There is no easy solution for the NBA when it comes to potential protests that could take place during the national anthem. Commissioner Adam Silver and NBPA president Michele Roberts have encouraged players to speak out on issues and get involved with political causes. In a portion of the letter that was made public by ESPN, they promised that “the Players Association and the League are always available to help you figure out the most meaningful way to make [a] difference.”


But of course, they would prefer it if said activism didn’t occur on the court or, at least, not in a way the NBA and NBPA can’t properly frame and brand. Specifically, they want players to stand during the anthem.

Per NBA rules, all players have to stand, a regulation that was put to the test in 1996, when Denver Nuggets guard Mahmoud Abdul-Rauf, who was Muslim, first refused to leave the locker room, then began silently praying in a compromise after meeting with then-commissioner David Stern. Abdul-Rauf was out of the NBA two years later and remains convinced that he was blackballed.

In a memo obtained by the Washington Post, Silver reiterated that standing was mandatory and anyone who didn’t do so would face some form of discipline. He also instructed all 30 teams to lean into their already existing outreach efforts, while still speaking with players and making sure their “thoughts and ideas” are heard. There are a lot of friendly sounding words about engagement in the community and “thought leaders,” but the word “race” somehow never made it into the final draft.

The NBA also suggests this:

“​​A video tribute or PSA featuring players, community leaders, faith leaders and team leadership speaking about the issues they care about and photos from past community events.”

On Wednesday, the Dallas Mavericks and the San Antonio Spurs followed Silver’s suggestion, showing videos prior to the opening tip. The Mavericks’ version was, as the SB Nation blog MavsMoneyball described it, “strange.” That’s not the half of it. The two-minute film is narrated by a presumably sentient American flag. Yes, a flag.

This flag has watched every Mavericks game and so recounts pivotal moments in team history before saying, “I see a city and country where the people respect me for who I am and what I represent. I am this country’s common ground: the most recognizable symbol in the world.”

The flag then asks fans to rise for the national anthem.

The Spurs’ video wisely left weird jingoistic and anthropomorphic banners behind, going with a plain-text message that was blandly inclusive enough so as not to offend anyone.

Transcription via ESPN:

“There are things happening in our communities that need our attention,” the message read. “We understand your desire to attend our games as an escape and chosen form of entertainment. In that, we feel there is a significant commonality in all of us that allows our community to be so special.

That commonality should include aspirations for social justice, freedom of speech in its many forms, and equal opportunity for education, and economic advancement regardless of race, ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation or religion.

It is our hope that we can, as a community, inspire and evoke real change. We ask that you join with us in your daily lives in the pursuit of equality. And in that, we honor our country by exercising demands for what this great nation has promised and what our military continues to fight for.”



What are the “things” that require attention? What is the “real change”? How do they define “social justice”? The latter is the closest the Spurs came to a specific point, but still a far cry from what head coach Gregg Popovich told The Nation earlier this week, when he called Trump a “soulless coward” and a “pathological liar” who is actively working to divide the country.

That’s fine. Really. No one should have expected the Spurs to reprint the entirety of Ta-Nehisi Coates’ treatise on reparations, but even so, a pro team or league can’t serve as the vanguard for a protest movement. Moreover, no matter how many owners were willing to anonymously say that they sympathize with their employees, per Bleacher Report, the questions of systemic, structural racism and state-sanctioned police violence aren’t its chief concern or even a subject they really want to address at all.

The league is worried about getting embroiled in controversy or finding itself on the receiving end of a Trump tweet banged out after the president watched a misleading segment on Fox & Friends. It does not want to be seen as hostile to the large chunk of the population that will blindly lash out at any purported “enemies” of the administration. It’s ridiculous, and letting a pollster know how deeply enraged one is doesn’t necessarily make much of a dent in viewing habits, but to some degree, that’s what’s happening to the NFL.

It seems that the NBA plans to co-opt and neuter any attempts at real activism. They’ll send nice memos trying to square an unsquarable circle by trying to gently nudge players into the kind of sponsor-friendly community efforts that won’t upset any apple carts — specifically the carts belonging to their advertising partners.

Eventually, though, some player is going to do or say something that will make people uncomfortable, possibly in response to being infantilized by the NBA’s suggested courses of action and possibly during the anthem. And while Popovich might be untouchable, when a player crosses Silver’s line, we’ll see how “progressive” the NBA really is.

  • It’s a myth that baby boys are less social than girls – a new look at decades of research shows all babies are born to connect
    Photo credit: Jutta Klee/fStop via Getty ImagesBabies – whether boy or girl – look to adults for care and comfort.

    Girls and boys are equally social at birth.

    This finding, based on my team’s synthesis of six decades of research, may come as a surprise. Gender differences in adults’ social sensitivity are famous. Women outperform men at recognizing faces and emotions, and they score modestly higher on measures of empathy. They are likelier to take jobs working with people, such as in teaching and health care, whereas men are likelier to choose jobs working with “things,” such as in engineering or plumbing.

    But how early do these differences emerge, and are they a matter of evolution or social learning? For years, some theorists have argued the former: that the difference is innate, built into the brain hardware of girls and boys through Darwinian selection. But this perspective relies almost exclusively on just one high-profile, yet deeply flawed, study of 102 newborns.

    Mining the neonatal research trove

    Realizing that psychologists have been studying newborns’ social orientation for decades, my team of neurobehavioral researchers and I set out to collect all the data – every published study that has compared boys’ and girls’ attention to social stimuli in the first month of life. Our goal was to better test the hypothesis of an inborn gender difference in attention to, or interest in, other people.

    Our study was a systematic review, meaning we searched through every published report indexed in both medical and psychological databases from the 1960s onward.

    We cast a wide net, looking for any research that measured newborns’ attention to or preference for human faces or voices and that reported the data separately by gender. Importantly, we did not limit our search to the terms “gender difference” or “sex difference,” since these would bias the collection by potentially excluding studies that failed to find boy-girl differences..

    As expected, we unearthed dozens of studies comparing newborn boys and girls on social perception: 40 experiments reported in 31 peer-reviewed studies and involving nearly 2,000 infants. The majority of studies measured the amount of time newborns spent looking at faces, either at a single face or comparing a baby’s preference between two faces of differing social value, such as their own mother versus a woman who was a stranger.

    Our data collection was large enough that we were able to carry out meta-analysis, which is a statistical method for combining the results of many studies. Meta-analysis essentially turns many small studies into a single large one. For studies measuring neonates’ looking time at faces, this included 667 infants, half of them boys and half of them girls.

    a blue and a red distribution curve overlap almost completely making it look mostly purple
    Newborn boys and girls are similarly attentive to faces, with the distribution of time they spend looking almost completely overlapping. Data from Karson et al. plotted using tool at sexdifference.org.

    The result was clear: nearly identical social perception between baby boys and girls. There was no significant difference between genders overall, nor was there a difference when we focused only on studies measuring babies’ gaze duration on a single face, or only on studies measuring babies’ gaze preference between two different faces.

    Our search also netted two other types of studies. One focused on a remarkable behavior: newborns’ tendency to start crying when they hear another baby cry. An early study found this “contagious crying” to be marginally more common in girls. But when we performed meta-analysis on data across nine contagious-crying experiments, including 387 infants, there was again no solid evidence for male-female difference.

    The last dataset we analyzed compared babies’ orientation to both social and inanimate objects using a newborn behavior assessment scale developed by legendary pediatrician T. Berry Brazelton. Across four studies involving 619 infants, girls did pay somewhat greater attention to the social stimuli (a human face or voice), but they also paid more attention to the inanimate stimuli (a ball or the sound of a rattle).

    In other words, girls in this test seemed a bit more attuned to every type of stimulus, perhaps due to a general maturity advantage that they hold from fetal development through puberty. But there was nothing special about their interest in people, according to the Brazelton assessment.

    Boys, too, prefer faces

    Our findings align with other well-designed studies, including one finding that 5-month-old boys and girls equally prefer looking at faces over toy cars or other objects, and another finding that 2-month-old boys actually perform better than girls at detecting faces. So taken together, current research dispels a common myth that girls are innately “hardwired” to be more social than boys in early life.

    The truth is that all babies are wired for social engagement at birth. Boys and girls are both primed to pay attention to human faces and voices, which, after all, belong to those who will keep them fed, safe and comforted.

    Despite their best intentions, most parents cannot help but stereotype their infants by gender and begin treating boys and girls differently early on. Presuming that sons are already less social is not a recipe for remedying this bias. Our research can help dispel this myth, giving every child, male or female, the best possible start for connecting with and caring about other people.

    This article originally appeared on The Conversation. You can read it here.

  • Scientists discover that a New York cemetery is the underground home for over 5 million of bees
    Photo credit: CanvaThere is a good reason why so many bees thrive in cemeteries.

    East Lawn Cemetery in Ithaca, New York is “home” for dozens people who’ve been laid to rest. However, it is not just the home for departed humans. It is also the underground burrow housing over five million bees.

    While there have been records of bees emerging from the grounds of East Lawn Cemetery since 1935, it wasn’t until 2023 that a study of its scale was measured. In April of that year, a team at Cornell University began fieldwork by setting up 10 emergence traps made of tents over the bees’ nest. These traps collected insects in a plastic jar with a 70% ethanol solution. 

    @itsospooky

    There Are 5.6 Million Bees Living Beneath This Cemetery Beneath a quiet cemetery in New York, scientists discovered millions of bees living underground, building tunnels, pollinating, and surviving completely unnoticed for decades. While everything above changes, generations come and go, this hidden world continues without interruption, a reminder that life moves forward with or without us. #NatureMystery #DidYouKnow #HiddenWorld #ScienceFacts #creatorsearchinsights

    ♬ Sorrowful – Perfect, so dystopian

    By analyzing the number of bees caught in these traps along with other data, they calculated that as many as 5.56 million bees live in the cemetery’s ground. To put it in perspective, the typical honeybee hive contains around 30,000 bees.

    “I was completely floored when we did the calculations,” Cornell University entomologist Bryan Danforth said to Scientific American. “I have seen published estimates of bee aggregations in the hundreds of thousands. But I never really imagined that it would be 5.56 million bees.”

    Many might be puzzled about bees living underground rather than in a typical hanging hive. In actuality, though, the majority of bees live underground. The miner bees (Andrena regularis) found in the cemetery actually live solitary lives within burrows. They nest there during the winter months and emerge in the spring to pollinate, mate, and dig burrows for their larvae. For New Yorkers who enjoy apples and blueberries, these bees are responsible for helping them bloom and grow in the spring.

    “This species overwinters as adults, which is relatively rare, and that’s part of the reason why they come up out of the ground so early in spring, timed to the apple bloom,” said study author Steven T. Hoge.

    What are bees doing living at a cemetery?

    But why is the cemetery a popular living space for these bees?

    “The peacefulness, the lack of pesticides, and the fact that, overall, the ground is rarely disturbed, all make cemeteries good habitat for bees,” Danforth told Science Alert.

    Given the huge population, the Cornell University researchers state that the cemetery is actually very important for the area’s ecosystem. Should the cemetery grounds be disturbed or altered, it could impact the vegetation and crops in the surrounding areas. In fact, there are some cemeteries partnering up with beekeepers and other bee conservationists.

    Keeping the bees (and the dead) in peace

    Danforth and his colleagues have encouraged a global community science project to help the bees. The purpose is to study, protect, and conserve these ground-dwelling bees and their habitats.

    “These populations are huge, and they need protection,” Danforth said. “If we don’t preserve nest sites, and someone paves over them, we could lose in an instant 5.5 million bees that are important pollinators.”

    If you notice a bee coming out of the ground, leave it be and spread the word. It could be helping restock your grocery store or farmers market with quality produce.

  • A Texan moved to England and shared 3 things nobody warned her about. The one about cereal is painfully relatable.
    Photo credit: CanvaA young woman shops for groceries.
    ,

    A Texan moved to England and shared 3 things nobody warned her about. The one about cereal is painfully relatable.

    Ashley Jackson traded South Texas sunshine for South Manchester drizzle. She has notes.

    Ashley Jackson (@themossycactus) spent twenty years in Texas before packing up and moving to South Manchester, England with her British husband and their two kids. The decision, she told Newsweek, came down to practical realities: affordable healthcare, family support, safer gun laws, and the kind of walkable community life that’s harder to find in Texas, where she said “you drive everywhere and these opportunities aren’t there.”

    She’s been documenting the adjustment on TikTok under the handle @themossycactus, and a February video laying out her “3 harsh truths” for Americans considering a similar move has struck a nerve.

    A Texan’s three warnings for Americans in England

    Truth number one: the weather. “It’s cold, it’s rainy, it’s hot… there is no AC, and sometimes it’s all in the same day,” Jackson said. Coming from Texas, where the sun is a reliable constant, the erratic grey of northern England takes getting used to. Interestingly, Jackson said she has actually come around on the weather personally, but she still complains about it, because complaining about the weather is practically a requirement of British social life.

    Truth number two: the humour. “You are never going to be as funny or sarcastic as they are,” she said. “You can strive, but they will probably always be one up.” British sarcasm is its own dialect, and Jackson said you just have to accept that you will never fully master it.

    @themossycactus

    What’s the best way to “blend” in with you guys? Let me know in the comments. ⬇️✨ #britishculture #uk #americanintheuk #texaninengland

    ♬ original sound – Ashley

    Truth number three: the cereal aisle. “You won’t have 99 choices of cereal, but your life will be better for it. You’ll get about a quarter of that.” The American supermarket experience complete with, wall-to-wall options and twelve varieties of the same thing doesn’t really exist in the same way in the UK, and Jackson said adjusting to less choice is actually a net positive once you stop expecting it.

    The habits she picked up to blend in

    To go with the harsh truths, Jackson shared three habits she’s adopted to blend in: eating a sausage sandwich once a week, using understatements as a communication style, and moaning about the weather even when she secretly doesn’t mind it.

    She’s not alone on this

    Jackson’s experience reflects a broader trend. A Harris Poll survey found that 52% of Americans believe they can achieve a higher quality of life abroad, with 49% citing lower cost of living, 48% citing dissatisfaction with the political climate, and 35% citing security concerns as reasons to leave.

    For Jackson, the surprises weren’t all hard ones. “In many ways, it was better than I expected,” she told Newsweek. “I wasn’t expecting the community support we have found.”

    She tried to prepare for everything. The sausage sandwich, nobody warned her about.

    You can follow Ashley Jackson (@themossycactus) on TikTok for more lifestyle content.

Explore More Stories

Well-being

Licensed therapist shares 6 signs you’re doing a lot better than you think you are

Ideas

Career expert shares polite but effective way to reclaim credit when someone steals your idea

Society

Are women board members risk averse or agents of innovation? It’s complicated, new research shows

Health

Reclaiming water from contaminated brine can increase water supply and reduce environmental harm