Jamie Oliver Still Isn't Offering Real Solutions, But Maybe That's Fine From Jamie Oliver's Food Revolution to Beyoncé, Battling Childhood Obesity

The new season of Jamie Oliver's Food Revolution probably won't offer any practical solutions to childhood obesity. But maybe it only needs to be fun.


Tonight, the new season of Jamie Oliver's Food Revolution premiers on ABC.

The show follows a familiar plot line: it's Jamie vs. the evil overseers of school lunches. It can be fun, but as I've written before, the show doesn't offer practical solution to childhood obesity.

As Margo Wootan, a nutritionist at the Center for Science in the Public Interest, said at a last month at MIT's Knight Science Journalism Food Boot Camp, "I’m a fan of Jamie Oliver, but I don’t believe it’s realistic. Not on $2.72"—the Federal reimbursement rate for free lunches. "I’m not a proponent of scratch cooking. What's important is the food is attractive and tastes good."

And Oliver's food hasn't met that requirement. A study (PDF) of his "food revolution" in Huntington, West Virginia, found that his new school menus, while marginally healthier, "were not well-accepted and had a negative impact on meal participation and milk consumption."

Furthermore, Jane Black, an author who's been documenting West Virginia in the wake of Oliver's first season, argues that tackling childhood obesity shouldn't focus on schools alone. She writes:

The reasons school-food reform became a rallying point have more to do with political strategy than with the likelihood that school meals will fundamentally change children’s eating habits or help them lose weight. Simply put, it’s just easier to attack the way the government feeds kids than the way their parents do.


The evidence is stacking up against Oliver. But maybe we shouldn't expect him do anything more than bring an awareness of nutritional issues to a broader audience. After all, this fun video from Beyoncé and Michelle Obama's Let's Move campaign doesn't even pretend to be informative. It's just about getting people interested. Maybe that's enough.


via Barry Schapiro / Twitter

The phrase "stay in your lane" is usually lobbed at celebrities who talk about politics on Twitter by people who disagree with them. People in the sports world will often get a "stick to sports" when they try to have an opinion that lies outside of the field of play.

Keep Reading

The Free the Nipple movement is trying to remove the stigma on women's breasts by making it culturally acceptable and legal for women to go topless in public. But it turns out, Free the Nipple might be fighting on the wrong front and should be focusing on freeing the nipple in a place you'd never expect. Your own home.

A woman in Utah is facing criminal charges for not wearing a shirt in her house, with prosecutors arguing that women's chests are culturally considered lewd.

Keep Reading

In August, the Recording Academy hired their first female CEO, Deborah Dugan. Ten days before the Grammys, Dugan was placed on administrative leave for misconduct allegations after a female employee said Dugan was "abusive" and created a "toxic and intolerable" work environment. However, Dugan says she was actually removed from her position for complaining to human resources about sexual harassment, pay disparities, and conflicts of interest in the award show's nomination process.

Just five days before the Grammys, Dugan filed a complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and her claims are many. Dugan says she was paid less than former CEO Neil Portnow. In 2018, Portnow received criticism for saying women need to "step up" when only two female acts won Grammys. Portnow decided to not renew his contract shortly after. Dugan says she was also asked to hire Portnow as a consultant for $750,000 a year, which she refused to do.

Keep Reading