The initiative is one of many proposed and already underway to look at the effect of more time spent in school on the quality of learning. Last year, President Obama and Education Secretary Arne Duncan called for extended school years and longer days to help cut the gap in achievement between U.S. children and those from other nations. In February, the school board in Houston approved a pilot program for an extended school year, which would add two weeks to the calendar; it's superintendent cited longer years at both YES and KIPP charter schools as inspiration for the move.
Meanwhile, a Brooking Institution study released in late-2007 found that more time spent on math instruction led to higher math scores. A study at the American Institutes of Research found that one of the ingredients behind charter schools' success was an extended school day. Though, more time itself was not the key to its effectiveness.
These schools that embedded support for students into the regular school day and provided for more opportunities for teachers to participate in collective professional development, student-focused discussion, and collaborative planning time" were more important than just more time.\n
Interestingly, as the idea of extending the school day starts to gain traction, so does the idea of starting it later, as early morning bells have been linked to depression, weight gain, and poor academic performance. Many school districts around the country that once started classes before 8 a.m. have delayed them by roughly an hour.
So, we should keep kids in class longer? But, we shouldn't start them too early? Either or both is fine by me, as long as it doesn't bankrupt school districts in the process. A less money-consuming option, of course, is to use the time already allotted for more effective instruction.