Follow Florida's Lead: Why More States Should Switch to Digital Textbooks in Schools Now

All of Florida's public schools will switch to digital textbooks by 2015. Yes, it sounds expensive, but other states should be following suit.

It seems like digital textbooks have been the next big thing for years, but, with a few isolated exceptions, they haven't exactly been embraced by schools. That's about to change in Florida thanks to the gutsy passage of a law requiring all public schools in the state to make the switch to e-textbooks by the 2015-16 school year. Critics are a bit freaked out over this decision because education budgets are already tight and e-readers aren't free. But it's about time school districts make the move.

Admittedly, digital textbooks don't look like a great deal right now. On top of having to shell out a few hundred dollars for a Kindle, Nook, or iPad, you then have to pay for the digital textbooks themselves, and they're generally only about $10 cheaper than their hardback counterparts. That's because the bulk of publisher's production costs come from paying researchers and writers, not printing.

But that doesn't mean we shouldn't begin the transition. Florida districts have four years to figure this out, and the price of e-readers will drop even more during that time. After all, the devices are already half as expensive as they were just a couple of years ago. Even if the price of e-readers doesn't halve again, there are plenty of other ways districts will save megabucks by making the switch. And digital textbooks may get cheaper too if the format makes it easier for editions to be updated year after year.

Furthermore, e-readers wouldn't only be used for textbooks. Classic books, which are mainstays of middle and high school English classes, often have expired copyrights and are therefore part of the public domain. They can be downloaded for free. Instead of schools having to buy new class sets of The Great Gatsby and To Kill a Mockingbird year after year, each new group of students can simply download a copy without spending a dime.

Schools also spend significant money replacing damaged or lost textbooks, and paying the shipping costs to get those heavy boxes of books to the school site. E-readers take away those expenses completely since a dog can eat a hardback math book, but it can't chew up a digital one. But what if the family dog chews up the e-reader, or the student somehow loses or damages it? Schools will obviously need to teach kids how to take care of their technology—basics like not using your e-reader when you're eating or drinking—and will need to ensure that every child has a protective case. But those are lessons kids are learning, or at the very least should learn, anyway. Many have grown up with laptops and smartphones.

To cover for cases when a costly piece of equipment is damaged, parents will probably need to pay some sort of minimal insurance fee. At Clearwater High School in Clearwater, Florida, which piloted an entirely digital book system this year, parents had to pay a $20 insurance fee.

Parents might not mind shelling out that $20 if it means they can save money by not having to send their kid to the doctor because of back pain. Student pain due to hauling around heavy textbooks is actually a serious issue for kids. One USA Today study found that New York second graders haul around an average of 5.3 pounds a day in their backpacks. I believe it. My own second grader constantly complains about the weight of his backpack.

By the time students get to sixth grade, the weight of the books and supplies they're dragging around increases to 18.4 pounds. At the middle and high school level, given that students don't always have a locker, or the time to get to it between passing periods, teens are carrying around that much weight all day long.

E-readers only look like a bad idea in the most short-sighted analysis. Florida students are lucky their state is making the switch. The rest of the country's schools should be following suit.

photo via

via Alan Levine / Flickr

The World Health Organization is hoping to drive down the cost of insulin by encouraging more generic drug makers to enter the market.

The organization hopes that by increasing competition for insulin, drug manufacturers will be forced to lower their prices.

Currently, only three companies dominate the world insulin market, Eli Lilly, Novo Nordisk and Sanofi. Over the past three decades they've worked to drastically increase the price of the drug, leading to an insulin availability crisis in some places.

In the United States, the price of insulin has increased from $35 a vial to $275 over the past two decades.

Keep Reading Show less

Oh, irony. You are having quite a day.

The Italian region of Veneto, which includes the city of Venice, is currently experiencing historic flooding. Venice Mayor Luigi Brugnaro has stated that the flooding is a direct result of climate change, with the tide measuring the highest level in 50 years. The city (which is actually a collection of 100 islands in a lagoon—hence its famous canal streets), is no stranger to regular flooding, but is currently on the brink of declaring a state of emergency as waters refuse to recede.

Keep Reading Show less
The Planet

Since the International Whaling Commission banned commercial whaling in 1986, whale populations have been steadily recovering. However, whales in the wild still face other dangers. In the summer of 2018, four Russian companies that supply aquariums with marine animals captured almost 100 beluga whales and killer whales (aka orcas). After a public outcry, those whales are swimming free as the last of the captive whales have been released, the first time this many captured whales have been released back into the wild.

In late 2018 and early 2019, a drone captured footage of 11 orcas and 87 beluga whales crammed into holding pens in the Srednyaya Bay. The so-called "whale jail" made headlines, and authorities began to investigate their potentially illegal capture.

Keep Reading Show less
The Planet
via Twitter / Bye,Bye Harley Davidson

The NRA likes to diminish the role that guns play in fatal shootings by saying, "Guns don't kill people, people kill people."

Which is the same logic as, "Hammers don't build roofs, people build roofs." No duh. But it'd be nearly impossible to build a roof without a hammer.

So, shouldn't the people who manufacture guns share some responsibility when they are used for the purpose they're made: killing people? Especially when the manufacturers market the weapon for that exact purpose?

Keep Reading Show less
via Gage Skidmore / Flickr

The 2020 election is a year away, but Donald Trump has some serious ground to cover if he doesn't want it to be a historical blowout.

A Washington Post- ABC News poll released Tuesday shows that Trump loses by double digits to the top Democratic contenders.

Vice President Joe Biden (56%-39%); Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts (54%-39%); Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont (56%-39%); South Bend, Indiana, Mayor Pete Buttigieg (52%-41%); and Sen. Kamala Harris of California (52%-41%) all have big leads over the president.

Keep Reading Show less