With the long awaited debate between Sarah Palin and Joe Biden mere hours away, various media outlets are on the look-out for what’s to come.BBC, that venerable institution that buffers its American news with Atlantic-sized critical distance, expects gaffes. It cites, among other things, Biden’s anachronistic Roosevelt-TV-stock-market-crash meltdown and Palin’s oft-evasively-vague answers to specific questions as fodder. More after the jump.Fox News rightly questions whether Palin is up against even more media bias than usual given Gwen Ifill’s current book project, ultimately concluding that a slant may work to the governor’s advantage. Also on the topic of the moderator, Hot Air explains that while Palin has to attack assumptions behind Ifill’s questions, Biden has the more difficult task: giving “the appearance of jabbing while trying to throw haymakers.”Politico expects Palin to be the one who comes out swinging.NYTimes juxtaposes the debate with 1984’s Ferraro-Bush confrontation, the most-watched veep debate in history.Radar, also referencing 1984, concludes that Palin has the debate in the bag, so long as she “shows up” and doesn’t “emit a long string of drool from her mouth when asked a question.”Finally, Jezebel takes a more creative approach, positing that Biden won’t wear pants.What do you expect?UPDATE: Gawker weighs in to “disagree with everyone on earth,” assured of a Biden victory. NYTimes bolsters its coverage with a bunch of deep-probing veep-questions from big thinkers. The questions are surely better than the ones we’ll hear tonight, and are definitely worth a read. Spoiler alert: the editors don’t include imagined answers.
Tags
advertisement
More for You
-
14 images of badass women who destroyed stereotypes and inspired future generations
These trailblazers redefined what a woman could be.
Throughout history, women have stood up and fought to break down barriers imposed on them from stereotypes and societal expectations. The trailblazers in these photos made history and redefined what a woman could be. In doing so, they paved the way for future generations to stand up and continue to fight for equality.
-
Why mass shootings spawn conspiracy theories
Mass shootings and conspiracy theories have a long history.
While conspiracy theories are not limited to any topic, there is one type of event that seems particularly likely to spark them: mass shootings, typically defined as attacks in which a shooter kills at least four other people.
When one person kills many others in a single incident, particularly when it seems random, people naturally seek out answers for why the tragedy happened. After all, if a mass shooting is random, anyone can be a target.
Pointing to some nefarious plan by a powerful group – such as the government – can be more comforting than the idea that the attack was the result of a disturbed or mentally ill individual who obtained a firearm legally.
advertisement

