How Much Will Technology Really Change Higher Education?

A Pew survey of tech experts and academics reveals that the majority believe a real revolution is on its way.

There's plenty of talk of how virtual learning platforms like the Khan Academy, Udacity, and edX are real higher education game changers. There's also lots of speculation over whether these and other technological advancements will just be integrated into the existing higher education system, or will they truly revolutionize it? In a new report from the Pew Research Center 60 percent of surveyed tech experts and academics say that thanks to the proliferation of technology, "by 2020, higher education will be quite different from the way it is today. "

Experts believe that not only is the time of traditional, in-person, on-campus lectures over, a completely new era of higher education is emerging. They believe there will "be mass adoption of teleconferencing and distance learning to leverage expert resources." We'll also see a significant shift toward "individualized, just-in-time learning approaches,"and hybrid classes that "combine online learning components with less-frequent on-campus, in-person class meetings." When it comes to assessing learning, schools will take into account individual subject mastery, which means that "requirements for graduation will be significantly shifted to customized outcomes."

Given that so much of the college experience involves building relationships with professors and collaborating with other students, how a more technology-centered higher education system will still accomplish that remains to be seen. How this shift will be accomplished in the next seven-and-a-half years is also an outstanding question. But the experts surveyed believe that change is inevitable due to economic concerns over the cost of college, as well as student and parent demands.

Photo via (cc) Flickr user US Mission Canada

via Barry Schapiro / Twitter

The phrase "stay in your lane" is usually lobbed at celebrities who talk about politics on Twitter by people who disagree with them. People in the sports world will often get a "stick to sports" when they try to have an opinion that lies outside of the field of play.

Keep Reading

The Free the Nipple movement is trying to remove the stigma on women's breasts by making it culturally acceptable and legal for women to go topless in public. But it turns out, Free the Nipple might be fighting on the wrong front and should be focusing on freeing the nipple in a place you'd never expect. Your own home.

A woman in Utah is facing criminal charges for not wearing a shirt in her house, with prosecutors arguing that women's chests are culturally considered lewd.

Keep Reading

In August, the Recording Academy hired their first female CEO, Deborah Dugan. Ten days before the Grammys, Dugan was placed on administrative leave for misconduct allegations after a female employee said Dugan was "abusive" and created a "toxic and intolerable" work environment. However, Dugan says she was actually removed from her position for complaining to human resources about sexual harassment, pay disparities, and conflicts of interest in the award show's nomination process.

Just five days before the Grammys, Dugan filed a complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and her claims are many. Dugan says she was paid less than former CEO Neil Portnow. In 2018, Portnow received criticism for saying women need to "step up" when only two female acts won Grammys. Portnow decided to not renew his contract shortly after. Dugan says she was also asked to hire Portnow as a consultant for $750,000 a year, which she refused to do.

Keep Reading