GOOD.is
GOOD is a collaboration of individuals, businesses, and nonprofits pushing the world forward. Get involved.
  • Home
  • |
  • Columns ▶
    • BoingBoing on GOOD
    • Joe Ippolito on Business
    • Carol Coletta on Cities
    • Alissa Walker on Design
    • Ben Jervey on the Environment
    • Peter Smith on Food
    • Truman National Security Project on Foreign Policy
    • Picture Show
    • Mark Peters on Language
    • Anne Trubek on Literature
    • See All Columns
  • |
  • Video
  • |
  • Infographics
  • |
  • Community
  • |
  • Events
  • Follow GOOD:
  • twitter
  • flickr
  • facebook
  • youtube
  • rss feed
  • Business
  • |
  • Cities
  • |
  • Culture
  • |
  • Design
  • |
  • Education
  • |
  • Environment
  • |
  • Food
  • |
  • Health
  • |
  • Media
  • |
  • People
  • |
  • Politics
  • |
  • Technology
  • |
  • Transportation
  • 5
  • 254

How Spellcheckers Wreak Havoc

  • Posted by: Mark Peters
  • on January 30, 2009 at 8:45 am

“I apologize for any incontinence” and other examples of the Cupertino effect

Several years ago, a coworker sent me an email that included this memorable expression of apology: “I’m sorry for any incontinence.” Needless to say, so was I.

But did my colleague really lose control of his bowels or bladder, and then decide to tell me about it through email? Doubtful. In reality, I am sure this dude and the word inconvenience were victims of the Cupertino effect, also known as spellchecker errors or “Damn, I thought I could trust my computer’s suggestions and automatic changes.” Though the algorithms behind spellcheckers are constantly improving, it’s unlikely they’ll ever be infallible, which is alright with me, because the Cupertino effect is up there with Eric Cartman and funny monkey videos as a time-tested humor-producer.

This type of error is called the Cupertino effect because an old version of spell-check (in Word 97) used to offer Cupertino—the name of a northern California city that is home to Apple—as the first suggestion to replace the word cooperation, which in British English is supposed to have a hyphen. That strange replacement produced bizarre phrases that can still be found in places like the United Nations website, which features intriguing phrases (“…teaching and learning methods that stress participation, Cupertino, problem-solving and respect for differences…”) and lofty goals (“…the strengthening of international peace and Cupertino, should emanate from adults and be instilled in children…”). These words would inspire us all if they didn’t sound so batty.

The Cupertino effect is an equal-opportunity screw-up, afflicting international organizations, hapless students, and respected publications alike. Cupertino struck The New York Times just after the debut episode of The Colbert Report, when the not-yet-famous word truthiness was misprinted as trustiness (perhaps foreshadowing how trusty the word would be in this slippery age). On the Boston Globe blog, Christopher Shea mentions how he almost turned Professor Schnittker into Professor Schnitzer. (And I almost made the same mistake while editing this. Jesus!) Less humorously, a Cupertino-like havoc was caused by Excel, which changed the names of some genes that looked like dates—so DEC1 was renamed 1-DEC— making this tumor-suppressing gene irretrievable by searches.

Speaking of names, they are particularly vulnerable to being Cupertino’d. According to some errors that popped up last year, Barack Obama did not defeat John McCain, but John Moccasin did lose to Barack Boatman. Ron Paul, Mike Huckabee, and Sam Brownback occasionally were transformed into Rot Paul, Mike Hoecake, and Sam Blowback, names more appropriate for movie stars in various genres. Visual Thesaurus Executive Producer Ben Zimmer has been a prime Cupertino collector, bringing many whacked-out examples to light. My favorites are Lord Voltmeter (Harry Potter’s Lord Voldemort) and Muttonhead Quail Movement (Pakistan’s Muttahida Quami Movement).

I went fishing for Cupertinos myself, with one of my favorite names as bait: Plaxico Burress, or as I prefer to think of him, “the Rosa Parks of people who have shot themselves in the thigh in a nightclub,” as dubbed by Stephen Colbert. Word 2007 offers Plaice, (a type of flatfish) as the first suggestion for Plaxico, and sure enough, there are many examples of Plaice Burress on the web, and even a few that muck up his first and last name, calling the wide receiver Plaice Burrs.

These errors are a good argument for writer’s paranoia: Don’t trust your computer. Never let it do important stuff automatically. All features of word processing programs need to be monitored; some, like grammar check, are so unreliable that they deserve to be thrown off a cliff just before a boulder is thrown off the same cliff. As Mike Hoecake could tell you, if he existed, even something as wonderfully useful as spellchecker can make your readers laugh for the wrong reason.

While I doubt the Cupertino chamber of commerce is excited that the city is synonymous with an error, I have a suggestion that may boost the city’s image to loftier heights. Much like time-travelers, language columnists are supposed to observe and not meddle, but I have an idea that yearns to fly out of the moth’s nest of my mind: I think we should take a cue from those original goofs and deliberately use Cupertino as a synonym for cooperation.

‘Cause, come on, cooperation sounds pretty lame for such an essential of life; it could use a rebranding campaign, just like those sea kittens. Why not embrace the synonym that our computer overlords have forced on us?

I hope I can count on your Cupertino in this matter (and in sharing any Cupertino goofs of your own in comments).

  • Filed under: Blog : Wordtastic
  • Share
  • Discuss
  • Mark it good!
  • Facebook
  •   Twitter
  • Digg
  • Stumble
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
Direct link to this post:
Send as an Email:
Your email address:
Recipient's email address:
Message:

X
DISCUSSION: 254 Comments
    • Posted by: Anonymous
    • on January 30, 2009 at 11:04 am

    Our library’s public computers are called infostations.  Naturally, our reports about them are full of infestations.  Some of my colleagues think that’s a more accurate description of them anyway.  – Jennifer, aka gynophore.

    • Posted by: thinkbolt
    • on January 31, 2009 at 1:00 pm

    In the early 1990s, I used to cover the USA women’s gymnastics national team, a member of which was a girl named Agina Simpkins. My spellchecker always changed her to “angina symptoms.”

    • Posted by: Anonymous
    • on February 3, 2009 at 1:46 pm

    An ex-coworker named Patricia (Trish for short) found it hilarious that Word always changed her name to “Trash.” She stopped laughing when she missed it just once… after a very important email was sent to the entire department!

    • Posted by: Anonymous
    • on February 3, 2009 at 5:16 pm

    A popular poem on ‘the internets’Spell Checker Poem

    Eye halve a spelling chequer It came with my pea sea
    It plainly marques four my revue Miss steaks eye kin knot sea.

    Eye strike a key and type a word And weight four it two say
    Weather eye am wrong oar write It shows me strait a weigh.
    As soon as a mist ache is maid It nose bee fore two long
    And eye can put the error rite Its rare lea ever wrong.
    Eye have run this poem threw it I am shore your pleased two no
    Its letter perfect awl the weigh My chequer tolled me sew.

    -Sauce unknown
    —

    • Posted by: Anonymous
    • on February 4, 2009 at 1:55 pm

    yeah I totally snt the same example from the title to my boss the other day…

    • Posted by: Anonymous
    • on February 10, 2009 at 4:22 am

    Be careful with “public”…we’ve learned spellcheck will accept ”pubic”.

    • Posted by: Anonymous
    • on February 10, 2009 at 4:28 am

    Yes it is true. Dam spell checker is the dictionary for lazy people.Reader  

    • Posted by: Anonymous
    • on February 10, 2009 at 4:36 am

    I actually just got an apology for incontinence last month. I though to myself, “Is she being a smart *#%? Or is she just stupid?”  Now I know. It was her spellchecker! How funny!

    • Posted by: Anonymous
    • on February 10, 2009 at 4:38 am

    I’m really feeling incontinent! Too funny! ‘angina symptoms’ ‘infestations’ ROFLMAO

    • Posted by: Anonymous
    • on February 10, 2009 at 4:46 am

    I would like to think that most people already knew this, but who knows….Anyway, proofreading the “old-fashioned” way is much better than a spell checker. Obviously.

    • Posted by: Anonymous
    • on February 10, 2009 at 4:47 am

    Thinkbolt: That is hilarious!! :)

    • Posted by: Anonymous
    • on February 10, 2009 at 5:35 am

    Imagine my horror when I read the Christmas Eve Church Service Program in which I had listed the well-known carl “Angels We Have Hard On High”  It pays to proofread!

    • Posted by: Anonymous
    • on February 10, 2009 at 6:02 am

    In Africa the problem is much worse with place and people’s names multilated at random. I guess we all have to live with it.

    • Posted by: Anonymous
    • on February 10, 2009 at 6:08 am

    As an Army Wife of a deployed soldier, I have several friends who also have husbands are deployed. The day after the guys left, I noticed one of my friends had posted a blog the night before about her husband leaving. It was rather sad and heartfelt, most especially the part that she just couldn’t handle the way his “colon lingered behind”. I’m sure she meant cologne, however, I still can’t bring myself to ever bring it.

    • Posted by: Anonymous
    • on February 10, 2009 at 6:11 am

    A co-worker wanted to show appreciation to an overseas contact after meetings abroad by writing “Dear Roy…First of all, thank you for your kind hospitality”  except the spellchecker converted it to:            Dear Roy, Fairest of all, thank you for your kind hostility.

    • Posted by: Anonymous
    • on February 10, 2009 at 6:31 am

    I actually run a site that has thousands of funny medical chart bloopers. A large amount of them come from transcriptionists’ spell check and from their macros.  I call them Chart Farts (R) and you can see them at http://ChartFarts.com  A shameless plug, I know, but very, very relevant.

    • Posted by: Anonymous
    • on February 10, 2009 at 6:45 am

    A mail to someone called Scott got changed to Scoot – which happened to be the nickname his mum used for him.  It totally confused him.  Most embarassing was when a mail to someone called Wenjie was addressed as Wiener….

    • Posted by: Anonymous
    • on February 10, 2009 at 6:50 am

    I wish you were her……instead of I wish you where here

    • Posted by: Anonymous
    • on February 10, 2009 at 6:51 am

    YOU DON’T KNOW BUT i REALLY REALLY THINK THAT THERE IS TOOO MANY PEOPLE ON THIS POOR EARTH,,CAN’T PROVIDE,, PEOPLE KEEP MAKING BABIES EVEN THOUGH THEY CAN’T AFFORD THEM AND THEY DON’T GIVE A S..

    • Posted by: Anonymous
    • on February 10, 2009 at 7:17 am

    Bloody hell! If you’re an Australian using Spell Checker (usually with American syntax) it’s twice as hard! :P Must say I’ve had a right giggle over some of the stories though.

    • Posted by: Anonymous
    • on February 10, 2009 at 7:28 am

    Back in college, I was on a management case study, and one of my teammates recommendations was to open a whorehouse in Chicago, with the ability to move X amount of units per hour, with the capacity to stack Y amounts of product, and the whorehouse would be able to drive our expansion into the midwest… uh… shouldn’t that be warehouse???  Our prof was pretty impressed with our change of operations when we gave him a copy of the original work.

    • Posted by: Anonymous
    • on February 10, 2009 at 7:30 am

    lame

    • Posted by: Anonymous
    • on February 10, 2009 at 7:33 am

    The Spell Checker is not the problem at all. It is the loose nut behind the keyboard that is the problem. If your use of language sucks, then the Spell Checker can not correct that.

    • Posted by: Anonymous
    • on February 10, 2009 at 7:35 am

    Another problem is that if you leave one letter out of a word, it is more than likely still a legitimate word. Just not the one you intended.

    • Posted by: Anonymous
    • on February 10, 2009 at 7:40 am

    I worked in a quality control department of a courier company for a few years and occasionally we had to write apology letters of which we had some standard formats to work from.  One of them was clearly altered at some point creating the spellcheck error of a  ’gesture of goodwill’ turning into a ‘jester of goodwill’ – it didn’t sound very sincere in our apologies!

1 2 3 ... 11
Login or Sign up to discuss this article

Related Content

  • Blog : GOOD Blog

    FEMA's Fake Press Conference

    You may have heard about this over the weekend. FEMA held a fake press conference about its handling ...
    Read & Discuss

  • Blog : GOOD Blog

    Function Follows Form

    This new tilting bookshelf puts form and style way above function. It doesn't totally fail as a ...
    Read & Discuss

  • Blog : GOOD Blog

    Bummers

    Larry Summers, we hardly knew ye. Strangely controversial Harvard President Larry Summers has stepped down because, well, he was sick ...
    Read & Discuss

  • Blog : GOOD Blog

    Newt-o Hablo Espanol

    There is a rumor that Penelope Cruz learns the lines for her English movies phonetically. She is much better than ...
    Read & Discuss

  • Blog : Wordtastic

    What, Me Sorry?

    What made Mark Sanford and David Letterman’s public apologies work. There are many great things about not being a ...
    Read & Discuss

Recent Readers

  • Isis Krause
  • lizzyl
  • ChristineTan
  • okamanda
  • mikebrand
  • AutumnWindz
  • superfamous
  • Dino Ianniello
  • AdriLu5
  • kiana.thecliche
  • Jordan Ruden
  • Tait Reimers
See all

This Week In Blogs

  • Most Discussed
  • Most GOODMarked
  1. How Thanksgiving Got Its Turkey
  2. Is Newsweek’s Sarah Palin Cover Sexist?
  3. The Culture of the Interrobang
  4. Transparency: The Effects of Bike Commuting on Obesity
  5. The GOOD 100: Cowpooling
  6. Sad or Cute: Hermit Crab Makes Home in Broken Bottle
  7. Are You Raising a Furkid?
  8. The Charter for Compassion
  9. Charging Forward with Mission Motor’s Electric Superbike
  10. How Many Books Do You Read Each Year?
  1. The Charter for Compassion
  2. New School: How the Web Liberalized Liberal Arts Education
  3. The GOOD Guide to COP15: The Fire this Time: Copenhagen and the War for the Future
  4. The Kids Are All Right
  5. Picture Show: Breach
  6. The Culture of the Interrobang
  7. Picture Show: Four Days in Dubai
  8. Singularity 101: What Is the Singularity?
  9. EyeWriter: Paralyzed Artist Draws with His Eyes
  10. Charging Forward with Mission Motor’s Electric Superbike

GOOD Magazine
About
|
Join
|
Sign In

Categories

  • Business
  • Cities
  • Culture
  • Design
  • Education
  • Environment
  • Food
  • Health
  • Media
  • People
  • Politics
  • Technology
  • Transportation

Special Features

  • Blogs
  • Events
  • Infographics
  • Look
  • Picture Show
  • Q&A
  • Video

Community

  • Community Board
  • Member directory
  • Join the Community

Social

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
  • Flickr

Magazine

  • Current issue
  • Back issues
  • Subscribe
  • Gift a gift
  • Renew/Service

GOOD

  • What is GOOD?
  • Make GOOD better
© GOOD Worldwide LLC. - all rights reserved
  • Company details
  • Contact
  • Advertise
  • Careers
  • RSS
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Powered by Verkata