Is This the End of the European Union?

Europe's financial crisis is undermining one of the great global experiments in democracy and economics.

When Jean Monnet was 26, an assassination in the Balkans sparked World War I. When he was 51, Hitler’s Germany launched World War II, engulfing Europe in chaos again. The French economist concluded that only economic integration could keep the continent from war, and spent the rest of his life laying the groundwork for what would become the European Union.

Now, with the continent engulfed in financial crisis that began in the Balkans, it’s disturbingly possible that Monnet’s dream could go down the tubes, as France and Germany contemplate creating a “core” of economically-integrated countries and leaving insolvent members behind.

The European Union as a whole is the world’s largest economy, shares with the United States’ the globe’s largest trading relationship, and represents a noble experiment in international institutions that could be a model for the global future. Twelve years ago, 17 of the 27 European Union countries joined the Eurozone, agreeing to share a currency.

Due to some combination of bad policymaking, the global recession, a glut of investment from richer countries and simple bad timing, some of those governments—Greece, Italy, Ireland, Portugal, Spain—aren’t able to pay back their debts, and may be forced out of the union altogether. First, Greece got to the point where it couldn’t pay its debts, and now the country’s political system is in chaos. Italy, the world’s eighth-largest economy, has followed, with Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi being forced from power and government borrowing costs rising to the point of unsustainability.

The institutions that Monnet and his inheritors set up to unite Europe have lacked in some cases the tools to solve the problem (there’s no universal government budget in Europe that would make it easy to maintain a fiscal balance) or the willingness to do so (the European Central Bank has refused to take actions to lower interest rates, inflate away debt or backstop the financial system it oversees). The net result has been the sight of European leaders trying to build a fire truck, race it to a burning building, and use as little water as possible to extinguish the blaze. Now, as more and more houses catch fire, they’re squabbling over who’s going to pay for the rest of the water. European leaders would like the people who live in the burning houses to pay, but they’re not in much position do so.

Now, Germany and France, the Eurozone’s most powerful members, are talking about cutting the peripheral Euro countries out of their deal. That may help them solve their problems in the short term, but it will betray Monnet’s vision of economic cooperation and could undermine the continent’s long-term prospects of growth and development. "There cannot be peace and prosperity in the North or in the West of Europe, if there is no peace and prosperity in the South or in the East," European Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso said of reports that the Eurozone may be slimmed.

Europeans are now looking at ways to save themselves from the problems created by their union. But instead of moving forward toward a shared vision of the future, they’re moving backwards, toward more division, in ways that could shake the foundations of the still-slow global recovery. The response to this crisis is missing, and perhaps has missed, a chance to remind the people of Europe—and indeed people around the world, watching this complex crisis with bewilderment and bated breath—that jockeying for power and parochial interests will only undermine their people’s long-term hopes.

If only they can pull back from the brink.

Photo via (cc) Flickr user motiqua

via Honor Africans / Twitter

The problem with American Sign Language (ASL) is that over 500,000 people in the U.S. use it, but the country has over 330 million people.

So for those with hearing loss, the chances of coming into contact with someone who uses the language are rare. Especially outside of the deaf community.

Keep Reading Show less

Looking back, the year 1995 seems like such an innocent time. America was in the midst of its longest streak of peace and prosperity. September 11, 2001 was six years away, and the internet didn't seem like much more than a passing fad.

Twenty-four years ago, 18 million U.S. homes had modem-equipped computers, 7 million more than the year before. Most logged in through America Online where they got their email or communicated with random strangers in chat rooms.

According to a Pew Research study that year, only 32% of those who go online say they would miss it "a lot" if no longer available.

Imagine what those poll numbers would look like if the question was asked today.

RELATED: Bill and Melinda Gates had a surprising answer when asked about a 70 percent tax on the wealthiest Americans

"Few see online activities as essential to them, and no single online feature, with the exception of E-Mail, is used with any regularity," the Pew article said. "Consumers have yet to begin purchasing goods and services online, and there is little indication that online news features are changing traditional news consumption patterns."

"Late Night" host David Letterman had Microsoft founder and, at that time the richest man in the world, on his show for an interview in '95 to discuss the "the big new thing."

During the interview Letterman chided Gates about the usefulness of the new technology, comparing it to radio and tape recorders.

Gates seems excited by the internet because it will soon allow people to listen to a baseball game on their computer. To which Letterman smugly replies, "Does radio ring a bell?" to laughter from the crowd.

But Gates presses Letterman saying that the new technology allows you to listen to the game "whenever you want," to which Letterman responds, "Do tape recorders ring a bell?"

Gates then tells Letterman he can keep up with the latest in his favorite hobbies such as cigar smoking or race cars through the internet. Letterman shuts him down saying that he reads about his interests in magazines.

RELATED: Bill Gates has five books he thinks you should read this summer.

The discussion ends with the two laughing over meeting like-minded people in "troubled loner chat room on the internet."

The clip brings to mind a 1994 segment on "The Today Show" where host Bryant Gumbel and Katie Couric have a similar discussion.

"What is internet anyway?" an exasperated Gumball asks. "What do you write to it like mail?"

"It's a computer billboard but it's nationwide and it's several universities all joined together and it's getting bigger and bigger all the time," a producer explains from off-stage.

Photo by Li-An Lim on Unsplash

The future generations will have to live on this Earth for years to come, and, not surprisingly, they're very concerned about the fate of our planet. We've seen a rise in youth activists, such as Greta Thunberg, who are raising awareness for climate change. A recent survey indicates that those efforts are working, as more and more Americans (especially young Americans) feel concerned about climate change.

A new CBS News poll found that 70% of Americans between 18 and 29 feel climate change is a crisis or a serious problem, while 58% of Americans over the age of 65 share those beliefs. Additionally, younger generations are more likely to feel like it's their personal responsibility to address climate change, as well as think that transitioning to 100% renewable energy is viable. Overall, 25% of Americans feel that climate change is a "crisis," and 35% feel it is a "serious problem." 10% of Americans said they think climate change is a minor problem, and 16% of Americans feel it is not a problem that worries them.

The poll found that concern for the environment isn't a partisan issue – or at least when it comes to younger generations. Two-thirds of Republicans under the age of 45 feel that addressing climate change is their duty, sentiments shared by only 38% of Republicans over the age of 45.

Keep Reading Show less
The Planet