Hillary Clinton just named Todd Stern to be America’s “climate envoy.” Stern is a lawyer and Senior Fellow at the Center for American Progress. He helped negotiate the original Kyoto Protocol agreement during the Clinton Administration.The scope of the “climate envoy” job isn’t entirely clear, but we can assume Stern will-at the least-be in charge of representing the U.S. in international climate negotiations (like the especially important ones coming up in Copenhagen in December 2009). Stern seems to have the right sense of urgency:This is no time to indulge in orthodoxies or in the kind of overextended discussion that marked too much of the six-year Kyoto Protocol negotiation. As the United Kingdom’s climate envoy, John Ashton, said recently, “We now need to stop talking about talking and start deciding about doing.” The next president should approach this issue the way President Franklin Roosevelt approached the Great Depression: in a spirit of restless experimentation.Some people in “green” circles are starting to worry that Stern’s job will overlap in a counterproductive way with those of Energy Secretary Steven Chu and “Assistant to the President for Energy and Climate Change” Carol Browner. From my perspective, three high-level people working on climate change doesn’t sound like a confusing surplus, especially given their different backgrounds. At any rate, we certainly didn’t get very far with the opposite approach under Bush. Does anybody even know who represented the U.S. in climate negotiations during the Bush Administration?
Tags
advertisement
More for You
-
14 images of badass women who destroyed stereotypes and inspired future generations
These trailblazers redefined what a woman could be.
Throughout history, women have stood up and fought to break down barriers imposed on them from stereotypes and societal expectations. The trailblazers in these photos made history and redefined what a woman could be. In doing so, they paved the way for future generations to stand up and continue to fight for equality.
-
Why mass shootings spawn conspiracy theories
Mass shootings and conspiracy theories have a long history.
While conspiracy theories are not limited to any topic, there is one type of event that seems particularly likely to spark them: mass shootings, typically defined as attacks in which a shooter kills at least four other people.
When one person kills many others in a single incident, particularly when it seems random, people naturally seek out answers for why the tragedy happened. After all, if a mass shooting is random, anyone can be a target.
Pointing to some nefarious plan by a powerful group – such as the government – can be more comforting than the idea that the attack was the result of a disturbed or mentally ill individual who obtained a firearm legally.
advertisement

