Pretty much everyone knows what a sandwich is, right? And it’s amazing how they change from one place to another, but no matter where you are, biting into one is always a treat. Whether it’s an egg sandwich for breakfast, grilled cheese for snack time, India’s “Vada pav,” or Pennsylvania’s famous “hoagies,” sandwiches are loved all over. Ever stop to think about how the sandwich came to be, or how it got its name? Well, we’re here to break it all down for you.

Representative Image Source: Pexels | roman odintsov
Representative Image Source: Pexels | roman odintsov

According to Food Timeline, the first sandwich was made about 260 years ago by John Montagu, the fourth Earl of Sandwich. He invented this meal in 1762. As the story goes, he was once playing cards and did not want to leave the gaming table to eat supper. So, he asked the server something like “roast beef to be placed between two slices of bread,” so he could eat with one hand, leaving his other free for the game.

Image Source: Getty Images | Photo by bettmann - John Montagu, Fourth Earl of Sandwich (1718-1792)
Image Source: (Original Caption) John Montagu, Fourth Earl of Sandwich (1718-1792).

However, it’s believed that Montague didn’t come up with the idea of the sandwich; rather, he saw this dish being served in various forms during his travels in the Eastern Mediterranean. He noticed platters of grilled pita bread and small canapes served by Greeks and Turks during their mezes and he mimicked the meal idea for his convenience.

Representative Image Source: Pexels | karolina grabowska
Representative Image Source: Pexels | karolina grabowska

During the 1st century BC, a famous rabbi, Hillel the Elder, is also thought to have made the first sandwich. He mixed some slabs of Paschal lamb’s meat, bitter herbs, apples, nuts, and spices with some wine and put it between two soft matzohs. Popularly known as the “Hillel sandwich,” nowadays, it is eaten as a mixture of maror (bitter herbs) and charoset (traditional fruit-and-nut dish served on Passover), sandwiched between two pieces of matzah. 



But even before this, archaeologists have reported uncovering ovens containing carbonized loaves of bread called “panis quadratus,” in the ruins of Roman cities of Pompeii and Herculaneum, revealing evidence of sandwiches, before Mount Vesuvius blasted to ashes in 79 A.D. According to them, these were large round sourdough bread, toasted and sliced into eight pieces, with a hole in the center of the loaf, where they were stuffed with pieces of sliced cheese, bitter herbs and butter.

Representative Image Source: Pexels | rajesh tp
Representative Image Source: Pexels | rajesh tp

All these accounts merely demonstrate a sandwich-like dish but not the word “sandwich.” According to PBS, Edward Gibbon, the author of “The History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire,” was the first person to mention the word “sandwich.” In one of his journal entries dated November 24, 1762, he wrote, “Twenty or thirty, perhaps, of the first men in the kingdom, in point of fashion and fortune, supping at little tables covered with a napkin, in the middle of a coffee-room, upon a bit of cold meat, or a sandwich and drinking a glass of punch.”

Representative Image Source: Pexels | alex green
Representative Image Source: Pexels | alex green

Following this, there is another account of a minister eating a sandwich, although there is no mention of the word “sandwich.” This was in the early 1770s. The French travel writer Pierre-Jean Grosley published a satirical book titled “A Tour to London; Or New Observations on England and its Inhabitants.” In the book, Grosley described the scene of a gambling table, “A minister of state passed four and twenty hours at a public gaming table, so absorbed in play, that, during the whole time, he had no subsistence but a piece of beef, between two slices of toasted bread, which he eat without ever quitting the game. This new dish grew highly in vogue, during my residence in London; it was called by the name of the minister who invented it.”

Representative Image Source: Pexels | pixabay
Representative Image Source: Pexels | pixabay

In 1773, the word sandwich was used in a recipe for the first time, in Charlotte Mason’s cookbook, titled “The Lady’s assistant for regulating and supplying her table.” In America, sandwiches arrived mainly during the 19th century. People began to have them in their evening suppers, teas, picnics and excursions. In the “Encyclopedia of American Food and Drink,” John F. Mariani states that the sandwich was first introduced to America in 1840 by Eliza Leslie. In her “Directions for Cookery”, Leslie wrote a recipe consisting of ham sandwiches.

Representative Image Source: Pexels | lucas guizo
Representative Image Source: Pexels | lucas guizo

In the 1900s, during the Industrial Revolution, bakeries began to sell pre-sliced bread loaves. “Po’ boy sandwiches” were invented. A “Po’ boy sandwich” is a classic Louisiana staple recipe that comprises pieces of bread stuffed with crispy, golden, corn-meal, crusted shrimp, slathered in spicy Creole mayo, and topped with tangy pickles, fresh tomatoes, onions and shredded romaine. Also known as a “poor boy sandwich,” it first came into existence in 1929 during a streetcar conductor strike in New Orleans.

Representative Image Source: Pexels | dids
Representative Image Source: Pexels | dids

The Martin Brothers, who owned Martin Brother’s Coffee Stand and Restaurant, created these sandwiches to support the striking workers by feeding them after a long day of work. They made these sandwiches using New Orleans French bread and stuffing of either meat such as roast beef, or fried seafood, apart from slices of tomato, shredded lettuce, and mayo-based sauces. Apart from “Po’ boys,” another form of sandwich was invented in the Philadelphia Navy Yard during the time of WWI. They were called “hoagies.” The Yard was located on a patch of land known as Hog Island, where the workers were called “hoggies.”


via GIPHY


In the present day, the most popular sandwiches around the world, as per CNN, include England’s lobster roll, Middle East’s falafel pita, France’s croque monsieur and pan bagnat, Japan’s katsu sando, UK’s chip butty and cucumber sandwiches, New Orleans’ Po’ Boy sandwich, Mexican pambazo and Italian tramezzino. Whatever kind of sandwich it might be, it is always a delectable meal.


via GIPHY


  • 10 boys and 10 girls were left alone in separate houses. The results were shockingly different.
    A girl plays with block while two young boys play a gamePhoto credit: Canva
    , , ,

    10 boys and 10 girls were left alone in separate houses. The results were shockingly different.

    Videos showed the children living normally for the first two days, but then the experiment took a chaotic turn.

    It sounds like the plot of William Golding’s Lord of the Flies, but in the mid-2000s, it was a very real, and very controversial, reality television experiment. Footage from the UK Channel 4 documentary “Boys and Girls Alone” is captivating audiences all over again, offering a fascinating—and chaotic—look at what happens when you remove parents from the equation.

    The premise was simple but high-stakes: 20 children, aged 11 and 12, were split into two groups by gender. Ten boys and ten girls were placed in separate houses and told to live without adult supervision for five days.

    While there were safety nets in place—a camera crew was present (though instructed not to intervene unless safety was at risk), and children could ring a bell to speak to a nurse or psychiatrist—the day-to-day living was entirely up to them. The houses were fully stocked with food, cleaning supplies, toys, and paints.

    As the resurfaced footage shows, the results between the two houses could not have been more different.

    In the boys’ house, the unraveling was almost immediate. The newfound freedom triggered a rapid descent into high-energy chaos. They engaged in water pistol fights, threw cushions, and in one memorable instance, a boy named Michael covered the carpet in sticky popcorn kernels.

    The destruction escalated to the walls, which the boys covered in writing, drawing, and paint. But the euphoria of freedom eventually crashed into the reality of consequences.

    “We never expected to be like this, but I’m really upset that we trashed it so badly. We were trying to explore everything at once and got too carried away in ourselves,” one boy admitted in the footage.

    Their attempts to clean up were frantic and largely ineffective, involving scraping paint and messily mopping floors. Nutrition also took a hit; despite having completed a cooking course, the boys survived mostly on cereal, sugar, and the occasional frozen pizza. By the end of the week, the house was trashed, the garden was littered with garbage, and the group had fractured into opposing factions.

    The girls’ house, however, looked like a different planet.

    In stark contrast to the mayhem next door, the girls immediately established a functioning society. They organized a cooking roster, with a girl named Sherry preparing their first meal. They baked cakes, put on a fashion show, and drew up a scrupulous chores list to ensure the house stayed livable.

    While their stay wasn’t devoid of interpersonal drama, the experiment highlighted a fascinating divergence in socialization. Left to their own devices, the girls prioritized community and maintenance, while the boys tested the absolute limits of their environment until it broke.

    This article originally appeared last year.

  • A ‘Severance’ fan with Stage 4 cancer made a ‘bucket list’ request. Ben Stiller’s reply is perfect.
    Ban Stiller with a quote card overlayedPhoto credit: Frank Sun via Wikimedia Commons
    , , ,

    A ‘Severance’ fan with Stage 4 cancer made a ‘bucket list’ request. Ben Stiller’s reply is perfect.

    After a fan reached out with a “bucket list” wish to meet the cast, Stiller’s immediate response proved the internet can still be a force for good.

    Due to their serialized format, terrific TV shows can create a real sense of community, sparking our imaginations in ways other mediums simply cannot. The very best, like Apple TV+’s mind-bending dystopian mystery series Severance, can also offer a comforting form of escapism.

    Ben Stiller, the show’s primary director and executive producer, was reminded of that fact over X, when a hardcore fan reached out with a seemingly long-shot request:

    “Hi @BenStiller! Severance is the best show my husband and I have ever seen,” wrote Emily Powell-Heaton. “I have stage 4 cancer. A great bucket list item to check off would be to meet you and any of the cast and crew from the show. We can fly anywhere. We live near Toronto, Canada. Would this be possible? Thanks for your help!”

    Stiller, who has 5.3 million followers on the platform as of this writing, responded on the same day, asking for a DM. While we don’t know the specifics of their conversation, it appears they made plans to meet up in some fashion—potentially even with other people involved in the acclaimed show.

    “Thank you so much @BenStiller and team for making my wish come true!” they wrote. “My husband and I are over the moon about meeting you and the many other incredible people who work together to create #Severance! I am so happy.” The filmmaker replied, “Look forward to meeting you xx.”

    While social media can be a dark, depressing, divisive place, this connection highlights how it can be harnessed for good. Even the replies to their exchange were disarmingly positive, with strangers praising Stiller’s kind gesture and sending well wishes to Powell-Heaton.


    – “What a good guy. Prayers up for you, Emily!”

    – “YES!!! Fantastic… when the internet works well it really does. Xx”

    – “He is a legend! He’s made such an important dream come true!”

    – “You’re the man @BenStiller”

    – “Good on you, Ben. Emily, I hope you enjoy all things good and wish you wellness. XO”

    After the interaction with Stiller went viral, Powell-Heaton reposted an article about the news, writing, “He is a legend! He’s made such an important dream come true!”

    Powell-Heaton, who, according to their X profile, is 34 and has metastatic breast cancer, shared a health update shortly after the interaction with Stiller: “The spinal surgery is a go. No date set up yet but it’s likely to be in April. The spinal surgeon has to consult with some ENT specialists and I have to get a [CT] scan done on my face and neck area. This will determine if the surgery will be done from the back of the spinal cord or the front. A metal cage will be placed around the crumbling part of my spine to strengthen it.”

    Metastatic breast cancer, according to the Cleveland Clinic, is a cancer “that’s spread from your breast to other areas of your body.” The article states that there is no cure, “but thanks to newer treatments, more people with metastatic breast cancer are living longer than ever before.”


    In a study published in February 2025 in Cancer Causes & Control, researchers from Columbia University’s Mailman School of Public Health analyzed data from all 50 U.S. states, concluding that breast cancer cases are increasing for women under 40. “From 2001 to 2020, breast cancer incidence in women under 40 increased by more than 0.50 percent per year in 21 states, while remaining stable or decreasing in the other states,” according to a news release about the study. “Incidence was 32 percent higher in the five states with the highest rates compared to the five states with the lowest rates.”

    Rebecca Kehm, PhD, the study’s co-author and an assistant professor of Epidemiology at Columbia Mailman School, wrote that these increases are “alarming” and cannot be solely explained by genetic factors or changes in screening practices.

    This article originally appeared earlier this year.

  • Aaron Paul recalls heartbreaking exchange with his daughter that made him rethink smartphone use
    Aaron Paul recalls how his daughter made him rethink his smartphone use. Photo credit: Gage Skidmore via Wikimedia Commons, Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 2.0

    If you own a smartphone and aren’t addicted to it, I sincerely salute you from afar. It’s so easy to grow obsessed with the passive dopamine rush of browsing internet headlines and scrolling our social feeds.

    In any brief moment of everyday silence—sitting in the dentist’s waiting room, riding in the passenger seat during an argument with my wife, even waiting for commercials to end during a TV show—I find my hand unconsciously reaching for my pocket. That feels…not normal, and I often think about the effect it must have on my relationships with friends and family. It’s not like magically rewinding the clock to the dial-up era would fix everything, but maybe certain situations call for leaving our phones undisturbed.

    Actor Aaron Paul, best known as the co-star of the acclaimed series Breaking Bad, explored this subject during a recent video interview with The Wall Street Journal. Paul recalls that he was checking his email via iPhone when his daughter excitedly entered the room—and their interaction (or, at least initially, lack thereof) led him to make a profound personal change.

    “I wanna say I’m sorry”

    “I try not to use my phone in front of my kids,” he said. “My daughter comes running in, and she’s asking me a question, something, and I’m trying to just finish this quick email. And then she stopped asking, and she kind of went and started playing. And she’s 7 [now]—this is when she was 6. And I put my phone down and I went to her. And I go, ‘You know, I wanna say I’m sorry for not being responsive to you…I wanna make a pact with you right now. I wanna promise daddy’s not gonna be on his phone when he’s with you anymore.’”

    Her “one-word response” wound up leveling him. “She looks at me and she goes, ‘Really?‘ You know, just, ‘really?‘” he recalled. “And it broke my heart, you know what I mean? It really did break my heart. I go, ‘I promise you I won’t.’ And she just jumped up and threw her arms around me like she won the biggest prize. We owe it to our kids to at least give it a shot…[With] technology as a whole, you can choose whether the technology controls you. You should control the technology.”

    Can smartphone usage impact parent-child relationships?

    It appears there’s some data to support these ideas. Robin Nabi, a professor of communication at UC Santa Barbara, led a study analyzing how parents’ various media usage—including smartphones—can impact the “emotional intelligence” of their children. The findings suggested there’s a link.

    “We know that how parents express, reflect, and talk about emotions with children influences their EI (emotional intelligence) development,” she said in 2023. “And we know how easy it is for parents to be absorbed in their own phones, which could limit the interaction and feedback they give to their children. So we thought it would be important to see what role parents’ screen time and phone use around their child might play in their child’s EI development.”

    The research, which involved 400 parents of children between the ages of 5 and 12, found that “parental use of cell phones” around their kids was the only activity associated with “lower child emotional intelligence.” Nabi noted, “Kids respond to their parents. And no matter what type of content a parent may be viewing on their phone, the outward appearance to the child is a lack of responsiveness.”

Explore More News Stories

Nation

10 boys and 10 girls were left alone in separate houses. The results were shockingly different.

Nation

A ‘Severance’ fan with Stage 4 cancer made a ‘bucket list’ request. Ben Stiller’s reply is perfect.

World

Aaron Paul recalls heartbreaking exchange with his daughter that made him rethink smartphone use

Local

Police pulled over an ’80s pop icon for speeding and it turned into a hilarious photo shoot