Carbon-Footprint Calculator Helps Lazy Americans Fight Climate Change

More Americans have been giving themselves a break on taking actions to limit climate change. That needs to stop.

Last time you needed to run out to the store or decided to pop over to a friend’s house, did you bike or walk? Or did you think, “It’s awfully hot/cold/rainy/humid out today. There’s that hill. I’m kind of tired. My feet hurt. Maybe I’ll just drive this time.”

If it was the latter, you’re not alone. Two climate-change communications research centers, one at Yale, the other at George Mason University, found that more Americans have been giving themselves a break on taking actions that would limit climate change. We’re less likely in the winter to turn the thermostat down to 68 degrees or cooler. We’re less likely to carpool. We’re less likely to bike or walk instead of driving.

These drops have been particularly pronounced in the last year. In 2010, most Americans (56 percent) reported that they often or always turned down the heat. Now less than half of us do—just 45 percent. But we began slipping even before this year: In 2008, more than three-fifths of Americans (62 percent) were keeping their thermostats low. And not only are we going easy on ourselves, we’re telling ourselves that it doesn’t matter. That our actions won’t change anything. We’re pessimistic about the impact of choices that other Americans and other people in industrialized countries are making, too.

But that’s not right. Individual households in the United States are responsible for a huge chunk of the country’s carbon emissions. The latest data available from the Environmental Protection Agency shows that when electricity use was factored in, the residential sector accounted for about 17.5 percent of the country’s 2009 greenhouse gas emissions. In comparison, the industrial sector accounted for 28.8 percent—more, but not that much more. Plus, the EPA numbers for the residential sector just cover electricity used for lighting, heating, cooling, and powering appliances and gas used for heating or cooking. Estimates for the percentage of emissions associated with all household consumption are as high as 80 percent of the country’s total.

Just by making different consumption choices, we can reduce our emissions by as much as 20 percent in one household. We know what these choices are: Weatherize your house or apartment. Choose energy-efficient appliances. Drive a more fuel-efficient vehicle. Carpool, or don’t drive at all.

The same exact carbon-saving advice doesn’t apply to everyone. As Christopher Jones and Daniel Kammen of University of California, Berkeley, showed in a study published this past March, people living in different places, in different family circumstances, create carbon in different ways. A two person, higher-income family in San Francisco does the most damage by driving and by jetting off on vacation or for business meetings. A four person, lower income family in St. Louis is burdened with electricity fueled by dirty energy sources, hot summers, cold winters, and more people to feed. This family could also save energy by driving a more fuel-efficient car, but they could also east less meat or turn off their appliances.

Data from the UC-Berkeley study went into making this carbon footprint calculator, which tailors carbon-saving advice to you, taking into account where you live, how much money you earn, and your consumer behaviors. It tells me that I could save the most tons of carbon by buying more of my electricity from green sources. That’s easy enough to do.

Photo courtesy of flickr user Auntie P.


For more than 20 years. Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME) has served the citizens of Maine in the U.S. Senate. For most of that time, she has enjoyed a hard-fought reputation as a moderate Republican who methodically builds bridges and consensus in an era of political polarization. To millions of political observers, she exemplified the best of post-partisan leadership, finding a "third way" through the static of ideological tribalism.

However, all of that has changed since the election of Donald Trump in 2016. Voters in Maine, particularly those who lean left, have run out of patience with Collins and her seeming refusal to stand up to Trump. That frustration peaked with the nomination of Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court.

Keep Reading Show less
NHM Vienna/Hans Reschreiter

Wealth inequality has been a hot topic of discussion as of late, but it's something that's occurred all throughout history. Class structure is a complicated issue, especially when you consider that haves and have nots have been in existence for over 4,000 years.

A study published in Science took a look at over 100 late Neolithic and early Bronze Age skeletons found in a burial site in southern Germany. The study "shed light on the complexity of social status, inheritance rules, and mobility during the Bronze Age." Partly by looking at their teeth and the artifacts they were buried with, researchers were able to discover that wealth inequality existed almost 4,000 years ago. "Our results reveal that individual households lasting several generations consisted of a high-status core family and unrelated low-status individuals, a social organization accompanied by patrilocality and female exogamy, and the stability of this system over 700 years," the study said.

Keep Reading Show less
via / Flickr and Dimitri Rodriguez / Flickr

Bernie Sanders' presidential campaign looks to be getting a huge big shot in the arm after it's faced some difficulties over the past few weeks.

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, a leading voice in the Democratic parties progressive, Democratic Socialist wing, is expected to endorse Sanders' campaign at the "Bernie's Back" rally in Queens, New York this Saturday.

Fellow member of "the Squad," Ilhan Omar, endorsed him on Wednesday.

Keep Reading Show less

When former Pittsburgh Steelers' center Mike Webster committed suicide in 2002, his death began to raise awareness of the brain damage experienced by NFL football players. A 2017 study found that 99% of deceased NFL players had a degenerative brain disease known as CTE (chronic traumatic encephalopathy). Only one out of 111 former football players had no sign of CTE. It turns out, some of the risks of traumatic brain injury experienced by heavily padded adults playing at a professional level also exist for kids with developing brains playing at a recreational level. The dangers might not be as intense as what the adults go through, but it can have some major life-long consequences.

A new PSA put out by the Concussion Legacy Foundation raises awareness of the dangers of tackle football on developing brains, comparing it to smoking. "Tackle football is like smoking. The younger I start, the longer I am exposed to danger. You wouldn't let me smoke. When should I start tackling?" a child's voice can be heard saying in the PSA as a mother lights up a cigarette for her young son.

Keep Reading Show less
via ICE / Flickr

The Connors family, two coupes from the United Kingdom, one with a three-month old baby and the other with twin two-year-olds, were on vacation in Canada when the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) turned their holiday into a 12-plus day-long nightmare.

On October 3, the family was driving near the U.S.-Canada border in British Columbia when an animal veered into the road, forcing them to make an unexpected detour.

The family accidentally crossed into the United States where they were detained by ICE officials in what would become "the scariest experience of our lives," according to a complaint filed with the inspector general of the Department of Homeland Security.

Keep Reading Show less