Last Thursday, Obama released memos from the Office of Legal Counsel that detailed the “enhanced interrogation techniques” used on some detainees by the CIA. Among them: waterboarding, forced nudity, slapping and “walling,” sleep deprivation, and other really unpleasant things that fall short of causing permanant organ damage. You can see the memos themselves here. It’s pretty embarrassing for America.At the time, Obama condemmed these techniques as torture, but said he would protect any government operatives who authorized them or used them from prosecution. But wait, how does that work? Obama’s part of the executive branch, not the judicial one-and he didn’t pardon the torturers. If they’re guilty of a crime, they’re guilty of a crime, right?Phil Zelikow made this point in a post at Foreign Policy yesterday:“So has anyone beside me found it troubling that President Obama is making announcements on who should be prosecuted for possible crimes? Whatever one’s view of the matter, didn’t the administration ardently announce its dedication to depoliticizing the Department of Justice? So why is it proper for the president to tell Attorney General Eric Holder what he should conclude?”And now Obama has said that it is, in fact, Eric Holder’s call whether to prosecute torturers. From the Boston Globe:“President Obama today opened the door, at least a crack, to prosecuting Bush administration officials who drafted memos that authorized what critics call torture against terrorism suspects. ‘It’s more of a decision for the attorney general,’ he said. ‘I don’t want to prejudge that.’”Prosecuting the legal contortionists who wrote memos that justified torture would make sense to me. Going after workaday CIA agents seems less important. But at the end of the day I’m not sure this kind of retroactive, retributive punishment should be among the Justice Department’s most pressing concerns. I’d suggest that Holder just “deprioritize” torture prosecutions the way Amerhert “deprioritized” marijuana law enforcement.What do you think?Khmer Rouge waterboarding equipment from Flickr user waterboardingdotorg, licensed under Creative Commons.
Tags
advertisement
More for You
-
14 images of badass women who destroyed stereotypes and inspired future generations
These trailblazers redefined what a woman could be.
Throughout history, women have stood up and fought to break down barriers imposed on them from stereotypes and societal expectations. The trailblazers in these photos made history and redefined what a woman could be. In doing so, they paved the way for future generations to stand up and continue to fight for equality.
-
Why mass shootings spawn conspiracy theories
Mass shootings and conspiracy theories have a long history.
While conspiracy theories are not limited to any topic, there is one type of event that seems particularly likely to spark them: mass shootings, typically defined as attacks in which a shooter kills at least four other people.
When one person kills many others in a single incident, particularly when it seems random, people naturally seek out answers for why the tragedy happened. After all, if a mass shooting is random, anyone can be a target.
Pointing to some nefarious plan by a powerful group – such as the government – can be more comforting than the idea that the attack was the result of a disturbed or mentally ill individual who obtained a firearm legally.
advertisement

