We Need To Stop Responding To Trump With Hysteria

Trump didn’t “cut” Meals on Wheels—there’s more to the story

President Donald Trump wants to let old people die. At least that’s the hashtag (#LetThemDie) unleashed after Trump released his proposed 2018 budget framework on March 15. The 62-page document has more cuts than Edward Scissorhands, gutting funding for the Environmental Protection Agency, the Department of Agriculture, the Department of Education, and an array of other social services. But one Game of Thrones-style budget beheading reached viral hysteria: Trump’s decimating the funding to the Meals on Wheels program.

Despite such headlines as, #LetThemDie: ‘Heartless’ Donald Trump Blasted For Killing Meals On Wheels Funds” and “Trump’s Budget Would Kill a Program That Feeds 2.4 Million Senior Citizens,” things just aren’t that simple.

Meals on Wheels is not a federal program that operates solely on federal funds. It’s not directly targeted or even mentioned in Trump’s initial budget. Rather, Meals on Wheels is a nonprofit supporting senior nutrition programs across the country that has been boosted with federal support. The organization’s volunteers don’t just drive up to seniors’ homes with food in a van: The program also provides a regular friendly face for its 2.4 million recipients living in isolation and provides job training services to seniors.

“The budget doesn’t call for the elimination of Meals on Wheels, but we are still in that bucket,” said Debbie Case, president and CEO of Meals on Wheels San Diego.

But here’s where it gets sticky. Meals on Wheels is not one single national force. Instead, it’s a conglomerate of smaller, independent operations around the country. In total, there are more than 5,000 independent affiliates of Meals on Wheels across the United States and determining where their individual funds come from reveals an incredibly complicated web of funding via the government, grants, individual donations, and corporations.

Case explained that her local Meals on Wheels operates like many others, through a number of different funding sources. In all, 35 percent of her operating budget comes from the federal government through the Older Americans Act, administered by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Other federal funding support may include a combination of funds via the Community Development Block Grant, Community Services Block Grant, or the Social Services Block Grant. The remaining 65 percent often comes from corporate grants, individual donors, and other means.

How Meals on Wheels could be greatly affected by the proposed budget is through various budget reductions to nondefense discretionary programs, most specifically via the complete elimination of $3 billion in funding for the Community Development Block Grant program run through the Department of Housing and Urban Development, from which many local Meals on Wheels chapters get large chunks of funding.

However, the block grant and other government funding sources only account for $248,347, or a little over 3 percent of the nonprofit’s national total funding to run the National Research Center on Nutrition and Aging.

The most significant portion of funding comes from corporate and foundation grants, accounting for more than $5 million of the national organization’s revenue in 2016. The grants work by giving states and local townships a literal block of cash that they can use as they see fit. Some communities use portions of it for improving public spaces, while a few also parse out funding to local Meals on Wheels programs.

“Until we know what the cuts are going to be, I couldn't give you a number,” Case said when asked what donation amount her local Meals on Wheels would need to stay afloat if they lost federal funding. However, the organization is already looking for more—not less—funding and is struggling to keep pace with demand. “We’re already serving 23 million less meals since 2005,” Case explained of Meals on Wheels’ national efforts.

Ellie Hollander, President and CEO of Meals on Wheels America, said in a statement that the main problem with Trump’s proposed budget is “it is lean on details,” adding, “cuts of any kind to these highly successful and leveraged programs would be a devastating blow to our ability to provide much-needed care for millions of vulnerable seniors in America, which in turn saves billions of dollars in reduced health care expenses.”

A 2012 Brown University study echoes Hollander’s emphasis on health care savings, finding that simply investing more in delivering meals to seniors’ homes results in fewer people going to nursing homes. That’s because “low-care” seniors, those capable of living on their own with little assistance, can remain at home, thanks to funding via the Older Americans Act. This can translate into significant savings for both state and family medical costs. On average, Meals on Wheels reports it costs about $2,500 to provide a homebound senior with daily meals over one year—or roughly the same cost of an average one-day stay in the hospital or ten days in a nursing home.

The takeaway from both Hollander and Case is that we shouldn’t be so upset about whatever Trump may do. Ultimately, individual donors have more power than the government. According to Hollander, Meals on Wheels has had a tremendously successful “public-private partnership,” for which every “federal dollar is matched with about three dollars from other sources”—those sources being $5 million in corporate grants, program service fees, membership dues, and contributions from individuals and corporations.

Without question, Trump’s proposed budget is misguided at best and disgraceful at worst, and it will hurt the poor, elderly, and needy most. But to say Trump is mercilessly cutting a program that saves elderly lives is an oversimplification of the larger budget problem.

So instead of waiting around for this budget to pass, which will likely take a very long time and will absolutely take on many different forms before it is passed, what you can do right now is help Meals on Wheels stay afloat by taking part in what Case calls “the power of 7.” Donate $7, the dollar amount needed in subsidies to feed one senior one meal, and invite seven friends to do the same. Or simply volunteer your lunch hour with its Let’s Do Lunch program, which asks volunteers to deliver a quick meal and visit with a senior nearby over their lunch break. Already, the nonprofit has greatly benefited from the anti-Trump bump. Since news broke of Trump’s proposed budget, Meals on Wheels has received 50 times more donations than it normally does, and has seen a 500 percent surge in volunteer sign-ups.

Additionally, Case noted, like many other nonprofits trying to operate in the era of Trump, they need citizen’s help in contacting representatives. “We’re a boots-on-the-ground organization,” she said. “We’ve gotta get those boots on the ground to contact their federal officials and say ‘No, that’s not acceptable.’”

NHM Vienna/Hans Reschreiter

Wealth inequality has been a hot topic of discussion as of late, but it's something that's occurred all throughout history. Class structure is a complicated issue, especially when you consider that haves and have nots have been in existence for over 4,000 years.

A study published in Science took a look at over 100 late Neolithic and early Bronze Age skeletons found in a burial site in southern Germany. The study "shed light on the complexity of social status, inheritance rules, and mobility during the Bronze Age." Partly by looking at their teeth and the artifacts they were buried with, researchers were able to discover that wealth inequality existed almost 4,000 years ago. "Our results reveal that individual households lasting several generations consisted of a high-status core family and unrelated low-status individuals, a social organization accompanied by patrilocality and female exogamy, and the stability of this system over 700 years," the study said.

Keep Reading Show less

Climate change means our future is uncertain, but in the meantime, it's telling us a lot about our past. The Earth's glaciers are melting at an alarming rate, but as the ice dwindles, ancient artifacts are being uncovered. The Secrets of the Ice project has been surveying the glaciers on Norway's highest mountains in Oppland since 2011. They have found a slew of treasures, frozen in time and ice, making glacier archeologists, as Lars Pilø, co-director of Secrets of the Ice, put it when talking to CNN, the "unlikely beneficiaries of global warming."

Instead of digging, glacier archeologists survey the areas of melting ice, seeing which artifacts have been revealed by the thaw. "It's a very different world from regular archaeological sites," Pilø told National Geographic. "It's really rewarding work.

Keep Reading Show less

When former Pittsburgh Steelers' center Mike Webster committed suicide in 2002, his death began to raise awareness of the brain damage experienced by NFL football players. A 2017 study found that 99% of deceased NFL players had a degenerative brain disease known as CTE (chronic traumatic encephalopathy). Only one out of 111 former football players had no sign of CTE. It turns out, some of the risks of traumatic brain injury experienced by heavily padded adults playing at a professional level also exist for kids with developing brains playing at a recreational level. The dangers might not be as intense as what the adults go through, but it can have some major life-long consequences.

A new PSA put out by the Concussion Legacy Foundation raises awareness of the dangers of tackle football on developing brains, comparing it to smoking. "Tackle football is like smoking. The younger I start, the longer I am exposed to danger. You wouldn't let me smoke. When should I start tackling?" a child's voice can be heard saying in the PSA as a mother lights up a cigarette for her young son.

Keep Reading Show less
via Gage Skidmore / Flickr

On Tuesday morning, President Trump tweeted about some favorable economic numbers, claiming that annual household income is up, unemployment is low, and housing prices are high.

Now, just imagine how much better those numbers would be if the country wasn't mired in an economy-killing trade war with China, bleeding out trillion-dollar-a-year debts, and didn't suffer from chaotic leadership in the Oval Office?

At the end of tweet, came an odd sentence, "Impeach the Pres."

Keep Reading Show less

October is domestic violence awareness month and when most people think of domestic violence, they imagine mostly female victims. However, abuse of men happens as well – in both heterosexual and homosexual relationships. But some are taking it upon themselves to change all that.

Keep Reading Show less