Going de Grey

How will living forever change our lives?

How long do you think you'll be around for? Ninety years? One hundred and twenty? Aubrey de Grey, a biogerontologist and Cambridge-trained Ph.D. who studies aging, thinks we could engineer techniques that reverse the wear on our bodies by replacing lost cells in our bones and hearts and even tweaking the cells themselves to prevent their degeneration. If de Grey is right, these therapies could help us live for hundreds-if not thousands-of years. What would we do with all that time?GOOD: How can we slow down aging?AUBREY DE GREY: In my view, we probably can't slow it down much at all. All we can do is reverse it. Yes, I know it seems paradoxical that reversal would be easier than slowing, but if you think about it, that's what we do with simple manmade machines such as cars or airplanes: We do periodic repair and maintenance. That's how we'll delay the ill health that aging eventually causes.G: So with the therapies you're talking about, would the whole development process take longer, or would we mature to adulthood in 20-odd years and then stay in that state for hundreds more?AD: The latter. Development and aging are two different processes. Development is a programmed process that essentially ends around age 20. Aging is an unprogrammed process that happens throughout life, and it's one we can affect.G: When you say we can reverse aging, what does that feel and look like? Does our skin get less wrinkly? Do our bones get stronger? Do we get shorter? Taller?AD: Yes, yes, no, no. We are restored to the look, feel, and function of a young adult.G: How would living for hundreds of years affect how we use our time?AD: It's impossible to say for sure, but I think the changes would actually be rather slight. We don't make career or life choices today in early adulthood on the basis of only having 50 more years to live.G: One thing people sometimes lament about modern life is the hectic pace. We don't seem to have time for leisurely walks or meals with the family or quiet reflection. With more time to live, would we reconsider the value of down time?AD: I think we will-not so much because we will expect a longer life, [but] because our other technology will continue to improve and give us the option of more leisure.G: Have you seen Groundhog Day? Will we all end up like Bill Murray, using our time to learn how to play new instruments and make ice sculptures, eventually reaching a place of Zen selflessness?AD: I haven't seen it, no. I find that essentially all fiction relating to the defeat of aging incorporates some arbitrary negative aspect for no reason at all, other than to make people feel okay with the fact that aging exists. But sure, I think we will get progressively more out of the creative and altruistic aspects of life.G: I know you've heard this question before, but wouldn't living for hundreds of years get a little boring?AD: Yeah, right. Wouldn't it be so terribly boring not getting Alzheimer's? At least you had the sense to be embarrassed at even asking the question.G: I didn't mean to suggest that the maladies of old age are what keep life exciting. But it does seem like we're propelled through life by milestones like moving out, marriage, having children, buying a house, and retiring. Isn't it possible that life becomes a little desultory without this normal rhythm?AD: I don't think so. We have been progressively shifting to doing things like that multiple times in our lives rather than only once, and that shift will merely continue. And it hasn't made life desultory so far, so I see no reason why it should do so in the future.G: How will we think about death differently? Will it seem even more tragic if it's not inevitable?AD: I think we will indeed be much more risk-averse, and we will address that by making our most risky activities less risky-by making cars safer and by investing more money in vaccine development, for example. But let's remember, I'm not working on eliminating death, only one cause of death.G: How long do you think you will live?AD: That depends on the pace of progress against aging. If progress is slow, probably between 90 and 100 [years]. If it's faster, there's no limit.G: What do you wish you had more time for these days?AD: Sleep.

via Real Time with Bill Maher / YouTube and The Late Late Show with James Corden / YouTube

A controversial editorial on America's obesity epidemic and healthcare by comedian Bill Maher on his HBO show "Real Time" inspired a thoughtful, and funny, response by James Cordon. It also made for a great debate about healthcare that Americans are avoiding.

At the end of the September 6th episode of "Real Time, " Maher turned to the camera for his usual editorial and discussed how obesity is a huge part of the healthcare debate that no one is having.

"At Next Thursday's debate, one of the candidates has to say, 'The problem with our healthcare system is Americans eat shit and too much of it.' All the candidates will mention their health plans but no one will bring up the key factor: the citizens don't lift a finger to help," Maher said sternly.

Keep Reading Show less

There is no shortage of proposals from the, um, what's the word for it… huge, group of Democratic presidential candidates this year. But one may stand out from the pack as being not just bold but also necessary; during a CNN town hall about climate change Andrew Yang proposed a "green amendment" to the constitution.

Keep Reading Show less
Me Too Kit

The creator of the Me Too kit — an at home rape kit that has yet to hit the market — has come under fire as sexual assault advocates argue the kit is dangerous and misleading for women.

The kit is marketed as "the first ever at home kit for commercial use," according to the company's website. "Your experience. Your kit. Your story. Your life. Your choice. Every survivor has a story, every survivor has a voice." Customers will soon be able order one of the DIY kits in order to collect evidence "within the confines of the survivor's chosen place of safety" after an assault.

"With MeToo Kit, we are able to collect DNA samples and other tissues, which upon testing can provide the necessary time-sensitive evidence required in a court of law to identify a sexual predator's involvement with sexual assault," according to the website.

Keep Reading Show less

Villagers rejoice as they receive the first vaccines ever delivered via drone in the Congo

The area's topography makes transporting medicines a treacherous task.

Photo by Henry Sempangi Senyule

When we discuss barriers to healthcare in the developed world, affordability is commonly the biggest concern. But for some in the developing world, physical distance and topography can be the difference between life and death.

Widjifake, a hard-to-reach village in northwestern Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) with a population of 6,500, struggles with having consistent access to healthcare supplies due to the Congo River and its winding tributaries.

It can take up to three hours for vehicles carrying supplies to reach the village.

Keep Reading Show less
via Keith Boykin / Twitter

Fox News and President Trump seem like they may be headed for a breakup. "Fox is a lot different than it used to be," Trump told reporters in August after one of the network's polls found him trailing for Democrats in the 2020 election.

"There's something going on at Fox, I'll tell you right now. And I'm not happy with it," he continued.

Some Fox anchors have hit back at the president over his criticisms. "Well, first of all, Mr. President, we don't work for you," Neil Cavuto said on the air. "I don't work for you. My job is to cover you, not fawn over you or rip you, just report on you."

Keep Reading Show less