GOOD

Science Says You’ll Probably Regret Your Next Decision

From palm readers to ouija boards, humans have long tried to predict the future. Too bad we’re terrible at it.

How satisfied will you be with your life in the future? A study posed that question to 3,793 American adults ages 27 to 74, then asked them again roughly a decade later. 48 percent of participants overestimated their life satisfaction, while 22 percent underestimated it. According to Andrew Reed, PhD, a postdoctoral scholar at Stanford’s Lifespan Development Lab, the findings are consistent with a larger truth about future forecasting, one that comes up in study after study: We’re terrible at predicting how our decisions will make us feel.


As the popularity of palm readers, psychics, and Magic 8 Balls can attest, humans have a great longing to know what the future holds. Perhaps this comes from our utter incompetence at “affective forecasting,” or predicting how we’ll feel years or even minutes into the future. Reed attributes this to our tendency to “deviate from what is rational and fall prey to systematic biases when making decisions.”

Our murky perceptions of future feelings make us prone to overestimations and underestimations of the intensity and duration of our emotional reactions. Scientists call this the “impact bias,” write psychologists Timothy D. Wilson and Daniel T. Gilbert, and it plays a big role in your bad decision making. Impact bias is at work when you anticipate that a doctor’s appointment or bad score on a test will make you feel worse than it actually does, and for longer than you predict. Impact bias also plays a role in over-predicting a positive feeling—such as how good you imagine that third beer will make you feel, when in fact it might make you sick.

Wilson and Gilbert suggest this bias stems from the human desire to anticipate that the future will bring happiness, despite any evidence to the contrary. Overestimating positive feelings can bring trouble, inspiring people to jump too quickly into situations they later regret—such as a hasty cosmetic surgery or purchasing an expensive big-ticket item they can’t really afford. Yet anyone who’s ever feared a face-off with a demanding authority figure knows that overestimating negative feelings is problematic, too, sometimes leading to sweaty-palmed, stomach-quaking anxiety that’s much more uncomfortable than the confrontation itself.

However, just knowing that you’re prone to bad future forecasting can increase the odds that you’ll become a savvier predictor. Research has shown that people who score higher in “self-compassion”—a measure of how kind and forgiving a person is of their pain and failures—are more accurate at predicting their future feelings and behavior.

Plus, despite our hopelessness at fortune-telling, humans are very good at “sense making,” using rationalizations to reduce the negative consequence of an event after it has not gone the way we hoped (or predicted). Participants in one study who failed to get a job, report Wilson and Gilbert, were less upset ten minutes later “when the failure was attributable to a single capricious interviewer…easy to rationalize: ‘The guy’s a jerk.’”

With age comes wisdom of the self, as well. Older adults get better at making more accurate predictions of their emotional status, which leads to better decision making. Reed says this is attributable to older adults’ “superior experience and wisdom [and] their improved emotion regulation skills.”

He cites a Stanford study of voters about their expected and actual emotional responses to the 2008 Presidential election. Of the 762 study participants—a mix of Democrats and Republicans—they found that “age differences in actual responses to the election were consistent with forecasts,” with older adults being better able to predict how they’d feel (i.e., excited about their candidate winning, or angry if their candidate lost).

Further, current research into “mindfulness”—the practice of observing one’s actions and self without judgment—and “mindfulness based stress reduction” programs have been shown to help people increase self-knowledge and self-compassion, thus improving their ability to make better decisions. Writes Carlson, “Paying more attention to one’s current experience may help a person to overcome many informational barriers…to self-knowledge.”

So while the data suggests you’re likely to be one of many who inaccurately predict how you’ll feel in the future, some mindfulness practices and self-compassion can go a long way toward helping you make better decisions.

Illustration by Brian Hurst. Thumbnail image by Victorgrigas via Wikimedia Commons.

Articles
via Honor Africans / Twitter

The problem with American Sign Language (ASL) is that over 500,000 people in the U.S. use it, but the country has over 330 million people.

So for those with hearing loss, the chances of coming into contact with someone who uses the language are rare. Especially outside of the deaf community.

Keep Reading Show less

Looking back, the year 1995 seems like such an innocent time. America was in the midst of its longest streak of peace and prosperity. September 11, 2001 was six years away, and the internet didn't seem like much more than a passing fad.

Twenty-four years ago, 18 million U.S. homes had modem-equipped computers, 7 million more than the year before. Most logged in through America Online where they got their email or communicated with random strangers in chat rooms.

According to a Pew Research study that year, only 32% of those who go online say they would miss it "a lot" if no longer available.

Imagine what those poll numbers would look like if the question was asked today.

RELATED: Bill and Melinda Gates had a surprising answer when asked about a 70 percent tax on the wealthiest Americans

"Few see online activities as essential to them, and no single online feature, with the exception of E-Mail, is used with any regularity," the Pew article said. "Consumers have yet to begin purchasing goods and services online, and there is little indication that online news features are changing traditional news consumption patterns."

"Late Night" host David Letterman had Microsoft founder and, at that time the richest man in the world, on his show for an interview in '95 to discuss the "the big new thing."

During the interview Letterman chided Gates about the usefulness of the new technology, comparing it to radio and tape recorders.

Gates seems excited by the internet because it will soon allow people to listen to a baseball game on their computer. To which Letterman smugly replies, "Does radio ring a bell?" to laughter from the crowd.

But Gates presses Letterman saying that the new technology allows you to listen to the game "whenever you want," to which Letterman responds, "Do tape recorders ring a bell?"

Gates then tells Letterman he can keep up with the latest in his favorite hobbies such as cigar smoking or race cars through the internet. Letterman shuts him down saying that he reads about his interests in magazines.

RELATED: Bill Gates has five books he thinks you should read this summer.

The discussion ends with the two laughing over meeting like-minded people in "troubled loner chat room on the internet."

The clip brings to mind a 1994 segment on "The Today Show" where host Bryant Gumbel and Katie Couric have a similar discussion.

"What is internet anyway?" an exasperated Gumball asks. "What do you write to it like mail?"

"It's a computer billboard but it's nationwide and it's several universities all joined together and it's getting bigger and bigger all the time," a producer explains from off-stage.





Culture
Photo by Li-An Lim on Unsplash

The future generations will have to live on this Earth for years to come, and, not surprisingly, they're very concerned about the fate of our planet. We've seen a rise in youth activists, such as Greta Thunberg, who are raising awareness for climate change. A recent survey indicates that those efforts are working, as more and more Americans (especially young Americans) feel concerned about climate change.

A new CBS News poll found that 70% of Americans between 18 and 29 feel climate change is a crisis or a serious problem, while 58% of Americans over the age of 65 share those beliefs. Additionally, younger generations are more likely to feel like it's their personal responsibility to address climate change, as well as think that transitioning to 100% renewable energy is viable. Overall, 25% of Americans feel that climate change is a "crisis," and 35% feel it is a "serious problem." 10% of Americans said they think climate change is a minor problem, and 16% of Americans feel it is not a problem that worries them.

The poll found that concern for the environment isn't a partisan issue – or at least when it comes to younger generations. Two-thirds of Republicans under the age of 45 feel that addressing climate change is their duty, sentiments shared by only 38% of Republicans over the age of 45.

Keep Reading Show less
The Planet