Here's Why Chile's Latest Giant Earthquake Didn't Hurt Anyone

Chile was just hit with an earthquake bigger than Haiti's and suffered no injuries or damage. How'd they do that?

Just two days into 2011, almost a year after being ravaged by a massive earthquake, the nation of Chile again shook with the force of a 7.1 magnitude tremor. Unlike last year, however, this quake killed not a single person and left minimal damage (phone and power lines were down for a few hours). Haiti was outright crippled by a 7.0 quake in early 2010, and yet Chile is sitting pretty after an even more powerful natural disaster. How did that happen?

As with swimming pools, the difference is the depth. Next time you hear of an earthquake and are trying to assess the damage it will cause, don't just consider its Richter scale rating. Also important is whether the quake is shallow-focus or deep-focus. A shallow-focus earthquake, the most common kind, occurs when the tectonic shift's "hypocenter"—the subterranean spot at which the slip of an earthquake begins—is located within 70 kilometers of the earth's surface. (The "epicenter" of an earthquake is "simply the point on the Earth's surface directly above the hypocenter.) Conversely, deep-focus quakes are energy releases occurring several hundred kilometers underground. It's simple: The deeper the quake, the less shaking here on terra firma.

"The bottom line is that even though Chile was enormous, it was not shallow, reducing the shaking on the surface," says Aaron Velasco, a professor of seismology at the University of Texas at El Paso. "This isn't always true, but it's pretty consistent."

As an example of a relatively smaller quake whose shallow hypocenter made it devastating, Velasco points to 1994's Northridge, California, tremor. Despite being smaller on the Richter scale than both Chile and Haiti's recent quakes—6.7—the Northridge shift still killed dozens and injured thousands of others. "The damage done in Northridge was the direct result of it being shallow and in the middle of Los Angeles," says Velasco, "even though California leads the country in earthquake preparedness."

via Barry Schapiro / Twitter

The phrase "stay in your lane" is usually lobbed at celebrities who talk about politics on Twitter by people who disagree with them. People in the sports world will often get a "stick to sports" when they try to have an opinion that lies outside of the field of play.

Keep Reading

The Free the Nipple movement is trying to remove the stigma on women's breasts by making it culturally acceptable and legal for women to go topless in public. But it turns out, Free the Nipple might be fighting on the wrong front and should be focusing on freeing the nipple in a place you'd never expect. Your own home.

A woman in Utah is facing criminal charges for not wearing a shirt in her house, with prosecutors arguing that women's chests are culturally considered lewd.

Keep Reading

In August, the Recording Academy hired their first female CEO, Deborah Dugan. Ten days before the Grammys, Dugan was placed on administrative leave for misconduct allegations after a female employee said Dugan was "abusive" and created a "toxic and intolerable" work environment. However, Dugan says she was actually removed from her position for complaining to human resources about sexual harassment, pay disparities, and conflicts of interest in the award show's nomination process.

Just five days before the Grammys, Dugan filed a complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and her claims are many. Dugan says she was paid less than former CEO Neil Portnow. In 2018, Portnow received criticism for saying women need to "step up" when only two female acts won Grammys. Portnow decided to not renew his contract shortly after. Dugan says she was also asked to hire Portnow as a consultant for $750,000 a year, which she refused to do.

Keep Reading