Scheue. It's a German word for the moment a horse is stung by a wasp. The strategist Christian Madsbjerg insightfully uses it to encapsulate something we have all felt: an "atmosphere of flailing attempts at action amid an indecipherable deluge of data points."
The world is in a state of scheue. As Coronavirus began its exponential spread, countries, cities, markets, sports leagues, and conferences either didn't act on the right data or froze in a state of inaction. Then the wasp stung. Heads of State, diplomats, star athletes, celebrities and politicians infected and quarantined. Conferences and concerts, entire countries shutting doors. Market volatility at Great Recession levels.
Here is the rub: the wasp wasn't flying too quickly for the world to see it before it stung. And further, we could have built a system to turn its sting into a manageable prick. But we didn't — and its indicative of a problem far larger than the coronavirus.
Right now, those in charge of the world's most important decisions are not behaving preventatively. They are behaving reactively.
Years ago, the emergency preparedness programs to roll out a sober, coordinated response to a pandemic could have been better funded and more carefully prepared. Abundant, patient capital for labs and startupsdeveloping breakthrough, reliable diagnostics technologies could have flowed. While those types of programs and investments take time, rarely dominate headlines and win elections, they create futures with less of the chaos and suffering we now experience. They are almost always less expensive. And most importantly, they don't require playing Roulette with human lives.
Coronavirus will not permanently cripple humanity. But it is our dress rehearsal for the future threats that can.
We know what many of these threats are. The electrical grid, providing the power we depend on for nearly everything,remains vulnerable to cyberattack, solar and physical threats. Preventing that problem is relativelycheap (we'reworking on it). Development of lethal autonomousweapons, the next nightmare in the future of war, continues to proliferate while preventative action to regulate the technologystalls. Between 1979 and 1989, a few brave scientists, against considerable odds, got excruciatingly closeto addressing climate change. Now we face down the barrel of perhaps the nastiest Frankenstein humanity has helped build.
This is the time to implement big, bold, but common-sense measures to prepare for future crises.
Make it legal for labs and universities to clear tests and drugs early in an outbreak. After State and Federal officials rejected pleas from labs like Stanford and the Mayo Clinic to develop early diagnostics for Coronavirus, those labs listened to the data, realized the threat and went ahead anyway -- an act of civil disobedience against the federal government. Bioinformatics expert and investor Balaji Srinivasan has it right: "right to try" laws need to be expanded to make this legal. Reputable labs must be free to develop and clear tests and drugs without bureaucratic limitations in times of crisis.
Reinstate and strengthen the office of Global Health Security and Biodefense. The White House used to have a dedicated directorate for Global Health Security and Biodefense inside the National Security Council. It was built specifically for times like these -- to manage a swift and effective response to a global pandemic. In 2018, the entire office was dissolved. It should be immediately reinstated and strengthened.
Strengthen the World Health Organization -- and listen to it. Fifteen years ago, the World Health Organization (WHO) updated the International Health Regulations, creating a single plan for the world to most effectively respond to future outbreaks. The plan designated the WHO to be the central global body that oversees the response. The problem is, this time the plan didn't work. Dozens of nations simply didn't follow the rules; at times not reporting outbreaks at all, refusing to share data and forcing ineffective and harmful travel restrictions against constant guidance. Plans like this will continue to fail unless international bodies like the WHO are greatly strengthened. Data access and curation is the key here. The WHO, not individual countries, needs to be equipped with robust and resilient digital global infrastructure (cloud computing, data lakes and analytics) directly supported and funded by the G-8 nations as a price for admission to that exclusive club. Willingness to share and curate data must be tied to the ability of any nation to engage in international trade – where the result for non-compliance is sweeping economic sanctions in the name of public safety.
Soon, we will return to our cocoons, pre-occupied by the next meme, the next election, the next Bachelor. When we do, note the subtle feeling that the wasp is buzzing towards us, still far enough away to do something about. And let's swat it away.
Henry Elkus is CEO of Helena, "an organization that identifies global problems, does diligence on potential solutions, and executes those solutions in the form of tangible projects."
Wiman hiding her face behind a bunch of cashCanva
A mansion and its reflection in the swimming poolCanva
Salzburg at nightCanva
Fancy homeCanva
Happy volunteersCanva
Parents of young children get more time with them if they work from home.Photo credit: Canva
Juicy subject matter
Giphy from The Blacklist.
We could start a rumor.
Grieving couple comforting each other
This response to someone grieving a friend might be the best internet comment ever
When someone is hit with the sudden loss of a friend or loved one, words rarely feel like enough. Yet, more than a decade ago, a wise Redditor named GSnow shared thoughts so profound they still bring comfort to grieving hearts today.
Originally posted around 2011, the now-famous reply was rediscovered when Upvoted, an official Reddit publication, featured it again to remind everyone of its enduring truth. It began as a simple plea for help: “My friend just died. I don't know what to do.”
What followed was a piece of writing that many consider one of the internet’s best comments of all time. It remains shared across social media, grief forums, and personal messages to this day because its honesty and metaphor speak to the raw reality of loss and the slow, irregular path toward healing.
Below is GSnow’s full reply, unchanged, in all its gentle, wave-crashing beauty:
Why this advice still matters
Mental health professionals and grief counselors often describe bereavement in stages or phases, but GSnow’s “wave theory” gives an image more relatable for many. Rather than a linear process, grief surges and retreats—sometimes triggered by a song, a place, or a simple morning cup of coffee.
In recent years, this metaphor has found renewed relevance. Communities on Reddit, TikTok, and grief support groups frequently reshare it to help explain the unpredictable nature of mourning.
Many readers say this analogy helps them feel less alone, giving them permission to ride each wave of grief rather than fight it.
Finding comfort in shared wisdom
Since this comment first surfaced, countless people have posted their own stories underneath it, thanking GSnow and passing the words to others facing fresh heartbreak. It’s proof that sometimes, the internet can feel like a global support group—strangers linked by shared loss and hope.
For those searching for more support today, organizations like The Dougy Center, GriefShare, and local bereavement groups offer compassionate resources. If you or someone you know is struggling with intense grief, please reach out to mental health professionals who can help navigate these deep waters.
When grief comes crashing like the ocean, remember these words—and hang on. There is life between the waves.
This article originally appeared four years ago.