Around 4.5 billion years ago, as Earth was still forming and only 85% of its current size, a protoplanet named "Theia," roughly the size of Mars, collided with it. The impact sent debris flying and left two massive remnants embedded deep in Earth’s molten core.
Representative Image Source: Artwork of the young Earth-Moon system. The Earth had recently formed when it was struck by a protoplanet called Theia roughly three times the size of Mars. (Photo by MARK GARLICK/Getty Images)
This collision also led to the formation of the Moon as debris from Earth broke away. A 2023 study published in Nature suggests that scientists may have finally located the two remnants of Theia, lodged deep within Earth’s core after the ancient impact, reports The Guardian.
Scientists have long known about two enormous blobs buried deep within Earth, first discovered in the 1980s during seismic activity recordings. One lies beneath the African tectonic plate and the other beneath the Pacific Ocean. It is believed that when the collision occurred, the wealth of iron contained in the fragments of Theia pushed them deep underground. The fragments sank and embedded themselves almost 1,800 miles into Earth. Meanwhile, gushes of dust and rubble were blasted into the orbit, leading to the formation of the Moon.
The team of researchers led by Dr. Qian Yuan at the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena and Professor Hongping Deng at the Shanghai Astronomical Observatory used sophisticated computer simulations of convection currents inside Earth to reconstruct the events that may have taken place during the collision. “To my knowledge, our work is the first one proposing this idea,” Yuan told the Guardian.
Representative Image Source: Earth destroyed in collision - 3D artwork illustration of planetary explosion (Getty Images)
Today, scientists call these two blobs by the name “Large Low-velocity Provinces (LLVPs)” because, in these regions, the seismic activity slows down. These continent-sized blobs are known to be much denser and hotter than the rest of the mantle rock surrounding it. Weighed together, today the blobs are six times the mass of the Moon, per Observer. “They are the largest thing in the Earth’s mantle,” Yuan said when presenting his work last week at the 52nd Lunar and Planetary Science Conference 2021.
Representative Image Source: Anatomy of the Earth's mantle, Geology nature background.Gradients used,illustration is an eps10 file and contains transparency effects (Getty Images)
According to Phys, previous research also credits Theia for bringing the life source water to the Earth, and hence, all of its life including the evolution of supercontinents. Over the years, scientists observed that these blobs were puffing our mantle plumes, or magma up towards the Earth’s surface, probably trying to catch their attention. “Theia left something in the Earth—and that played a role in Earth's subsequent 4.5 billion years of evolution," Yuan said, as per Phys. Another planetary expert Christian Schroeder said, ”The remnants of Theia potentially preserved underneath us may be responsible for important processes on Earth ongoing to this day."
Representative Image Source: Internal structure of the Earth, cutaway computer illustration. From the centre outwards, the four layers shown in the image are: inner core, outer core, mantle, and crust (Getty Images)
However, researchers aren’t fully sure about this entire theory and as Yuan said in a video, there is no evidence to prove the existence of the hypothetical planet Theia. As for the formation of the Moon, they would only know about it when they bring some of the Moon’s mantle rocks to Earth and match it with the samples from the blobs sitting in Earth’s mantle.
“I look forward to seeing future missions on the moon to bring back its mantle rocks, which are very likely to come from the impactor Theia, according to the majority of moon-forming impact simulations,” Yuan told The Guardian. “If the lunar mantle rock and LLVP-related basalts share the same chemical signatures, they should both originate from Theia.”
President Donald J. Trump and photo of a forest.
Public united and adamantly opposes Trump’s plan to roll back the Roadless Rule
There doesn't seem to be much agreement happening in the U.S. right now. Differing moral belief systems, economic disparity, and political divide have made a country with so many positives sometimes feel a little lost. Everyone desperately seeks a niche, a connection, or a strong sense of community to which they can feel a "part of," rather than just "apart."
But there seems to be one thing that the country strongly unites over, and that's the "Roadless Rule." With the Trump Administration attempting to roll back conservation policies that protect U.S. National Forests, Americans are saying in harmony an emphatic "No." A nonpartisan conservation and advocacy organization, the Center for Western Priorities, reviewed a comment analysis on the subject. After receiving 223,862 submissions, a staggering 99 percent are opposed to the president's plan of repeal.
What is the 'Roadless Rule' policy implemented in 2001?
The Roadless Rule has a direct impact on nearly 60 million acres of national forests and grasslands. According to the U.S. Department of Agriculture, the rule prohibits road construction and timber harvests. Enacted in 2001, it is a conservation rule that protects some of the least developed portions of our forests. It's considered to be one of the most important conservation wins in U.S. history.
America's national forests and grasslands are diverse ecosystems, timeless landscapes, and living treasures. They sustain the country with clean water and the wood products necessary to build our communities. The National Parks protected under their umbrella offer incredible recreational retreats and outdoor adventure.
Why does the administration want to roll it back?
U.S. Secretary of Agriculture Brooke L. Rollins told the Department of Agriculture in a 2025 press release, “We are one step closer to common sense management of our national forest lands. Today marks a critical step forward in President Trump’s commitment to restoring local decision-making to federal land managers to empower them to do what’s necessary to protect America’s forests and communities from devastating destruction from fires." Rollins continued, “This administration is dedicated to removing burdensome, outdated, one-size-fits-all regulations that not only put people and livelihoods at risk but also stifle economic growth in rural America. It is vital that we properly manage our federal lands to create healthy, resilient, and productive forests for generations to come. We look forward to hearing directly from the people and communities we serve as we work together to implement productive and commonsense policy for forest land management.”
Forest Service Chief Tom Schultz explained the Roadless Rule frustrated land management and acts as a challenging barrier to action. It prohibits road construction needed to navigate wildfire suppression and properly maintain the forest. Schultz said, “The forests we know today are not the same as the forests of 2001. They are dangerously overstocked and increasingly threatened by drought, mortality, insect-borne disease, and wildfire. It’s time to return land management decisions where they belong – with local Forest Service experts who best understand their forests and communities."
Why are people adamantly opposed to the proposed rollback?
A 2025 article in Earthjustice, a nonprofit environmental law organization, expressed its concern over the protection of national forests covering 36 states and Puerto Rico. A rescinded rule allows increased logging, extractive development, and oil and gas drilling in previously undisturbed backcountry. Here is what some community leaders had to say about it:
President Gloria Burns, Ketchikan Indian Community, said, "You cannot separate us from the land. We depend on Congress to update the outdated and predatory, antiquated laws that allow other countries and outside sources to extract our resource wealth. This is an attack on Tribes and our people who depend on the land to eat. The federal government must act and provide us the safeguards we need or leave our home roadless. We are not willing to risk the destruction of our homelands when no effort has been made to ensure our future is the one our ancestors envisioned for us. Without our lungs (the Tongass) we cannot breathe life into our future generations.”
Linda Behnken, executive director of the Alaska Longline Fishermen’s Association, stated, "Roadbuilding damaged salmon streams in the past — with 240 miles of salmon habitat still blocked by failed road culverts. The Roadless Rule protects our fishing economy and more than 10,000 jobs provided by commercial fishing in Southeast Alaska.”
The Sierra Club's Forest Campaign Manager Alex Craven seemed quite upset, saying, "The Forest Service followed sound science, economic common sense, and overwhelming public support when they adopted such an important and visionary policy more than 20 years ago. Donald Trump is making it crystal clear he is willing to pollute our clean air and drinking water, destroy prized habitat for species, and even increase the risk of devastating wildfires, if it means padding the bottom lines of timber and mining companies.”
The 2025 recession proposal would apply to nearly 45 million acres of the national forests. With so many people writing in opposition to the consensus, the public has determined they don't want it to happen.
Tongass National Forest is at the center of the Trump administration's intention to roll back the 2001 Roadless Rule. You can watch an Alaska Nature Documentary about the wild salmon of Tongass National Forrest here:
- YouTube www.youtube.com
The simple truth is we elect our public officials to make decisions. The hope is they do this for all of our well-being, although often it seems they do not. Even though we don't have much power to control what government officials do, voicing our opinions strongly enough often forces them to alter their present course of action. With a unanimous public voice saying, "No!" maybe this time they will course correct as the public wishes.