Should Distracted Walking Be Illegal?

Hawaiian lawmakers want people to stop staring at their phones while crossing the street.

Image via Jan Vašek

Aren’t smartphones great? You can use them to look at Rihanna GIFs during meetings, bathroom breaks, flights across the country, walks through the urban metropolis in blissful ignorance of the surrounding vastness of human life, wherever! Unfortunately, the latter scenario can put you in the hospital.

In fact, more pedestrians are injured each year while using their phones than drivers, according to a 2013 study published in Accident Analysis & Prevention. There were 1,506 incidents in 2010. Yet while distracted driving laws exist across the United States—46 states ban texting while driving, 14 ban all handheld phone use—distracted walking remains largely unregulated.

Proposals to ban the use of electronics in intersections have failed on the state level in New York, Arkansas, and Utah. Only Fort Lee, New Jersey ($85 fine for texting while crossing the street), and Salt Lake City, Utah ($50 fine for talking on the phone, listening to headphones, or texting while crossing rail tracks), have successfully implemented distracted walking policies.

American officials have instead relied on public awareness marketing to promote more responsible walking, such as San Francisco’s billboards asking, “Do you want Beethoven to be the last thing you hear?,” Delaware’s zombie-themed “Don’t join the walking dead” campaign, and Philadelphia’s “e-lane” prank, which sarcastically designated sidewalk space for pedestrians glued to their phones.

Members of Hawaii’s House of Representatives hope to buck the trend. House Bill 2723, House Bill 2723, introduced in January, proposes to fine pedestrians $250 for crossing streets, roads, and highways while using a mobile electronic device. The House Committee on Transportation passed the bill last week, recommending it for review by the Judicial Committee. “It is just another measure to ensure the safety of our pedestrians,” State Representative Sharon Har told Hawaii News Now.

via Barry Schapiro / Twitter

The phrase "stay in your lane" is usually lobbed at celebrities who talk about politics on Twitter by people who disagree with them. People in the sports world will often get a "stick to sports" when they try to have an opinion that lies outside of the field of play.

Keep Reading

The Free the Nipple movement is trying to remove the stigma on women's breasts by making it culturally acceptable and legal for women to go topless in public. But it turns out, Free the Nipple might be fighting on the wrong front and should be focusing on freeing the nipple in a place you'd never expect. Your own home.

A woman in Utah is facing criminal charges for not wearing a shirt in her house, with prosecutors arguing that women's chests are culturally considered lewd.

Keep Reading

In August, the Recording Academy hired their first female CEO, Deborah Dugan. Ten days before the Grammys, Dugan was placed on administrative leave for misconduct allegations after a female employee said Dugan was "abusive" and created a "toxic and intolerable" work environment. However, Dugan says she was actually removed from her position for complaining to human resources about sexual harassment, pay disparities, and conflicts of interest in the award show's nomination process.

Just five days before the Grammys, Dugan filed a complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and her claims are many. Dugan says she was paid less than former CEO Neil Portnow. In 2018, Portnow received criticism for saying women need to "step up" when only two female acts won Grammys. Portnow decided to not renew his contract shortly after. Dugan says she was also asked to hire Portnow as a consultant for $750,000 a year, which she refused to do.

Keep Reading