The Latest Shot Heard Around the World Comes From a 3-D Printed Gun

What if anyone could print a gun at home, using a 3-D printer and a standard nail? Last week, a law student in Austin, Texas made headlines when he proved that his design for a 3-D-printed gun could successfully fire. He wasn't the first to share templates for a 3-D-printed gun online, but in the past, experts have argued that a fully-printed gun would shatter in action. Though this one didn't work with a rifle cartridge, it survived a test with a .380 caliber bullet. In theory, it just got a whole lot easier to have an illegal weapon. A plastic weapon, no less, that would be more likely to make it past something like airport security.


Websites that share 3-D printing blueprints can refuse to post guns or gun parts, but just like music files or Game of Thrones episodes, once something is out there, it's not really possible to banish it from the internet. And 3-D printers themselves aren't going anywhere. People will still want to use 3D printers for good—say, printing out spare parts to repair a broken toy instead of throwing it away, or designing custom products for themselves. This seems like a very tricky thing to regulate. Even if someone needed a license to operate a 3-D printer, they'd still be easy to access.

There aren't easy answers here. In the United States, we have seen time and again how easy it is for unscrupulous people to get their hands on guns, but what will this mean in other parts of the world? And while this particular gun may be more of a prototype than a real weapon, what will happen as the tech continues to develop?

via Barry Schapiro / Twitter

The phrase "stay in your lane" is usually lobbed at celebrities who talk about politics on Twitter by people who disagree with them. People in the sports world will often get a "stick to sports" when they try to have an opinion that lies outside of the field of play.

Keep Reading

The Free the Nipple movement is trying to remove the stigma on women's breasts by making it culturally acceptable and legal for women to go topless in public. But it turns out, Free the Nipple might be fighting on the wrong front and should be focusing on freeing the nipple in a place you'd never expect. Your own home.

A woman in Utah is facing criminal charges for not wearing a shirt in her house, with prosecutors arguing that women's chests are culturally considered lewd.

Keep Reading

In August, the Recording Academy hired their first female CEO, Deborah Dugan. Ten days before the Grammys, Dugan was placed on administrative leave for misconduct allegations after a female employee said Dugan was "abusive" and created a "toxic and intolerable" work environment. However, Dugan says she was actually removed from her position for complaining to human resources about sexual harassment, pay disparities, and conflicts of interest in the award show's nomination process.

Just five days before the Grammys, Dugan filed a complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and her claims are many. Dugan says she was paid less than former CEO Neil Portnow. In 2018, Portnow received criticism for saying women need to "step up" when only two female acts won Grammys. Portnow decided to not renew his contract shortly after. Dugan says she was also asked to hire Portnow as a consultant for $750,000 a year, which she refused to do.

Keep Reading