Thirty-eight years ago, Sharon Christa McAuliffe, a social studies teacher at Concord High School in New Hampshire, boarded NASA’s Space Shuttle Challenger. Selected as the first schoolteacher for NASA’s “Teachers in Space” program, she aimed to rekindle public interest in space exploration. On January 28, 1986, millions watched as the Challenger took off, only for their excitement to turn to horror within 73 seconds as flames engulfed the shuttle, staining the blue sky with smoke.

Image Source: Christa McAuliffe during a microgravity flight aboard NASA's KC-135 zero-gravity aircraft, January 8, 1986. Image courtesy National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). (Photo by Smith Collection/Gado/Getty Images)
Image Source: Christa McAuliffe during a microgravity flight aboard NASA's KC-135 zero-gravity aircraft, January 8, 1986. Image courtesy National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). (Photo by Smith Collection/Gado/Getty Images)

In addition to McAuliffe, the crew members onboard were Commander Francis R. Scobee, Pilot Michael J. Smith, Mission Specialists Ellison S. Onizuka, Electrical Engineer Judith A. Resnik, Ronald E. McNair, and Payload Specialist Gregory B. Jarvis. All seven members unfortunately perished in the fumes.

Image Source: NASA
Image Source: NASA

It was the day of January 28, 1986, when a high-speed elevator carried the crew almost twenty stories up the launch tower. The outer tank spewed a stream of boiling liquid oxygen from beneath the conical beanie cap at its tip. Donning their spacesuits and clamshell helmets, the astronauts stepped inside the shuttle. The hatch shut behind them.

Image Source: NASA
Image Source: NASA

It was nearly 11:30 a.m. Students in school classrooms across the country stood up from their desks and gathered in the cafeterias, and family members of the astronauts took leave from their work, all hooked to the black-and-white television screens to watch the brilliant crew take off in Challenger.

Image Source: NASA
Image Source: NASA

Shortly after, the boosters released powerful flames, pushing the steel casings outward as the Challenger ascended, trailing plumes of smoke against the azure sky. Seven seconds into the flight, Smith said, “Go, you mother,” as captured by the operational recorder, the transcript of which has been shared by NASA. The shuttle was launched and the people cheered behind TV screens. Judy Resnik gave an exuberant yell: “Sh*t hot!” “Ooohh-kay!” Scobee replied. But something was wrong. At 58 seconds, a spark exploded through a joint at the bottom of one of the boosters. At this time, the shuttle was at an altitude of 35,000 feet above the ground.

via GIPHY

“Feel that mother go!” said Smith. “Wooohooo!” “Challenger, go at throttle up,” the CapCom radioed from Mission Control. “Roger, go at throttle up,” said Scobee, 70 seconds after launch, as per The Washington Post. In a few moments, the flame gathered at the booster spread into the outer tank, burning its insulation. Three seconds later, Smith said, “Uh-oh”- the last words heard on the spacecraft.

Tons of liquid hydrogen shot through the engines. At 73 seconds, the transmission from the disintegrating spacecraft ceased. Soon enough, people, who were cheering for the spacecraft minutes ago, watched in horror as the explosion lit up the sky. The craft plummeted down from 46,000 feet above the Atlantic Ocean.

Image Source: The space shuttle 'Challenger' malfunctions shortly after take-off, resulting in the deaths of all seven crew members, 28th January 1986. (Photo by Space Frontiers/Getty Images)
Image Source: The space shuttle 'Challenger' malfunctions shortly after take-off, resulting in the deaths of all seven crew members, 28th January 1986. (Photo by Space Frontiers/Getty Images)

The cause behind the tragedy was the loss of integrity of the O-ring seals in the solid rocket booster segment joints. Some of NASA’s engineers who worked on the program raised concerns regarding the inefficient O-ring seals caused by the freezing temperatures the previous night. But they couldn’t halt the mission as the managers had cleared the launch on January 28.

Image Source: Wreckage of the Space Shuttle Challenger (OV-099) displayed in the Logistics Facility of Kennedy Space Center in Houston, Texas, 9th April 1986. (Photo by Space Frontiers/Archive Photos/Hulton Archive/Getty Images)
Image Source: Wreckage of the Space Shuttle Challenger (OV-099) displayed in the Logistics Facility of Kennedy Space Center in Houston, Texas, 9th April 1986. (Photo by Space Frontiers/Archive Photos/Hulton Archive/Getty Images)

After three months of operation, the human remains and moss-covered silver fragments of the shuttle were recovered from the ocean floor.


https://youtube.com/watch?v=hgA4HUfpyF4%3Fsi%3DmsRmoYreJUK-DSbd
This article originally appeared last year.
  • Researchers capture sperm whales headbutting on camera, validating what sailors have said for centuries
    Photo credit: University of St Andrews/YouTubeSperm whales headbutting.
    ,

    Researchers capture sperm whales headbutting on camera, validating what sailors have said for centuries

    “It’s exciting to think about what as-yet unseen behaviours we may soon uncover”

    For centuries, sailors have told wild tales of whales ramming ships. Reports of a sperm whale smashing and sinking the Essex in 1820 inspired Herman Melville to write Moby-Dick. Scientists had never witnessed it themselves—until now.

    Researchers have captured the first-ever drone footage of sperm whales headbutting each other. During fieldwork off the coast of the Balearic Islands, they recorded three separate incidents between 2020 and 2022.

    Drone footage captures sperm whales headbutting

    The new study was published in the journal Marine Mammal Science. Using drones, researchers from the University of St Andrews, the University of the Azores, and Asociación Tursiops captured video evidence of sperm whales headbutting. They found that most of the whales were young, immature males. In one incident, a young male circling near a female suddenly charged and slammed into her, knocking her off course. After the impact, she broke away from the group and did not return.

    The researchers estimated impact speeds ranging from 1.8 to 8 miles per hour, with collisions generating forces of up to 20 tons of pressure. The impacts captured on video were not necessarily considered aggressive. In fact, researchers believe the behavior reflects rough play or forms of mock combat. Similar behaviors can be seen in other mammals, like dolphins and lions.

    sperm whales, Moby Dick, literature, history, whaling
    A depiction of Moby-Dick.
    Photo credit: Canva

    Observations of sperm whale behavior

    Using their large heads, sperm whales have been reported by whalers to strike and move objects since the 19th century. “It was really exciting to observe this behaviour, which we knew had been hypothesised for such a long time, but not yet documented and described systematically,” said Dr. Alec Burslem, lead author of the study.

    “It’s exciting to think about what as-yet unseen behaviours we may soon uncover, as well how more headbutting observations may help us to shed light on the functions the behaviour may serve,” Burslem added.

    Documented, unprovoked attacks on humans by sperm whales are exceedingly rare, with most occurring during historical whaling incidents. Research indicates that sperm whales do not naturally exhibit aggression toward humans. While they can be curious, they often avoid vessels and observers. Historical accounts of whales ramming ships are likely defensive reactions rather than predatory attacks.

    ocean mammals, sperm whales, non-aggressive behavior, language, social structures
    A sperm whale.
    Photo credit: Canva

    Language and cultural identities

    Whales use clicks like letters, combining them into sequences that function like words in a complex form of communication. A 2024 study found that sperm whales use a highly sophisticated communication system with structures resembling a phonetic alphabet. These audio cues are used for coordination, caregiving, and social interaction.

    A 2022 study found that specific click patterns serve as symbolic markers that help establish cultural identities within sperm whale pods. Researchers identified seven distinct clans, each with its own unique dialect. This provided quantitative evidence of whale social structures known as identity codas.

    Studying this new drone footage offers fresh insights into whale social groups and behavior. While the headbutting may look aggressive, researchers interpret it as rough play. With technologies like drones giving scientists unprecedented access to these interactions, it’s exciting to think of what discoveries are yet to be made.

  • Study reveals startling truth: Intelligence lowers our empathy toward other people
    Photo credit: Canva(L) A man gives a thumbs up; (R) An eviction notice

    A recent study conducted on adults in the UK found that people with higher cognitive ability scored lower on moral foundations. The study, published this summer in the journalIntelligence, sought to gage people’s response to the Moral Foundations Theory based on their overall intelligence. After two different studies, no difference was found between genders, but a person’s intelligence revealed a different story.

    The research suggests that analytical thinkers tend to override their baseline moral intuitiveness. But what does that actually mean? First, cognitive ability refers to problem solving, abstract thinking, memory, logic, language comprehension, and basic critical thinking. This isn’t only IQ, but a person’s ability to process and apply their knowledge. Think of it as a living scholastic aptitude test (SAT.)

    intelligence, moral psychology, cognitive science, empathy, human behavior
    Man embraces a sunset. Photo Credit: Canva

    After testing to rate cognitive ability, subjects were then tested against The Moral Foundations Theory. The idea behind the theory is that, despite different cultures and populations, people tend to follow a similar set of themes and intuitive ethics. The theory follows six core ideas: care, equality, proportionality, loyalty, authority, and purity.

    Surprisingly, the results of the tests found that people with higher intelligence found the moral foundations to be less important.

    Care

    Care has to do with the virtues of kindness, gentleness, and nurturing. This is the foundation of empathy. By feeling connected and emotionally attached to the community, people gain purpose and a strong feeling of belonging.

    Equality

    intelligence, moral psychology, cognitive science, empathy, human behavior
    Symbols for equal diversity. Photo credit: Canva

    Always a hot topic on the political playing field, equality looks to create fair circumstances. The idea is all people have equal opportunity and treatment. Communities offering equality have reduced resentment and foster a cooperative environment where people feel respected and included.

    Proportionality

    This concept is based on fairness and merit. People should get what they deserve and be treated by what they do, not just who they are. What you put in, you get out. This is a driving principle underlying a core belief of this country: that anyone can achieve most anything if they are willing to put in the work. Many would argue for its merit while others would call it wishful thinking.

    Loyalty

    intelligence, moral psychology, cognitive science, empathy, human behavior
    Hands come together. Photo credit: Canva

    This is another popular topic of political leaders and followers. We are tribal by nature and greatly benefit from a feeling of belonging. Sacrificing the individual wants for the needs of the group, this is one of the foundational cornerstones of building communities.

    Authority

    leaders, leadership, hierarchy, traditions, genetics, authority, groups, UK adults, social groups
    Leader in front of group. Photo credit: Canva

    Authority encompasses the concepts of hierarchy and respect for traditions. Research shows we are genetically programmed to seek a social hierarchy. As much as many fight to climb to the top, feeling a part of the system is often enough to supply someone with a great amount of emotional security.

    Purity

    Perhaps you’ve heard the phrase, “Your body is a temple.” The ideal is expressed through self-discipline, self-improvement, and spirituality. Striving to be noble and less carnal, people try to be the best version of themselves. The moral advancement and the elevation of the social consciousness of the community is believed to have incredible value.

    These core values are believed to be inherent in all people, but are they? At least according to this most recent study, the more intelligent you are, the less you might care about them. However, author and literary genius Leo Tolstoy once famously claimed that kindness is one sure sign of a highly intelligent person and other studies back up his views. Maybe when it comes down to it, it depends on the person.

    This article originally appeared last year. It has been updated.

  • Body language experts reveal the secret truth about people who walk with their hands behind their backs​
    Photo credit: CanvaA man and a woman walking with their hands behind their backs
    , ,

    Body language experts reveal the secret truth about people who walk with their hands behind their backs​

    It isn’t just an old-fashioned habit; experts say this specific posture signals confidence, deep thought, and openness.

    The way a person walks is a silent broadcast of their current state of mind. A fast pace with swinging arms suggests determination; a slow shuffle with eyes downcast suggests detachment or aimlessness.

    But what about the person strolling with their hands clasped firmly behind their back?

    Well, body language experts believe that walking with your hands behind your back reveals a great deal about your mindset and your personality. They believe that, by keeping your hands behind your back while walking, a person is removing a distraction from their field of vision. This can allow a person to better process complex ideas, difficult emotions, or mentally work through problems as they walk. In short, walking with your hands behind your back indicates deep overall thoughtfulness.

    @the.mcfarlands

    not an ounce of stress in that walk ? follow us on IG: itsthemcfarlands ? #dad #dan #dadsoftiktok

    ♬ original sound – notrigby


    It’s not just deep thinking either. Other experts believe that walking with your hands clasped behind your back shows off confidence but without intimidation. By walking with your hands away from your torso, you’re fully exposing your chest and belly rather than being in a traditionally defensive position. While you may be walking deep in thought, it also allows people around you to know that you can be approached and will respond without malice. This is in contrast to body language in which the arms are in front of the body, indicating that you’re closed off or not in the mood for interaction.

    @yajairarh40

    Old people know what they are doing with this walk. #walks #saturdaymorning #carync #fy

    ♬ original sound – ar1esluver

    However, while walking with your arms behind your back can be seen as an invitation, it can come off as authoritative, too. By walking tall with your chest fully exposed, it mentally communicates that you’re calm and in control of the situation, not worrying about any incoming threat. This is partially why you see world leaders, military folks, teachers, and other persons in such roles walk this way in order to appear authoritative yet approachable. By having your arms behind you, your defense appears down but your authority appears up simultaneously.

    Alongside the psychological body language aspects of this type of walk, it also has some physical benefits. While walking with your hands behind your back shows a more confident posture, it improves your posture overall, too. Putting your arms behind your back naturally pulls your shoulders back and opens your chest, allowing your spine to straighten up and align. While it won’t improve your posture instantly, habitually walking with your hands behind your back can turn proper posture into an instinctual habit as well.


    So, if you’re heading to and from places and your mind’s racing with stress, you may want to try putting your hands behind your back. The posture helps reset your mind and keeps it calm while searching for solutions to your every day problems. Will it work? Maybe. Maybe not. Some things cannot be willed into existence. However, you’ll at least appear like you have your act together (and great posture, too!).

    This article originally appeared earlier this year.

Explore More Exploration Stories

Science

Researchers capture sperm whales headbutting on camera, validating what sailors have said for centuries

Exploration

Study reveals startling truth: Intelligence lowers our empathy toward other people

Exploration

Body language experts reveal the secret truth about people who walk with their hands behind their backs​

Exploration

Psychologists reveal 10 signs that someone is secretly super intelligent and may not even know it