Why Tuesday? The Case For Moving Election Day

Believe it or not there's a question that unites both Romney and Obama: Why do we vote on Tuesday?


Believe it or not, there's a question—and there aren't all that many—that unites President Barack Obama and his challenger Mitt Romney. It's one that has an absolutely infuriating answer. Here's the question: "Why do we vote on Tuesday in the United States?"

Obama and Romney are united not in their knowledge of the answer, but in being stumped by it. Obama, as a presidential candidate in 2007, told a Harvard College student it's because it was a decision made by the states. Romney, on the other hand, came right out and said "I have no idea."

So what is the answer? There's absolutely no good reason whatsoever. I am not joking. We vote on Tuesday because of a law meant to make voting convenient for those who traveled by horse-and-buggy and had to be back home in time for market day without traveling on days of religious observance. So by process of elimination, Tuesday it was.

Please take this time to pick your jaw up off of the floor. Yes, the answer is that stupid. You can watch my TED Talk for a little-bit-longer answer with a few wonkier details.

Today, despite early voting and voting-by-mail in most states, in 15 states you can only vote on Tuesday during the hours the polling place is open. So if you're a single mother or father, or work two or three jobs, or have long hours in school and you can't make it to your polling place... tough luck. This in a country whose voter turnout ranks 138th of 172 nations. Let me repeat: the world's most famous democracy has one of the world's worst voter turnouts.

Whether we move Election Day to the weekend or make it a National Holiday to increase turnout, or adopt convenience voting in all 50 states, something must be done to fix our terribly broken voting system. With rules that make it more difficult to vote, from voter ID, to purging, caging, felon disenfranchisement, and tricky registration regulations, the least we can do is vote on a day or in a way that makes voting accessible.

This has been a seven-year-long journey for me. In 2005, Ambassador Andrew Young, who fought along side Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. for the passage of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, congressional scholar Norman Ornstein, and New York attorney William Wachtel, whose father also worked closely with Dr. King, started to honor the 40 years that had passed since the passage of the VRA. What they didn't want to do, however, was throw a party when our voter turnout was so horrendous, so many decades after all of the barriers to the franchise had supposedly been removed.

When I joined their team in 2006, we hit the road with a video camera to ask "why Tuesday?" to any politician we could: from Senators John Kerry, Dick Lugar, Dianne Feinstein, and Rick Santorum, to U.S. current or former Representatives Darrell Issa, Nancy Pelosi, Newt Gingrich, and more. Very few knew the answer to the question, but most agreed we have to do something to change our horrendous voter turnout.

There have been bills, from Hillary Clinton's to make Election Day a national holiday, to Steve Israel's that would move Election Day to the weekend. But none have passed and for another not-so-good reason: if you were a member of Congress, would you change the rules of the game that allowed you to get your job? Probably not. But our Congress serves us, the voters and our democracy, not their job security. The onus is on our elected officials in Washington to change our Tuesday election day from where it has been for 167 years to make voting accesible for us all.

We are proud to be a part of GOOD's Take Back Tuesday. If our politicians aren't going to change the day we vote, we'll stand together, united, and do everything we can to make sure the private citizens and businesses of our nation throws one hell of a party on the day that is, ironically, the one our elected officials live and breathe for: Election Day.


Jacob Soboroff, host of HuffPost Live, was Executive Director of Why Tuesday? from 2007-2012, and now serves on the organization's Board of Directors.

NHM Vienna/Hans Reschreiter

Wealth inequality has been a hot topic of discussion as of late, but it's something that's occurred all throughout history. Class structure is a complicated issue, especially when you consider that haves and have nots have been in existence for over 4,000 years.

A study published in Science took a look at over 100 late Neolithic and early Bronze Age skeletons found in a burial site in southern Germany. The study "shed light on the complexity of social status, inheritance rules, and mobility during the Bronze Age." Partly by looking at their teeth and the artifacts they were buried with, researchers were able to discover that wealth inequality existed almost 4,000 years ago. "Our results reveal that individual households lasting several generations consisted of a high-status core family and unrelated low-status individuals, a social organization accompanied by patrilocality and female exogamy, and the stability of this system over 700 years," the study said.

Keep Reading Show less

Climate change means our future is uncertain, but in the meantime, it's telling us a lot about our past. The Earth's glaciers are melting at an alarming rate, but as the ice dwindles, ancient artifacts are being uncovered. The Secrets of the Ice project has been surveying the glaciers on Norway's highest mountains in Oppland since 2011. They have found a slew of treasures, frozen in time and ice, making glacier archeologists, as Lars Pilø, co-director of Secrets of the Ice, put it when talking to CNN, the "unlikely beneficiaries of global warming."

Instead of digging, glacier archeologists survey the areas of melting ice, seeing which artifacts have been revealed by the thaw. "It's a very different world from regular archaeological sites," Pilø told National Geographic. "It's really rewarding work.

Keep Reading Show less

When former Pittsburgh Steelers' center Mike Webster committed suicide in 2002, his death began to raise awareness of the brain damage experienced by NFL football players. A 2017 study found that 99% of deceased NFL players had a degenerative brain disease known as CTE (chronic traumatic encephalopathy). Only one out of 111 former football players had no sign of CTE. It turns out, some of the risks of traumatic brain injury experienced by heavily padded adults playing at a professional level also exist for kids with developing brains playing at a recreational level. The dangers might not be as intense as what the adults go through, but it can have some major life-long consequences.

A new PSA put out by the Concussion Legacy Foundation raises awareness of the dangers of tackle football on developing brains, comparing it to smoking. "Tackle football is like smoking. The younger I start, the longer I am exposed to danger. You wouldn't let me smoke. When should I start tackling?" a child's voice can be heard saying in the PSA as a mother lights up a cigarette for her young son.

Keep Reading Show less
via Gage Skidmore / Flickr

On Tuesday morning, President Trump tweeted about some favorable economic numbers, claiming that annual household income is up, unemployment is low, and housing prices are high.

Now, just imagine how much better those numbers would be if the country wasn't mired in an economy-killing trade war with China, bleeding out trillion-dollar-a-year debts, and didn't suffer from chaotic leadership in the Oval Office?

At the end of tweet, came an odd sentence, "Impeach the Pres."

Keep Reading Show less

October is domestic violence awareness month and when most people think of domestic violence, they imagine mostly female victims. However, abuse of men happens as well – in both heterosexual and homosexual relationships. But some are taking it upon themselves to change all that.

Keep Reading Show less