GOOD

Friend or Foe? Dissecting Facebook’s Fakers

Impostors are cluttering our friends lists. But are all faux profiles nefarious?

Out of more than 1.3 billion Facebook profiles, 170 million are fake—and you’re probably friends with several of them. An extremely unscientific sampling of my own Facebook friends reveals that at least 22 maintain bogus profiles. (Though in my admittedly biased opinion, their hoax accounts were set up with only the best of intentions.)


Several of the fakers on my friends list use their extra accounts to post status updates in the voice of a new baby or beloved pet. A few use Facebook profiles to market their small businesses in a “creative” way. Another established a profile to honor a miscarried baby. Only a few friends crossed the line into slightly nefarious territory—there’s the female acquaintance who established a fake profile to keep tabs on her children’s father, and the one who signs on as a non-existent guy to comment on her real page (and make her real-life crush jealous).

Anyone with more than one account is technically breaking Facebook law: Only one account is allowed per user. That means another of my friends—a teacher who maintains a public, work-friendly profile as well as her private personal one—is a Facebook criminal. Nevertheless, according to Facebook’s 2014 annual report, 4.3 to 7.9 percent of accounts are duplicates. Misclassified profiles—created on behalf of businesses, pets, or organizations—account for .8 to 2.1 percent of Facebook usage. And .4 to 1.2 percent of accounts are “undesirable”: they belong to hackers, spammers, and software-generated fake profiles from companies like BoostLikes.com or SocialFormulae.com.

The damage caused by these impostors should be taken seriously. Earlier this year, global-security expert Mark Goodman noted in his book Future Crimes: Everything is Connected, Everyone is Vulnerable and What We Can Do About It that 160,000 Facebook pages are hacked into every day. Hackers can get into your profile, falsify your personal information, then move on to do any number of creepy things, including:

  • Mining for cell phone numbers of the affected profile and friends
  • Monitoring status updates to track when someone is away from home
  • Stalking someone
  • Spamming the entire friends list with virus-laden links
  • Creating other Facebook profiles modeled after friends to hack into more accounts
  • Collecting information for identity theft

Luckily, with a bit of light research, it can be pretty easy to tell the difference between a real and fake Facebook profile. Here are the things you need to know whenever you get a random friend request or one from someone you’ve already friended:

Check for status updates (or the lack thereof).

Forty-three percent of fake accounts will never update their status, as opposed to 15 percent of real Facebookers. Nevertheless, fake profiles tend to have an enormous amount of friends—about six times more than the average user.

Pay attention to excessive photo tagging.

Fake profiles tag many more people in photos than real people—about 136 tags for every four photos instead of just one (which is the average for real users). Fake profile photos also tend to be more glamorous—they’re often drawn from stock photography, as opposed to authentic shots with friends or family.

Watch out for strangers who are unusually excited about being female, bisexual, or a college graduate.

Sixty percent of fake profiles identify as bisexual, and 97 percent are women—or so they say. Sixty-eight percent claim to have graduated from college. Location is a factor as well—fake accounts tend to indicate that they’re from countries where Facebook hasn’t yet caught on, such as Indonesia or Turkey. BBC News tested this idea when reporter Rory Cellan-Jones created a fake business page for a bogus company he created, Virtual Bagels. Within 24 hours, he had gained 1,600 likes—mostly from users just as fake as his company. Nearly all of the profiles listed locations in areas where Facebook is censored, like Egypt.

Take a second look at likes and interests.

Despite BBC News’ findings, users rarely “like” business or entertainment-related pages. And if you think you have an awful lot in common with a total stranger, it might not be a coincidence. If someone’s really trying to hack into your profile, they’ll often mirror your likes and interests in the hopes of starting a conversation.

But what if you find out you’ve already befriended an unfriendly faker? It may be difficult to undo damage already done, but you can take a few steps to make sure nothing else goes wrong. First and foremost, defriend the bogus profile, block it, and report it as spam to the site, so Facebook can disable the page. Tell your friends and family about the faker, so they’ll have their guards up. In your settings, you can block requests from people with whom you have no mutual friends. It’s a good idea to keep your friends from appearing on your profile, so potential hackers won’t have access to anyone on your list.

According to Facebook’s Community Standards guidelines, the company disables any fake profile it finds and wipes all of its information from public view, yet doesn’t completely delete the account. The profile sits in a server, technically active but not really, effectively preventing the username from being taken by anyone ever again. (This can be a real problem for the victims of a hacked account, since they’ll lose access to all of their photos, status updates, and information. Facebook doesn’t send a copy of the data in this situation, and victims must formally request permission from the company to open a new account.)

Despite all this, my faker friends have no plans to give up their hoaxes anytime soon. They say they know they’re breaking the rules, and that they could lose their fake profiles at any moment. Still, they don’t seem to have any qualms about what they’re up to. Though it’s in Facebook’s best interest to minimize the presence of spammers and hackers, the company isn’t acting entirely out of goodwill here. Mark Zuckerberg has long been public on his stance that there shouldn’t be a distinction between our personal and private lives—but the more you share with more people, the more Facebook can monetize the information you put out there.

One profile, one you: To some, that might sound zen; to others, it’s even creepier than a cat who likes your status update.

Illustration by Brian Hurst

Articles
via Honor Africans / Twitter

The problem with American Sign Language (ASL) is that over 500,000 people in the U.S. use it, but the country has over 330 million people.

So for those with hearing loss, the chances of coming into contact with someone who uses the language are rare. Especially outside of the deaf community.

Keep Reading Show less

Looking back, the year 1995 seems like such an innocent time. America was in the midst of its longest streak of peace and prosperity. September 11, 2001 was six years away, and the internet didn't seem like much more than a passing fad.

Twenty-four years ago, 18 million U.S. homes had modem-equipped computers, 7 million more than the year before. Most logged in through America Online where they got their email or communicated with random strangers in chat rooms.

According to a Pew Research study that year, only 32% of those who go online say they would miss it "a lot" if no longer available.

Imagine what those poll numbers would look like if the question was asked today.

RELATED: Bill and Melinda Gates had a surprising answer when asked about a 70 percent tax on the wealthiest Americans

"Few see online activities as essential to them, and no single online feature, with the exception of E-Mail, is used with any regularity," the Pew article said. "Consumers have yet to begin purchasing goods and services online, and there is little indication that online news features are changing traditional news consumption patterns."

"Late Night" host David Letterman had Microsoft founder and, at that time the richest man in the world, on his show for an interview in '95 to discuss the "the big new thing."

During the interview Letterman chided Gates about the usefulness of the new technology, comparing it to radio and tape recorders.

Gates seems excited by the internet because it will soon allow people to listen to a baseball game on their computer. To which Letterman smugly replies, "Does radio ring a bell?" to laughter from the crowd.

But Gates presses Letterman saying that the new technology allows you to listen to the game "whenever you want," to which Letterman responds, "Do tape recorders ring a bell?"

Gates then tells Letterman he can keep up with the latest in his favorite hobbies such as cigar smoking or race cars through the internet. Letterman shuts him down saying that he reads about his interests in magazines.

RELATED: Bill Gates has five books he thinks you should read this summer.

The discussion ends with the two laughing over meeting like-minded people in "troubled loner chat room on the internet."

The clip brings to mind a 1994 segment on "The Today Show" where host Bryant Gumbel and Katie Couric have a similar discussion.

"What is internet anyway?" an exasperated Gumball asks. "What do you write to it like mail?"

"It's a computer billboard but it's nationwide and it's several universities all joined together and it's getting bigger and bigger all the time," a producer explains from off-stage.





Culture
Photo by Li-An Lim on Unsplash

The future generations will have to live on this Earth for years to come, and, not surprisingly, they're very concerned about the fate of our planet. We've seen a rise in youth activists, such as Greta Thunberg, who are raising awareness for climate change. A recent survey indicates that those efforts are working, as more and more Americans (especially young Americans) feel concerned about climate change.

A new CBS News poll found that 70% of Americans between 18 and 29 feel climate change is a crisis or a serious problem, while 58% of Americans over the age of 65 share those beliefs. Additionally, younger generations are more likely to feel like it's their personal responsibility to address climate change, as well as think that transitioning to 100% renewable energy is viable. Overall, 25% of Americans feel that climate change is a "crisis," and 35% feel it is a "serious problem." 10% of Americans said they think climate change is a minor problem, and 16% of Americans feel it is not a problem that worries them.

The poll found that concern for the environment isn't a partisan issue – or at least when it comes to younger generations. Two-thirds of Republicans under the age of 45 feel that addressing climate change is their duty, sentiments shared by only 38% of Republicans over the age of 45.

Keep Reading Show less
The Planet