GOOD

The Other Reason Why the Brussels Attacks Terrify Me

What Ted Cruz doesn’t get about ISIS, American Muslim neighborhoods, and the nature of terrorism

Photo via Flickr user Miguel Discart

I woke up today to the news that there was an attack in Brussels. By the time I had brushed my teeth, ISIS had taken credit for the tragedy. As I drank my coffee, the hashtag #StopIslam was trending on Twitter. On my way to work, Ted Cruz, one of the leading Republican candidates for president, released a statement on the subject.


“We will do what we can to help them fight this scourge, and redouble our efforts to make sure it does not happen here,” he said. “We need to immediately halt the flow of refugees from countries with a significant al-Qaeda or ISIS presence. We need to empower law enforcement to patrol and secure Muslim neighborhoods before they become radicalized.”

It is eerie to listen to his press conference, as he declares a war against “radical Islamic terrorism.” Not because it is shocking, but because his words seem too familiar, too commonplace, in a political and social climate that is becoming increasingly hostile to Muslims. And to many people in this country, Cruz’s pronouncement may even be considered a lukewarm response. After all, Cruz’s chief opponent often uses genocidal rhetoric when he is talking about Muslims.

Cruz’s plan is a poorly thought-out one, however, because it assumes the existence of “Muslim neighborhoods.” Muslims, however, have not sequestered themselves in America. We are a diffuse population. You can find us in every major city in the country. If Cruz wants to patrol “Muslim neighborhoods,” he’ll need every state police force in the nation to dedicate their resources to that kind of effort. And they’ll need to patrol the halal shops, and the kabob carts, and the mosques, and the Islamic schools. They’ll need to patrol every hospital, and every school, and every bureaucratic office in the country. Because we are here, and we have been here for a very long time.

And anyway, this plan, like Donald Trump’s scheme to create a “database” of Muslims, is ludicrous because it takes for granted the fact that these programs don’t already exist. Muslim communities in this country are already being monitored and surveilled by FBI initiatives like the Countering Violent Extremism (CVE) program. My own mosque regularly cooperated with the FBI. Representatives from law enforcement frequently visited to give us seminars on detecting extremist activity in our communities. At the same time, the mosque leaders staged “Know Your Rights” workshops about what to do if we experienced unfair treatment or scrutiny from FBI agents or other law enforcement officials. A mosque that frequently cooperated with security agencies discovered that the FBI had planted an informant amongst its congregation. This is how I grew up: at odds with America and yet of it.

I have lived through many iterations of anti-Muslim discourse. Every attack, every tragedy, brings a new wave. I don’t know what it’s like to live in an America that doesn’t hate Muslims. This is the America that I know: an America that fears me as much as I fear it. When I walk into a business with my headscarf on, I wonder which one of the people staring at me is also the person commenting on Reddit forums that Muslims need to be exterminated, or put in concentration camps, or deported. Which person is tweeting racist expletives at me with an anonymous user name? Which one vandalized my mosque with graffiti? Which person is a provocation away from manifesting their fears in violence?

The rise of ISIS and the rise of Donald Trump have invigorated a fresh tide of anti-Muslim hatred. I noticed it the first time, about a year ago, walking to the bookstore in my neighborhood. A man driving past me pulled down his window to yell, “Terrorist!” It took me a while to register what had happened, because it hadn’t happened in so long. “Still got it,” I thought, with some humor.

In the months since this incident, the country has seen an escalation of anti-Muslim sentiment. This has, in part, been fueled by a number of ISIS-inflicted tragedies: the Paris bombings, the Charlie Hebdo shootings, the San Bernardino shooting. And then there are the lesser-known attacks: the Ankara bombing that took 37 lives; the Tunis bus attack that took 12; the Bamako hostage crisis that killed 27.

Muslims are ISIS’s most frequent victims, in more ways than one. These tragedies destroy the notion that ISIS or “Islam” is at war with the Western world, despite what Ted Cruz or Donald Trump would have you believe. These attacks, in fact, suggest that ISIS is struggling for support in places where Muslims are the majority. There is no monolithic “Islam” to defeat; there are no “neighborhoods” of Muslims to quash in the United States. Muslims don’t behave as a collective. This narrative, however, is not one that fear-mongering politicians and demagogues want you to be familiar with, because then the enemy becomes a lot more difficult to apprehend.

It is jarring to see pictures from Brussels, to see rubble and ash coat the city in a somber gray. Events like these remind us of our fragile humanity. And it’s fearful, certainly, to see how quickly human life is snuffed out by the whims of evil men. But it is what we do with that fear that determines our moral character.

Articles
Center for American Progress Action Fund

Tonight's Democratic debate is a must-watch for followers of the 2020 election. And it's a nice distraction from the impeachment inquiry currently enveloping all of the political oxygen in America right now.

For most people, the main draw will be newly anointed frontrunner Pete Buttigieg, who has surprisingly surged to first place in Iowa and suddenly competing in New Hampshire. Will the other Democrats attack him? How will Elizabeth Warren react now that she's no longer sitting alone atop the primary field? After all, part of Buttigieg's rise has been his criticisms of Warren and her refusal to get into budgetary specifics over how she'd pay for her healthcare plan.

The good news is that Joe Biden apparently counts time travel amongst his other resume-building experience.

Keep Reading Show less
Official White House Photo by Sonya N. Hebert

This election cycle, six women threw their hat in the ring for president, but is their gender holding them back? Would Americans feel comfortable with a woman leading the free world? Based on the last election, the answer is a swift no. And a new study backs this up. The study found that only 49% of American men would feel very comfortable with a woman serving as the head of the government. By comparison, 59% of women said they would feel comfortable with a woman in charge.

The Reykjavik Index for Leadership, which measures attitude towards women leaders, evaluated the attitudes of those living in the G7 countries as well as Brazil, China, India, and Russia. 22,000 adults in those 11 countries were surveyed on their attitudes about female leadership in 22 different sectors, including government, fashion, technology, media, banking and finance, education, and childcare.

Only two countries, Canada and the U.K., had a majority of respondents say they would be more comfortable with a female head of state. Germany (which currently has a female Chancellor), Japan, and Russia were the countries least comfortable with a female head of state.

Keep Reading Show less
Culture
via Gage Skidmore / Flickr

If you are totally ready to move on from Donald Trump, you're not alone. According to a report last April from the Wason Center National Survey of 2020 Voters, "President Trump will be the least popular president to run for reelection in the history of polling."

Yes, you read that right, "history of polling."

Keep Reading Show less
Politics
via Around the NFL / Twitter

After three years on the sidelines, Colin Kapernick will be working out for multiple NFL teams on Saturday, November 16 at the Atlanta Falcons facility.

The former 49er quarterback who inflamed the culture wars by peacefully protesting against social injustice during the national anthem made the announcement on Twitter Tuesday.

Kaepernick is scheduled for a 15-minute on-field workout and an interview that will be recorded and sent to all 32 teams. The Miami Dolphins, Dallas Cowboys, and Detroit Lions are expected to have representatives in attendance.

RELATED: Joe Namath Says Colin Kaepernick And Eric Reid Should Be Playing In The NFL

"We like our quarterback situation right now," Miami head coach, Brian Flores said. "We're going to do our due diligence."

NFL Insider Steve Wyche believes that the workout is the NFL's response to multiple teams inquiring about the 32-year-old quarterback. A league-wide workout would help to mitigate any potential political backlash that any one team may face for making an overture to the controversial figure.

Kapernick is an unrestricted free agent (UFA) so any team could have reached out to him. But it's believed that the interested teams are considering him for next season.

RELATED: Video of an Oakland train employee saving a man's life is so insane, it looks like CGI

Earlier this year, Kaepernick and Carolina Panthers safety Eric Reid reached a financial settlement with the league in a joint collusion complaint. The players alleged that the league conspired to keep them out after they began kneeling during the national anthem in 2016.

Before the 2019 season, Kaepernick posted a video of himself working out on twitter to show he was in great physical condition and ready to play.

Kaepnick took the 49ers to the Super Bowl in 2012 and the NFC Championship game in 2013.

He has the 23rd-highest career passer rating in NFL history, the second-best interception rate, and the ninth-most rushing yards per game of any quarterback ever. In 2016, his career to a sharp dive and he won only of 11 games as a starter.

Culture