta Thunberg, who are raising awareness for climate change. A recent survey indicates that those efforts are working, as more and more Americans (especially young Americans) feel concerned about climate change.

A new CBS News poll found that 70% of Americans between 18 and 29 feel climate change is a crisis or a serious problem, while 58% of Americans over the age of 65 share those beliefs. Additionally, younger generations are more likely to feel like it's their personal responsibility to address climate change, as well as think that transitioning to 100% renewable energy is viable. Overall, 25% of Americans feel that climate change is a "crisis," and 35% feel it is a "serious problem." 10% of Americans said they think climate change is a minor problem, and 16% of Americans feel it is not a problem that worries them.

The poll found that concern for the environment isn't a partisan issue – or at least when it comes to younger generations. Two-thirds of Republicans under the age of 45 feel that addressing climate change is their duty, sentiments shared by only 38% of Republicans over the age of 45.

Keep Reading Show less
The Planet