People don’t have children for lots of reasons, whether it’s financial, medical, environmental, or even just (gasp!) not being all that good with kids. But a lot of folks can’t comprehend being childless, and sometimes they respond with mockery instead of curiosity or compassion.
One Millennial shared such an insult they read online, and the responses ranged from encouragement to one-liners to the digital equivalent of a middle finger.
"To my fellow childless millennials in their late 30s and early 40s, we're apparently 'losers' now because we don't have kids," someone wrote in a thread on the /Millennial subreddit. "Lol. That's according to someone on here who said this earlier today but has since deleted their post. I thought I'd let you know we're now losers, according to them." (While the OP's initial prompt has since been removed, the thread itself still stands.)
- YouTubewww.youtube.com
The top response focused on being able to brush aside criticism in middle age and beyond. "Do you know what the best part of getting older is?" one Redditor wrote. "Not giving a shit about what anyone thinks, ESPECIALLY anyone on Reddit lol." Someone replied that reaching decade four changed their perspective: "Absolutely the best thing that happened to me or any of my friends was turning 40. 39 and 364 days old? Anxious about some stuff. 40, woke up and had the old person mind—I’ll do what I want and anyone who doesn’t like it can totally piss off."
Some words of wisdom also arrived from a parent of four kids, who "wouldn’t have it any other way" but also realizes why someone would take a different path. "[I]t is incredibly hard, and I sometimes feel like I'm sacrificing everything so that they can have what I never had," they wrote. "I’m at peace with that, though. But some people are very bitter about it. Enjoy your freedom. We all make our own life choices. Or sometimes we don't. But that's life also. Each has its merits."
Other parents responded with tongue-in-cheek jealously, highlighting the idea that not everyone feels 100 percent confident in their decision. "36M with 4 kids here," someone wrote. "Such losers you are, with your disposable income and freedom of time. Hahaha haha. Send help pls." (Also, about that extra money: "Wait, there's supposed to be disposable income without kids?" reads one reply. "Shit…I must have had shit rolls this campaign.")
Lots of other childless Millennials chimed in: several people who are content with being cat guardians, someone who can’t have children due to cancer treatment, another who feels satisfied with having "plenty of nieces and nephews."
- YouTubewww.youtube.com
In findings from a survey presented in July 2024, the Pew Research Center reported that the "share of U.S. adults younger than 50 without children who say they are unlikely to ever have kids rose 10 percentage points between 2018 and 2023 (from 37% to 47%)." Those in the below-50 group cited a variety of reasons for not wanting kids, including, "They don't really like children" (20%), "concerns about the environment, including climate change" (26%), "they can't afford to raise a child" (36%), "concerns about the state of the world, other than the environment" (38%), "they want to focus on other things, such as their career or interests" (44%), and, simply, "they just don't want to have children" (57%).
The money concern is notable, given the expense of starting a family. As CBS News reports, citing a LendingTree survey, the average cost of raising a child from birth to age 18 is $237,482. And whatever the reason, a lot more Americans appear to be abstaining from having kids: The pace recently hit a record low—down 2 percent from 2022 to 2023—according to birth certificate data analyzed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Problematic homework question
A student’s brilliant homework answer outsmarted her teacher's ridiculously sexist question
From an early age, children absorb societal norms—including gender stereotypes. But one sharp 8-year-old from Birmingham, England, challenged a sexist homework question designed to reinforce outdated ideas.
An English teacher created a word puzzle with clues containing “UR.” One prompt read “Hospital Lady,” expecting students to answer “nurse.”
While most did, Yasmine wrote “surgeon”—a perfectly valid answer. Her father, Robert Sutcliffe, shared the incident on X (formerly Twitter), revealing the teacher had scribbled “or nurse” beside Yasmine’s response, revealing the biased expectation.
For Yasmine, the answer was obvious: both her parents are surgeons. Her perspective proves how representation shapes ambition. If children only see women as nurses, they internalize limits. But when they witness diversity—like female surgeons—they envision broader possibilities.
As Rebecca Brand noted in The Guardian: “Their developing minds are that little bit more unquestioning about what they see and hear on their screens. What message are we giving those impressionable minds about women? And how might we be cutting the ambitions of little girls short before they've even had the chance to develop properly?”
X users praised Yasmine while critiquing the question. Such subtle conditioning reinforces stereotypes early. Research confirms this: a study found children as young as four associate jobs with gender, with girls choosing “feminine” roles (e.g., nursing) and boys opting for “masculine” ones (e.g., engineering).
Even preschoolers avoided careers misaligned with their gender, proving sexist conditioning begins startlingly young.
- YouTube www.youtube.com
The problem spans globally. Data from 50 countries reveals that by age 15, girls disproportionately abandon math and science, while boys avoid caregiving fields like teaching and nursing. This segregation perpetuates stereotypes—women are underrepresented in STEM, and men in caregiving roles—creating a cycle that limits both genders.
- YouTube www.youtube.com
This article originally appeared last year.