The Recovery Act has provided a windfall of funding opportunities to help advance green jobs in our country. From green jobs training programs to grants for clean energy research, the Recovery Act is helping put people back to work while simultaneously pushing our nation towards a green economy. However, some of these green jobs are…
The Recovery Act has provided a windfall of funding opportunities to help advance green jobs in our country. From green jobs training programs to grants for clean energy research, the Recovery Act is helping put people back to work while simultaneously pushing our nation towards a green economy. However, some of these green jobs are actually quite hazardous.
In a new story for ProPublica, David Epstein examines the beryllium risks that employees of the Hanford Nuclear Reservation may be facing. The facility received $2 billion in stimulus dollars to help clean up the area. This funding will add 4,000 new jobs in the area and at $17 per hour plus benefits for some positions; this would be considered a good green job.
However, this is a nuclear facility and so radiation and other contamination risks are real. Employees received comprehensive training about radiation risks but only a few hours on the risk of beryllium dust. One of the worrisome risks is a rare but incurable condition, chronic beryllium disease.
“A new CBD prevention program at the 586-square-mile Hanford site was to be in place January 1. Yet there have been lapses and delays as stimulus hiring proceeds. Months after the deadline, workers say beryllium safety steps are not uniformly implemented. Current and former workers say safety officials downplay the dangers of beryllium and that new workers don’t understand the gravity of the risk.” Source: ProPublica
Epstein’s article goes into great detail about the risks of beryllium dust and the health legacy that the nuclear facility has left on its past employees. The article is broken down into several sections: Stimulus Jobs versus Beryllium Risks, CBD and Hanford, Apology to Beryllium Workers, and Beryllium Whistleblowers at Hanford.
Although Epstein’s article focuses specifically on the dangers of beryllium dust, it isn’t the first article that touches on how some of these good green jobs being funded through stimulus dollars are actually more like hazardous “green” jobs.
Earlier this year, several employees of Lacy Enterprises filed a racial discrimination lawsuit in Alabama. These individuals were required to clean out the baghouses at coal-fired power plants. The purpose of a baghouse is to reduce the release of hazardous air pollutants at the power plant. However, these baghouses need to be cleaned on a regular basis.
In comes Lacy Enterprises, a subsidiary of GE, which provided workers to clean out the baghouses. Unfortunately these workers were faced with demeaning racial slurs and less than safe working conditions. The complaint alleges that the employees weren’t given new facemasks on a regular basis and received insufficient protective gear.
Again, these are supposed to be good green jobs—jobs that help improve the economy while providing a good wage and benefits. However, worker safety is being left out of this equation. Perhaps the good green jobs mantra needs to be switched to good, safe green jobs.
Melissa Hincha-Ownby blogs about the latest in green biz for the Mother Nature Network.
Reddit user Girlfriendhatesmefor’s three-year-old pitbull, Otis, had recently become overprotective of his wife. So he asked the online community if they knew what might be wrong with the dog.
“A week or two ago, my wife got some sort of stomach bug,” the Reddit user wrote under the subreddit /r/dogs. “She was really nauseous and ill for about a week. Otis is very in tune with her emotions (we once got in a fight and she was upset, I swear he was staring daggers at me lol) and during this time didn’t even want to leave her to go on walks. We thought it was adorable!”
His wife soon felt better, butthe dog’s behavior didn’t change.
Girlfriendhatesmefor began to fear that Otis’ behavior may be an early sign of an aggression issue or an indication that the dog was hurt or sick.
So he threw a question out to fellow Reddit users: “Has anyone else’s dog suddenly developed attachment/aggression issues? Any and all advice appreciated, even if it’s that we’re being paranoid!”
The most popular response to his thread was by ZZBC.
Any chance your wife is pregnant?
ZZBC | Reddit
The potential news hit Girlfriendhatesmefor like a ton of bricks. A few days later, Girlfriendhatesmefor posted an update and ZZBC was right!
“The wifey is pregnant!” the father-to-be wrote. “Otis is still being overprotective but it all makes sense now! Thanks for all the advice and kind words! Sorry for the delayed reply, I didn’t check back until just now!”
Redditors responded with similar experiences.
Anecdotal I know but I swear my dog knew I was pregnant before I was. He was super clingy (more than normal) and was always resting his head on my belly.
realityisworse | Reddit
So why do dogs get overprotective when someone is pregnant?
Jeff Werber, PhD, president and chief veterinarian of the Century Veterinary Group in Los Angeles, told Health.com that “dogs can also smell the hormonal changes going on in a woman’s body at that time.” He added the dog may “not understand that this new scent of your skin and breath is caused by a developing baby, but they will know that something is different with you—which might cause them to be more curious or attentive.”
The big lesson here is to listen to your pets and to ask questions when their behavior abruptly changes. They may be trying to tell you something, and the news may be life-changing.
Throughout history, women have stood up and fought to break down barriers imposed on them from stereotypes and societal expectations. The trailblazers in these photos made history and redefined what a woman could be. In doing so, they paved the way for future generations to stand up and continue to fight for equality.
While conspiracy theories are not limited to any topic, there is one type of event that seems particularly likely to spark them: mass shootings, typically defined as attacks in which a shooter kills at least four other people.
When one person kills many others in a single incident, particularly when it seems random, people naturally seek out answers for why the tragedy happened. After all, if a mass shooting is random, anyone can be a target.