A Visual Assessment of Damage at Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant

Look at these satellite images of the Fukushima nuclear reactors before and after the earthquake, tsunami, and explosions.

Every day since the massive earthquake off the coast of Japan, I wake up hoping to hear some kind of good new, hoping that things are at least starting to get better. But every day it just seems to get worse and worse.

This morning, we rise to find these headlines:

(Credit to National Geographic's Dennis Dimmick for highlighting these papers this morning, and for linking to the visual assessments below.)

First, a quick reminder that we're constantly updating our list of ways to help and support the rescue and relief efforts in Japan.

As for the current state of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant, it's hard to balance the more conservative comments from the Japanese government (who understandably don't want to cause panic) with the more sensational headlines coming from much western media.

While conflicting reports fly around, one of the only things you can be 100 percent certain of are photographs, videos, and other visual documentation. I found these aerial images (combined with the very helpful video from Reuters that we posted earlier) from Digital Globe (PDF) to really help my understanding of the situation there.

The images, from before the earthquake and then from March 13 and 14 show the sequence of destruction in the different reactor buildings. Digital Globe has a whole packet available as a PDF that is well worth examining.

Where exactly do things stand now? A third blast that occurred overnight (in America) and officials warned that radiation had reached "harmful levels." Reuters then reported that this "nuclear crisis is equivalent to number six on the INES scale of nuclear accidents from one to seven." Chernobyl was a seven, and Three Mile Island was a five. The government later said that radiation levels had fallen.

Image: Digital Globe

via Barry Schapiro / Twitter

The phrase "stay in your lane" is usually lobbed at celebrities who talk about politics on Twitter by people who disagree with them. People in the sports world will often get a "stick to sports" when they try to have an opinion that lies outside of the field of play.

Keep Reading

The Free the Nipple movement is trying to remove the stigma on women's breasts by making it culturally acceptable and legal for women to go topless in public. But it turns out, Free the Nipple might be fighting on the wrong front and should be focusing on freeing the nipple in a place you'd never expect. Your own home.

A woman in Utah is facing criminal charges for not wearing a shirt in her house, with prosecutors arguing that women's chests are culturally considered lewd.

Keep Reading

In August, the Recording Academy hired their first female CEO, Deborah Dugan. Ten days before the Grammys, Dugan was placed on administrative leave for misconduct allegations after a female employee said Dugan was "abusive" and created a "toxic and intolerable" work environment. However, Dugan says she was actually removed from her position for complaining to human resources about sexual harassment, pay disparities, and conflicts of interest in the award show's nomination process.

Just five days before the Grammys, Dugan filed a complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and her claims are many. Dugan says she was paid less than former CEO Neil Portnow. In 2018, Portnow received criticism for saying women need to "step up" when only two female acts won Grammys. Portnow decided to not renew his contract shortly after. Dugan says she was also asked to hire Portnow as a consultant for $750,000 a year, which she refused to do.

Keep Reading