In California, Green Jobs Are Recession-Proof

While California’s overall economy took a 7 percent hit, the green economy shrunk by only 3 percent.

Last summer, the Brookings Institution came up with a figure for our country's ever-elusive green workforce: America supports 2.7 million jobs in the clean energy economy. And in California, at least, jobs like these have proven more resilient to the economic downturn. What Next 10, a nonprofit focused on California’s future, says the “core green economy” did shrink during the recession (from 2009 to 2010, more specifically). But while California’s overall economy took a 7 percent hit, the green economy shrunk by only 3 percent.

While any job loss hurts, some sectors of the green economy—like energy infrastructure, clean transportation, and energy generation—grew during tough economic times. Next 10 also looked at longer term growth, and found that the green economy has been shooting past the economy as a whole, growing 53 percent since 1995 (in that time, the economy grew 12 percent overall). As the report puts it, “While the downturn reset core green employment back to 2008 levels, total state employment was set back to 2001 levels.” That means the green job sector has less ground to recover before it surpasses its former level and gains new strength.

In other words, green jobs have staying power. They’re not in luxury industries that dissipate when times get tough. On the contrary, green industries become more attractive economic opportunities in times of downturn, since they promise cost savings and resilience in the face of rising costs. These green economy jobs also stretch across skill and income levels. People working in this resilient area are electricians and environmental scientist, building managers and architects, Chief Sustainability Officers and landfill gas generation system technicians.

And functionally, the number of Americans working toward sustainable goals is likely higher. The “core green economy” that Next 10 is measuring covers sectors that provide alternative energy, conserve energy or resources, and reduce pollution—the green activities that have the most potential to make a real environmental impact. The 15 specific industries studied include energy efficiency, air and environment work, waste and wastewater, finance and investment, clean manufacturing, and green building. But this core green economy does not include what Next 10 calls the “adaptive green economy”—work by businesses, NGOs, and households to apply principles of sustainability to their daily operations.

As green principles and green jobs infiltrate the economy as a whole, it may no longer be true that green jobs are more recession-proof than average jobs. But right now, there’s enough recognition that we need to be doing this work (and that it’s profitable to do it) that companies and investors are betting on green jobs more strongly than they are on any old gig. That’s true even while financial resources are scarce. As economic growth resumes, we can expect sustainable growth to have that much bigger a share of it.

Photo via (cc) Flickr user USDAgov

via Barry Schapiro / Twitter

The phrase "stay in your lane" is usually lobbed at celebrities who talk about politics on Twitter by people who disagree with them. People in the sports world will often get a "stick to sports" when they try to have an opinion that lies outside of the field of play.

Keep Reading

The Free the Nipple movement is trying to remove the stigma on women's breasts by making it culturally acceptable and legal for women to go topless in public. But it turns out, Free the Nipple might be fighting on the wrong front and should be focusing on freeing the nipple in a place you'd never expect. Your own home.

A woman in Utah is facing criminal charges for not wearing a shirt in her house, with prosecutors arguing that women's chests are culturally considered lewd.

Keep Reading

In August, the Recording Academy hired their first female CEO, Deborah Dugan. Ten days before the Grammys, Dugan was placed on administrative leave for misconduct allegations after a female employee said Dugan was "abusive" and created a "toxic and intolerable" work environment. However, Dugan says she was actually removed from her position for complaining to human resources about sexual harassment, pay disparities, and conflicts of interest in the award show's nomination process.

Just five days before the Grammys, Dugan filed a complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and her claims are many. Dugan says she was paid less than former CEO Neil Portnow. In 2018, Portnow received criticism for saying women need to "step up" when only two female acts won Grammys. Portnow decided to not renew his contract shortly after. Dugan says she was also asked to hire Portnow as a consultant for $750,000 a year, which she refused to do.

Keep Reading