What the Government Shutdown Taught Me About Culture in DC

For 16 days, culture nearly died in our nation’s capitol. As the shutdown began, most news stories focused on how absurd it was that our government had crumbled under pressure from ultra-right wing conservatives. Yes, the Tea Party had successfully taken control of Republicans, shut down our government, and put thousands of federal employees out of work. But there was something else they tried to accomplish as well—they shut down our cultural heritage.

I work at the Library of Congress, one of the lesser-known historic federal institutions in Washington, D.C. In fact, it is the oldest federal cultural institution, out-dating the Smithsonian. In addition to the original personal library of Thomas Jefferson and the Gutenberg Bible, the Library’s collection houses prints, photographs, manuscripts, books, and maps—with a focus on items emblematic of our American culture.

When the shutdown began, the Library of Congress, the National Gallery, and all Smithsonian Museums were closed. Despite the throngs of inconvenienced tourists unable to see the exhibitions, the institutions themselves ceased to operate. No rare books were preserved, no artifacts were archived, no photographs digitized, no collections curated. All research at the Library of Congress came to a halt.

A library is more than just a collection of books and artifacts; it represents a collective cultural identity. Shutting down access to a cultural heritage institution barred people from experiencing their own personal history. I remember reading an article about Saad Eskander, the Director of Baghdad's national library, and his struggle to re-build the Iraqi people’s cultural heritage following the collapse of Saddam Hussein’s regime. In the midst of the chaos, more than 60 percent of the archives and a quarter of the collections were destroyed, burned, or stolen. Hundreds of years of history lost in an instant.

Okay, yes, it might seem a bit extreme to compare war-torn Iraq with the government shutdown— but there is a larger point I want to stress. Congressional Republicans have already urged ending federal support for arts and humanities agencies and cutting funding for Public Broadcasting. But our shared national culture is something Republicans and Democrats have in common, so we need to keep it open and forever evolving.

So how does one keep culture alive in a district defined by the government?

The frustration with Congress aside, being furloughed did make me more aware of the collective generosity and cultural heritage of DC. During the shutdown, cultural arts centers and private museums such as The Kennedy Center’s Millennium Stage, The National Geographic Museum, and The National Museum of Women in the Arts offered free admission for furloughed workers. And there were other ways that DC kept its unique culture alive during the shutdown. DC is usually characterized as a throng of career-obsessed workaholics, and businesses in the area, from lunch trucks to yoga centers, are dependent upon the patronage of these people. When the government shut down, people who were out of work had more time to enjoy and appreciate our district’s unique cultural offerings. We got the chance to stop to hear the jazz musicians outside DuPont Circle or listen to a poetry slam on the corner of 14th and U. Strangers talked to other strangers at coffee shops and food carts.

Daily life in DC has pretty much returned to normal, and yet will truly never be the same. The fight for cultural identity goes beyond keeping museums, cultural centers and public radio open and thriving. It means supporting local theater, galleries, art and music programs for children. It means people connecting with one another and starting conversations. My hope for post-shutdown DC is that people will continue to make those connections, support these causes, and show Congress that we intend to keep our cultural heritage alive.

via GOOD / YouTube

Last Friday, millions of people in 150 countries across the globe took to the streets to urge world leaders to enact dramatic solutions to combat climate change.

The Climate Strike was inspired, in part, by Greta Thunberg, a 16-year-old girl from Sweden who has captured worldwide attention for her tireless work to hold lawmakers responsible for the climate crisis.

The strike gave people across the planet the opportunity to make their voices heard before the U.N. General Assembly Climate Summit in New York City on Monday.

Keep Reading Show less
The Planet
Julian Meehan

Young leaders from around the world are gathering at the United Nations Headquarters in New York Saturday to address arguably the most urgent issue of our time. The Youth Climate Summit comes on the heels of an international strike spearheaded by Greta Thunberg, the 16-year-old climate activist from Sweden, who arrived in New York via emissions-free sailboat earlier this month.

Translated from Swedish, "berg" means "mountain," so it may feel fated that a young woman with Viking blood in her veins and summit in her name would be at the helm. But let's go out on a limb and presume Thunberg, in keeping with most activists, would chafe at the notion of pre-ordained "destiny," and rightly so. Destiny is passive — it happens to you. It's also egomaniacal. Change, on the other hand, is active; you have to fight. And it is humble. "We need to get angry and understand what is at stake," Thunberg declared. "And then we need to transform that anger into action."

This new generation of activists' most pernicious enemy is denial. The people in charge — complacent politicians and corporation heads who grossly benefit from maintaining the status quo — are buffered from real-life consequences of climate change. But millions of people don't share that privilege. For them, climate change isn't an abstract concept, but a daily state of emergency, whether it comes in the form of "prolonged drought in sub-Saharan Africa…devastating tropical storms sweeping across Southeast Asia, the Caribbean and the Pacific…[or] heatwaves and wildfires," as Amnesty International reportsare all too real problems people are facing on a regular basis.

RELATED: Greta Thunberg urges people to turn to nature to combat climate change

Keep Reading Show less
The Planet
Climate Action Tracker

In 2016, 196 countries signed the Paris Agreement, pledging to combat climate change by taking action to curb the increase in global temperatures. The Paris Agreement requires countries to report on their emissions and what steps they're taking to implement those plans. Now that the countries are coming together again for the U.N. Climate Action Summit in New York City, it's worth taking a look at what kind of progress they've made.

The Climate Action Trackerkeeps tabs on what each country is doing to limit warming, and if they're meeting their self-set goals. Countries are graded based on whether or not their actions would help limit warming to 1.5 degrees C.

According to a recent article from National Geographic, The Gambia, Morocco, and India are at the head of the class. "Even though carbon emissions in The Gambia, Morocco, and India are expected to rise, they'll fall short of exceeding the 1.5-degree Celsius limit," the article reads. Saudi Arabia, Russia and the United States, on the other hand, get a big fat F. "Projected emissions in Saudi Arabia, Russia, and the United States are far greater than what it would take to limit warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius."

Keep Reading Show less
The Planet

September 20th marks the beginning of a pivotal push for the future of our planet. The Global Climate Strike will set the stage for the United Nations Climate Action Summit, where more than 60 nations are expected to build upon their commitment to 2015's Paris Agreement for combating climate change.

Millions of people are expected to take part in an estimated 4,000 events across 130 countries.

Keep Reading Show less
The Planet
Ottawa Humane Society / Flickr

The Trump Administration won't be remembered for being kind to animals.

In 2018, it launched a new effort to reinstate cruel hunting practices in Alaska that had been outlawed under Obama. Hunters will be able to shoot hibernating bear cubs, murder wolf and coyote cubs while in their dens, and use dogs to hunt black bears.

Efforts to end animal cruelty by the USDA have been curtailed as well. In 2016, under the Obama Administration, the USDA issued 4,944 animal welfare citations, in two years the numbers dropped to just 1,716.

Keep Reading Show less