Food for Thinkers: Evan Kleiman on How Cooking and Feeding Expresses Humanity

Evan Kleiman, host of KCRW's Good Food radio show, argues that food writing "is an intellectual and emotional funnel" to life's fundamental issues.

Chef, cookbook author, Slow Food Los Angeles founder, and host of KCRW's must-listen weekly Good Food radio show, Evan Kleiman is a food-world legend in Southern California and beyond. Her response to the Food for Thinkers conversation is a heartfelt argument for the importance of food writing.

From her post, it's clear that food has meant a lot to Kleiman, as a way "to learn to cook, learn about the world, make friends, build self-esteem, be social, create networks, and most importantly for me personally, give wing to dreams and intellect."

But beyond its importance in her own life, Kleiman argues that we should all be reading, talking, and thinking about food:

Writing about food has the ability to connect the corporeal, the intellectual and the spiritual worlds we inhabit. That’s why food writing is so important now. The different expressions of the discipline have the ability to connect the mundane to the vitally important. For how we feed ourselves, in the 21st century, in the first world, is a choice that has huge moral consequences. For many, the idea that it's a choice may be news. For most, daily eating is a choice of the default, i.e. the industrial or "Big Ag." There is no intention connected to it. And yet choosing the default today with the knowledge we have of the general unsustainability of current food systems is almost an amoral choice.

So reading food writing is essential. It encourages you to think about many seemingly disconnected threads that we weave into a whole. Whether that whole is sustainable and delicious or horrifying and degenerative is a choice. And it can all begin with a bite of something you love and a few well chosen words on a page.


Head over to KCRW's Good Food blog to read Kleiman's passionate post in full. Meanwhile, don't miss Rachel Laudan's earlier Food for Thinkers post, on the benefits of today's food system over our wholly organic past—and then step up to join in the debate yourself.

Food for Thinkers is a week-long, distributed, online conversation looking at food writing from as wide and unusual a variety of perspectives as possible. Between January 18 and January 23, 2011, more than 40 food and non-food writers will respond to a question posed by GOOD's newly-launched Food hub: What does—or could, or even should—it mean to write about food today?

Follow the conversation all week here at GOOD, join in the comments, and use the Twitter hashtag #foodforthinkers to keep up to date.

via Barry Schapiro / Twitter

The phrase "stay in your lane" is usually lobbed at celebrities who talk about politics on Twitter by people who disagree with them. People in the sports world will often get a "stick to sports" when they try to have an opinion that lies outside of the field of play.

Keep Reading

The Free the Nipple movement is trying to remove the stigma on women's breasts by making it culturally acceptable and legal for women to go topless in public. But it turns out, Free the Nipple might be fighting on the wrong front and should be focusing on freeing the nipple in a place you'd never expect. Your own home.

A woman in Utah is facing criminal charges for not wearing a shirt in her house, with prosecutors arguing that women's chests are culturally considered lewd.

Keep Reading

In August, the Recording Academy hired their first female CEO, Deborah Dugan. Ten days before the Grammys, Dugan was placed on administrative leave for misconduct allegations after a female employee said Dugan was "abusive" and created a "toxic and intolerable" work environment. However, Dugan says she was actually removed from her position for complaining to human resources about sexual harassment, pay disparities, and conflicts of interest in the award show's nomination process.

Just five days before the Grammys, Dugan filed a complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and her claims are many. Dugan says she was paid less than former CEO Neil Portnow. In 2018, Portnow received criticism for saying women need to "step up" when only two female acts won Grammys. Portnow decided to not renew his contract shortly after. Dugan says she was also asked to hire Portnow as a consultant for $750,000 a year, which she refused to do.

Keep Reading