Data for GOOD Lifestyle

The First Humans to Live to the Age of 150 Are Already Alive

by Jordan E. Rosenfeld

July 30, 2015

Human lifespans are now longer than ever. Currently, the average 65-year-old can expect to live an additional 19.3 years compared to just 1950, when their same-age counterpart would only live approximately 13 more years, according to the National Institute on Aging. And the population of adults 85 and older is projected to increase 351 percent by 2050. Think that’s astonishing? The first humans expected to live to age 150 are already alive, according to experts on aging and longevity.

At first glance this is a mind-blowing projection, until you consider the record holder for longest recorded age, France’s Jeanne Louise Calment, who lived to 122, and more adults are living well past 110. Astonishing or not, longer life will force people to rethink how (and how long) they work, and focus more on increasing the quality of these longer lives rather than rushing to retirement in their relatively spry 60s.

“We are at this huge historical event where people are living longer than they have ever lived, and our lifespans have practically doubled,” says Tamara Sims, a research psychologist at Stanford’s Lifespan Development Lab. “My mentor Laura Carstensen talks about redesigning the model and expanding our definition of middle age. It requires a cultural change, no easy task.”

One such way to redesign the model, Sims suggests, is rather than working furiously until the “magic age” of 62.5 (the earliest you can access social security benefits without penalties), people could “borrow time from their golden years.” This means people would work less in the early years—maybe part time—to raise families, pursue creative goals, and stay healthy, with the awareness that they’ll work longer than their parents and grandparents. 

While it may be “too late” for the Boomers to borrow much time, millennials, the cohort of Americans who are approximately 18-32 years old, might just be the perfect generation at the perfect time to get on top of their work-life balance. There are approximately 87 million* of them, surpassing the Baby Boomers in number, and comprising approximately one-third of US population. And while they’ve gotten a bad rap for having a sense of entitlement to do what they want when they want it, the economic downturn in 2008, often called The Great Recession, forced them to focus on their careers as a priority over life events their grandparents would have already achieved by their age, such as marriage, kids, and buying homes.

With everyone living longer, and 10,000 more boomers retiring every day—83.1 million boomers by 2050—the notion of social security being available to everyone grows ever slimmer. Millennials and younger generations will be forced to find motivation to work longer, but smarter.

Dawn Carr, a social science gerontologist in Stanford’s Center on Longevity hopes to raise awareness that the Baby Boomers’ model of retirement won’t fly for future generations. “It’s not realistic to think you’ll spend thirty years working to finance sixty years of life,” she says. 

Carr suggests that younger people may want to put more thought into selecting careers that “allow you to grow and develop over a long time. You may want to recognize that your work life very well should continue much later than we’ve been conceiving. Meaningful work can give you purpose and value, and enhance later life.”

Moreover, there are important health reasons to consider working beyond the age of 65. People who engage in meaningful work of some kind after retirement, for pay or as a volunteer, have better outcomes for health and emotional well-being in later life.

Tamara Sims reinforces the importance of staying active. “When people retire, if they go from working a lot to not working at all, or if they are forced into retirement, we see some decline in cognitive and emotional well-being.”

Perhaps a “restructuring” of work could allow for more innovation and freedom, as well; millennials are already a highly entrepreneurial bunch. And the economy will need them to be at their best given their sheer numbers—they will power the labor force for decades to come.

Andrew Reed, a postdoctoral scholar who splits his time between Stanford’s Center on Longevity and the Lifespan Development lab adds, “Maybe giving younger adults a time where they don’t have a 9-5 job, to raise kids, or chase some of their passions, could be an interesting way to give them some quasi-experience with retirement before they get there.”

This might include the recent trend of taking a “gap year” for graduates fresh out of college before they jump into the work force.

People may think they are only going to live another ten to fifteen years in retirement,” says Reed, “but it could be an entire third phase of your life that is potentially equal in [time] to the first two.” With longer life comes a need for greater creativity, now and well into the future.

Illustration by Tom Eichacker

*This number has been corrected.

Throughout 2015, we're partnering with Progressive to harness the power of information. Each week, we'll put data under the microscope, asking how statistics and research can empower us to challenge our understanding of ourselves and the ways we navigate our world. Knowledge is the first step on the way to progress: Let's take this information and drive change in the world together. This is Data for GOOD.

— Like us on Facebook to get more GOOD —
The First Humans to Live to the Age of 150 Are Already Alive