With another convention season wrapped, you may be suffering from a mild case of politics hangover. Or perhaps you're more engaged in the democratic process than ever. The conventions are costly—party officials say that each made-for-TV extravaganza had a price tag of nearly $120 million. Each side cut their gathering down to three days from the traditional four—Hurricane Isaac played a role in that scheduling decision for the RNC, but the DNC was planned for that length. Could two day conventions be next? Youth Radio has fielded teams of young reporters at the conventions since 1996. GOOD caught up with two from their team, Sayre Quevedo (19), who reported on the DNC from Charlotte and Robyn Gee (26), who produced and reported on the RNC from Tampa, to talk about the relative worth of these partisan stage shows.
GOOD: What did you find most valuable about the convention?
SAYRE QUEVEDO: The most valuable parts of the DNC for me were actually outside of the activities of the convention center or the stage at the arena. Walking around the city; talking to locals taking advantage of the convention buzz by working short-term jobs; interviewing delegates from different areas about their opinions on the youth vote and gun control—why it’s not being openly addressed—and watching the protests. Those were the moments where I felt I was getting genuine opinions that were distinct from prepared talking points, which I really appreciated.
GOOD: Did you find attendees and delegates discussing political issues in a substantive way or was it really just a big party?
ROBYN GEE: I saw both things happen at the Republican convention in Tampa. In the convention hall, I heard one repetitive message about jobs and the economy. People were determined to say that job creation was the only thing that mattered. I observed a board meeting of young Republicans in Florida, and one young woman said that social issues mattered to her, but she was only voting on fiscal issues in this election. The social issues seem to be what divides the Republican party, so it seemed like she preferred to stay away from them, and stick to the party’s narrative.
But I also spoke with a 20-year-old page at the RNC who told me how she thinks social and fiscal issues overlap. She had thought deeply about how her moral beliefs influenced her policy beliefs.
And my colleagues who went to Charlotte said they met delegates who were attending Occupy protests just to get a fuller picture of what people are buzzing about. These seemed like meaningful political conversations.
GOOD: How did local residents seem to regard the convention?
GEE: In Tampa, residents and business owners seemed split. We ate at one restaurant with a big cut-out statue of Mitt Romney wearing a t-shirt saying, “Bend over Tampa, the RNC is coming.”
But in another part of town, restaurant owners were coming out of their shops shouting, “Welcome Republicans! We’re open late!” In general, it seemed like residents were steering clear of downtown Tampa during the convention. Our whole visit, we were only stuck in traffic once.
One group of people very affected by the convention were those who sell street newspapers to make a living. We talked with one young mother selling newspapers on the side of the highway while her kids did their homework. She said that the city had kicked them out of downtown during the convention. They were staying in a motel at $120 per night, trying to make that rent on the side of the road.
QUEVEDO: Many of the locals I interviewed were temporary entrepreneurs selling puppets, pins, t-shirts, and towels, taking advantage of the large crowds and money being thrown around by visitors. I don’t know if they necessarily enjoyed the event being there or not, but they seemed like they were making the best of it. The others I spoke to seemed excited to have a big event like this happening in Charlotte, though I’m sure some were not happy with the closed routes and crowded streets.
GOOD: How is the value of the convention different for people who attend versus those who watch on TV?
GEE: Young people I talked to at the RNC who were participating in the political process for the first time were very enthusiastic. They were excited for the chance to see and hear their political celebrities in person.
There are also endless side events that happen in and around the convention that are not televised. We went to a panel for conservative women, youth vote panels, youth council meetings, Rock the Vote concerts, and even a lounge where people could talk politics while getting massages and facials.
GOOD: So why are these conventions worthy of such saturation media coverage?
QUEVEDO: I think if you’re interested in politics and want to learn more about a party’s platform, then this kind of media coverage is more effective than campaign ads, especially if you watch more than the headliners. But I think the value of the media at these events comes down to how people utilize the coverage. It’s probably most valuable if voters are following both conventions closely, understanding the platforms and hearing arguments from both parties, and then doing the research themselves.
Images courtesy of Youth Radio
















Representative Image: She helped deliver her baby brother. Photo credit: Canva
Representative Image: Every birth story is unique.Photo credit: Canva 
Gif of Emma Stone crying via
A woman comforts an older manCanva
A pair of feet being soaked in hot waterCanva
A smiling woman stretches at her desk at workCanva
Floating gardens with solar panels. Image from
Petroleum jelly. Image from 

You may have missed the actual meaning behind these 5 popular songs.
'Every breath you ...' what? 5 classic songs where people totally missed the meaning
I’ve never been a "lyrics guy"—as long as the words sound pleasing to the ear, are relatively interesting, and aren’t evil or distractingly dumb, I don’t care all that much what the singer is going on about. I’m focused on the dynamics, the color of the arrangements, the rhythms, and harmonies. It’s only natural that I’d misinterpret some songs over the years, including ones that I’ve heard a thousand times while walking around malls and supermarkets.
I know I’m not alone. And I’d argue there are plenty of factors behind this phenomenon: Some people take lyrics too literally, while others only focus on hooky choruses and fail to notice nuance in the verses. Context can also blind us—if the music is danceable and upbeat, you might fail to catch darker elements in the words. Still, it can be hilarious and/or shocking when hugely popular tunes are misinterpreted on a mass scale.
Speaking of which: Let’s consult a viral Reddit thread titled "Any songs that are (or were) misunderstood by the public?" There's a mountain of suggestions—everything from '90s Latin-pop hits to '80s heartland-rock epics. But five of them felt especially perfect, so let’s dig a little deeper below.
- YouTube www.youtube.com
The Police - "Every Breath You Take" (1983)
As someone argues in the comments, "Pointing out the real meaning behind 'Every Breath You Take' has to have become so commonplace that it can't really be misunderstood anymore." Point taken. But still…this eerie Police track continues to be used in pop culture and everyday life as a signifier of romance—appearing as the soundtrack to TV slow dances and being arranged for weddings by string quartets. It’s easy to assume, at first glance anyway, that the song's protagonist is pledging their devotion—sticking around for "every breath" their partner takes. Instead, the atmosphere is more disturbing, given the whole "I’ll be watching you" thing. "I didn't realize at the time [I wrote it] how sinister it is," Sting told The Independent in 1993. "I think I was thinking of Big Brother, surveillance, and control."
- YouTube www.youtube.com
Bruce Springsteen - "Born in the U.S.A." (1984)
"Born in the U.S.A." is one of Bruce Springsteen's signature songs—but also likely his most misinterpreted. As an official explainer video notes, the words "center around America's industrial decline and loss of innocence during the Vietnam War"—a message that became somewhat diluted as politicians began using the stadium-sized track for their campaigns. "Conservative commenters praised the song, and it earned the approval of both candidates in the 1984 presidential election," the clip's narrator adds. "Despite being adopted as a patriotic anthem, 'Born in the U.S.A.' is far from nationalistic." In a deep-dive piece, NPR quotes Springsteen talking about the song on stage: "'After it came out, I read all over the place that nobody knew what it was about,' he said before performing 'Born in the U.S.A' to a crowd in 1995. 'I'm sure that everybody here tonight understood it."
- YouTube www.youtube.com
Los Del Rio - "Macarena" (Bayside Boys remix) (1995)
Most Americans probably know the bubbly Bayside Boys remix of Los Del Rio's Spanish-language hit—it became the marquee moment of many a mid-'90s wedding reception and middle-school dance, thanks to its once-ubiquitous choreography. Maybe it's because people were too distracted by remembering the dance moves, but lots of us didn’t notice the lyrics. Of course, the chorus is in Spanish, which could have been a barrier for some, but the remix features English lines like the following: "Now don't you worry about my boyfriend / The boy whose name is Vitorino / Ha! I don't want him, can't stand him / He was no good so I, ha ha ha / Now come on, what was I supposed to do? / He was out of town, and his two friends were so fine."
"My little teenage mind was blown when I learned 'Macarena' was about cheating on a boyfriend with his friends," one Redditor wrote. "[Thank you] for the correction, it was 2 friends! Was sleep deprived writing this. I just did the moves, never questioned the lyrics." Yeah, gotta admit—this legitimately never crossed my mind either. Same with some of the people who took part in a reaction video for Distracify: "It’s definitely about dancing," one person said, before learning the truth. Another added, "I have no idea what it’s about still to this day. Please tell me it’s not something really dark."
- YouTube www.youtube.com
Baha Men - "Who Let the Dogs Out" (2000)
The party was nice. The party was pumpin'.' Until, that is, some "flea-infested mongrels" got involved. Back in 2000, you couldn't escape Baha Men's booming cover of "Who Let the Dogs Out"—it became a staple of sporting events everywhere, a kind of bookend for the Jock Jams era. "I know I definitely misunderstood 'Who Let the Dogs Out' to be about actual dogs," one Redditor wrote, likely speaking for most of the listening public. There's probably a good chance most of those people chanting the chorus weren't thinking about the song's real meaning, crafted by Trinidadian artist Anslem Douglas for his 1998 original. But if you pay attention to the lyrics, "Who Let the Dogs Out" has a feminist theme, telling the story of women who stand up against crass catcalling. "This is going to be a revenge song where a woman tells men, 'Get away from me—you're a dog,'" Douglas told Vice in a 2021 video history of the track. "[Offensive] slang was everywhere. It was just degrading women and calling them all sorts of derogatory names. I tried to do a social commentary as a party song, but the party song overshadowed the social commentary aspect of it."
- YouTube www.youtube.com
Hozier - "Take Me to Church" (2013)
One section of the Reddit thread is devoted to songs interpreted as pro-religion, when the truth is... well, more complicated. "'Take Me to Church' by Hozier is often used by Churches for things, and I’m like 'Oh, that’s not…,'" wrote one user. The bluesy, slow-burning ballad may use religious imagery. Still, it's about something more human—"[It's] this idea that powerful organizations use people’s sexuality in order to mobilize people against women, against gay people," the Irish songwriter told Genius in 2023. "And the justification behind that is often religious in nature." Hozier even isolated one particular lyric that highlights this misconception: "'She tells me, ‘Worship in the bedroom' [is] something tongue-and-cheek, a bit of humor to it, also revealing that this is not necessarily a traditional worship song," he said. "I think I still see my name put into playlists for Christian music, and I’m not averse to that—I don’t think the two are necessarily mutually exclusive. But that line I would’ve thought would’ve disqualified it from something like that."