GOOD

Tackling Social Justice Issues Through a Storytelling Hackathon

Why do we know more about yet another "hand-crafted small-batch premium vodka made only with the freshest of water from pristine location X" and not much about the 80,000 people in solitary confinement right now in our prisons, or the arbitrary detention of 34,000 immigrants every day, or the myth of our representative democracy?


What if we could find a way to make these pressing issues not heavy but engaging enough to inform and effect change? What if we could bring together the frontline advocates who are struggling to make their voices heard with the most talented designers, filmmakers, writers, technologists and other creatives in their city?

We set out to create a new type of hackathon—one focused on bringing the best storytellers to work on social justice issues, but in a highly guided way. Unlike most of the almost-weekly hackathons, where sometimes the principle of unstructure can lead to ineffectiveness and frustration, we would curate the stories, create teams, and strip away all the points of inefficiency.

But would it work? Would top creatives be interested? Would they put in the pre-work? Would our guidance allow creativity to flourish or would participants chafe at having decisions taken for them?

Over the StoryHack weekend, multidisciplinary teams of five to seven collaborated with the activist who nominated each story. The energy and enthusiasm was palpable as they innovated new ways to think and communicate these stories through writing, visuals, performance, and code. In just about 36 hours, the StoryHackers created some pretty impressive results:

So how did it work?

High Standards

By putting the most talented people available to us in the room, we set the stage for excellence. Of 200 applicants, 100 creatives were chosen to participate, including people from reputable organizations like The New York Times, Google and the Wall Street Journal. Of 40 stories nominated for them to work by subject-matter experts, only eight were chosen and developed further. Selected stories focused on the perception of homelessness, immigration detention, solitary confinement, gun violence, representative democracy, economic justice, and more.

Balance

Creatives chose what stories they wanted to communicate. Evenly distributed teams of five to seven were assembled a week prior to the event, based on level of experience and skill sets. Both genders were equally represented in the creative pool, with slightly more women than men. Creatives originated from nine different countries and had an average of nearly 12 years of professional experience. Three out of four were participating in their first hackathon.

Clarity

We worked closely with story nominators to craft tight creative briefs outlining the specific issues, audience and supporting evidence needed to provide creative teams with a solid base to work from. We set up immersion sessions to get creatives out of their comfort zones and onto the frontlines of social justice. Our StoryHackers met fast-food organizers in Brooklyn, advocates for the homeless in the Bronx, a gun-violence mediator in Crown Heights, and visited a detention facility in New Jersey. On average, winning teams spent a collective 30 hours working on their project prior to the weekend of the StoryHack.

Collective Ownership

All subject-matter experts, creatives, and organizers selflessly volunteered their time for the collective good. The products generated are all open source and available for any organization to help inform their stakeholders about these issues.

We set out to re-act, re-think and re-solve the way we tell the stories that matter. The momentum and excitement generated over the Re3 StoryHack weekend was inspiring, to say the least. We're looking forward to bringing the StoryHack model back to NYC as well as new cities around the world!

Images courtesy of Hyperakt

Articles
via GOOD / YouTube

Last Friday, millions of people in 150 countries across the globe took to the streets to urge world leaders to enact dramatic solutions to combat climate change.

The Climate Strike was inspired, in part, by Greta Thunberg, a 16-year-old girl from Sweden who has captured worldwide attention for her tireless work to hold lawmakers responsible for the climate crisis.

The strike gave people across the planet the opportunity to make their voices heard before the U.N. General Assembly Climate Summit in New York City on Monday.

Keep Reading Show less
The Planet
Julian Meehan

Young leaders from around the world are gathering at the United Nations Headquarters in New York Saturday to address arguably the most urgent issue of our time. The Youth Climate Summit comes on the heels of an international strike spearheaded by Greta Thunberg, the 16-year-old climate activist from Sweden, who arrived in New York via emissions-free sailboat earlier this month.

Translated from Swedish, "berg" means "mountain," so it may feel fated that a young woman with Viking blood in her veins and summit in her name would be at the helm. But let's go out on a limb and presume Thunberg, in keeping with most activists, would chafe at the notion of pre-ordained "destiny," and rightly so. Destiny is passive — it happens to you. It's also egomaniacal. Change, on the other hand, is active; you have to fight. And it is humble. "We need to get angry and understand what is at stake," Thunberg declared. "And then we need to transform that anger into action."

This new generation of activists' most pernicious enemy is denial. The people in charge — complacent politicians and corporation heads who grossly benefit from maintaining the status quo — are buffered from real-life consequences of climate change. But millions of people don't share that privilege. For them, climate change isn't an abstract concept, but a daily state of emergency, whether it comes in the form of "prolonged drought in sub-Saharan Africa…devastating tropical storms sweeping across Southeast Asia, the Caribbean and the Pacific…[or] heatwaves and wildfires," as Amnesty International reportsare all too real problems people are facing on a regular basis.

RELATED: Greta Thunberg urges people to turn to nature to combat climate change

Keep Reading Show less
The Planet
Climate Action Tracker

In 2016, 196 countries signed the Paris Agreement, pledging to combat climate change by taking action to curb the increase in global temperatures. The Paris Agreement requires countries to report on their emissions and what steps they're taking to implement those plans. Now that the countries are coming together again for the U.N. Climate Action Summit in New York City, it's worth taking a look at what kind of progress they've made.

The Climate Action Trackerkeeps tabs on what each country is doing to limit warming, and if they're meeting their self-set goals. Countries are graded based on whether or not their actions would help limit warming to 1.5 degrees C.

According to a recent article from National Geographic, The Gambia, Morocco, and India are at the head of the class. "Even though carbon emissions in The Gambia, Morocco, and India are expected to rise, they'll fall short of exceeding the 1.5-degree Celsius limit," the article reads. Saudi Arabia, Russia and the United States, on the other hand, get a big fat F. "Projected emissions in Saudi Arabia, Russia, and the United States are far greater than what it would take to limit warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius."

Keep Reading Show less
The Planet

September 20th marks the beginning of a pivotal push for the future of our planet. The Global Climate Strike will set the stage for the United Nations Climate Action Summit, where more than 60 nations are expected to build upon their commitment to 2015's Paris Agreement for combating climate change.

Millions of people are expected to take part in an estimated 4,000 events across 130 countries.

Keep Reading Show less
The Planet
Ottawa Humane Society / Flickr

The Trump Administration won't be remembered for being kind to animals.

In 2018, it launched a new effort to reinstate cruel hunting practices in Alaska that had been outlawed under Obama. Hunters will be able to shoot hibernating bear cubs, murder wolf and coyote cubs while in their dens, and use dogs to hunt black bears.

Efforts to end animal cruelty by the USDA have been curtailed as well. In 2016, under the Obama Administration, the USDA issued 4,944 animal welfare citations, in two years the numbers dropped to just 1,716.

Keep Reading Show less
Science