As promised, all this week GOOD’s new Food hub will be hosting a blog festival—a multi-site online conversation looking at food writing from as broad and unusual a variety of perspectives as possible. Over the next six days, more than 40 of my favorite writers—from science bloggers and human rights reporters to design critics and food columnists—will be sharing their perspectives on what makes food so interesting.

We’re calling it “Food For Thinkers,” and although most of the participants will be posting on their own sites, you can keep up with the entire conversation here at GOOD Food HQ, where I’ll be hosting links, adding my own responses, and asking for your comments. We’ll also be using the Twitter hashtag #foodforthinkers on @GOODFoodHQ, if you prefer to follow along that way.


In last week’s launch post, welcoming you to GOOD’s new Food hub, I said that one of the most important ideas behind the site is the belief that food is an incredibly useful lens through which to understand and re-imagine the world we live in. The other, connected idea that shapes the site’s editorial direction is that we think food is too important a topic to restrict the conversation to self-identified foodies (ourselves included). My hope is that by the end of this week, after this amazing group of writers and researchers from very different fields take a look their own subject matter through the lens of food, we’ll have a whole new set of answers to the question: What does—or could, or even should—it mean to write about food today?

Put another way, I want to know what happens when a music blogger thinks about food. What does a space archaeologist or an architect want to read and say about food? What kinds of things interest a science writer in food, and why?

Another aspect of this is that food writers think about what they’re doing and why it’s important in profoundly different and interesting ways—and I want to question those assumptions, have a debate, and figure out, in the process, what isn’t being covered yet. I want to ask why we food writers are excited about what we’re doing, but also where we can turn for new inspiration—and why non-food writers might find inspiration in food, too.

And I want to provoke comments from readers—readers who read food writing and readers who don’t, GOOD Food readers and tech blog readers—about why food matters to them.

And most of all, I want to get people excited about how many interesting ways there are to write and think about food, and feature links to the community of writers and thinkers who inspire me. Getting a bunch of those folks all together to talk about what’s interesting about food and what’s not is genuinely exciting to me, and I hope it will be to you, too.

So: Watch this space! We’ll be hearing from Varick Shute (Urban Omnibus) Alice Gorman (Space Age Archaeology), Evan Kleiman (KCRW’s Good Food), Daniel Fernández Pascual (Deconcrete), Zackery Denfield (Center for Genomic Gastronomy), Rebecca Federman (Cooked Books), Annie Wang (Frites and Fries), Jonathan Bloom (Wasted Food), Jeremy Cherfas (Agricultural Biodiversity Weblog), James Casey (Swallow Magazine), Lisa Bramen (Food & Think), David A. Garcia, Rachel Laudan, Yen Ha & Michi Yanagashita (Lunch with Front Studio), Tom Nealon (Cruditas/Hilobrow), Colleen Morgan (Middle Savagery), Katherine Sutcliffe (Boring History Girl), Bryan Finoki (Subtopia), Maggie Schmitt (The Gaza Kitchen), Helena Bottemiller, Danielle Gould (Food+Tech Connect), John Thorne (Simple Cooking), Aki Kamozawa (Ideas in Food), Steve Silberman (NeuroTribes), Geoff Manaugh (BLDGBLOG), Nicholas Jackson (The Atlantic Tech), Robin Sloan (Snarkmarket), Marion Nestle (Food Politics), Jessica Helfand (Design Observer), Alexandra Lange (Design Observer), Dechen Pemba (High Peaks Pure Earth), Tim Maly (Quiet Babylon), Smudge Studio (Friends of the Pleistocene), Alex Trevi (Pruned), Kristen Taylor, Drew Tewksbury, Laura Brunow Miner (Pictory), Dan Pashman (The Sporkful), James Reeves (Big American Night), Jonah Campbell (Still Crapulent), Dan Maginn, Scott Geiger, and Nick Sowers, as well as GOOD’s own Morgan Clendaniel, Alissa Walker, Andrew Price, Peter Smith, and Allison Arieff.

And, I hope, we’ll also be hearing from you, either in the comments, or perhaps on your own blog or Tumblr (if so, please email me at nicola[at]goodinc[dot]com with the link).

It’s time to tie on our bibs, pop a Rolaid, and get ready to dive in to an all-you-can-read feast of new ideas and fresh perspectives—I can’t wait.

  • Man’s dog suddenly becomes protective of his wife, Internet clocks the reason right away
    Dogs have impressive observational powers.Photo credit: Canva

    Reddit user Girlfriendhatesmefor’s three-year-old pitbull, Otis, had recently become overprotective of his wife. So he asked the online community if they knew what might be wrong with the dog.

    “A week or two ago, my wife got some sort of stomach bug,” the Reddit user wrote under the subreddit /r/dogs. “She was really nauseous and ill for about a week. Otis is very in tune with her emotions (we once got in a fight and she was upset, I swear he was staring daggers at me lol) and during this time didn’t even want to leave her to go on walks. We thought it was adorable!”

    His wife soon felt better, butthe dog’s behavior didn’t change.

    pregnancy signs, dogs and pregnancy, pitbull behavior, pet intuition, dog overprotection, Reddit stories, viral Reddit, dog instincts, canine emotions, dog owner tips
    Otis knew before they did. Canva

    Girlfriendhatesmefor began to fear that Otis’ behavior may be an early sign of an aggression issue or an indication that the dog was hurt or sick.

    So he threw a question out to fellow Reddit users: “Has anyone else’s dog suddenly developed attachment/aggression issues? Any and all advice appreciated, even if it’s that we’re being paranoid!”

    The most popular response to his thread was by ZZBC.

    Any chance your wife is pregnant?

    ZZBC | Reddit

    The potential news hit Girlfriendhatesmefor like a ton of bricks. A few days later, Girlfriendhatesmefor posted an update and ZZBC was right!

    “The wifey is pregnant!” the father-to-be wrote. “Otis is still being overprotective but it all makes sense now! Thanks for all the advice and kind words! Sorry for the delayed reply, I didn’t check back until just now!”

    Redditors responded with similar experiences.

    Anecdotal I know but I swear my dog knew I was pregnant before I was. He was super clingy (more than normal) and was always resting his head on my belly.

    realityisworse | Reddit

    So why do dogs get overprotective when someone is pregnant?

    Jeff Werber, PhD, president and chief veterinarian of the Century Veterinary Group in Los Angeles, told Health.com that “dogs can also smell the hormonal changes going on in a woman’s body at that time.” He added the dog may “not understand that this new scent of your skin and breath is caused by a developing baby, but they will know that something is different with you—which might cause them to be more curious or attentive.”

    The big lesson here is to listen to your pets and to ask questions when their behavior abruptly changes. They may be trying to tell you something, and the news may be life-changing.

    This article originally appeared last year.

  • Throughout history, women have stood up and fought to break down barriers imposed on them from stereotypes and societal expectations. The trailblazers in these photos made history and redefined what a woman could be. In doing so, they paved the way for future generations to stand up and continue to fight for equality.

  • ,

    Why mass shootings spawn conspiracy theories

    Mass shootings and conspiracy theories have a long history.

    While conspiracy theories are not limited to any topic, there is one type of event that seems particularly likely to spark them: mass shootings, typically defined as attacks in which a shooter kills at least four other people.

    When one person kills many others in a single incident, particularly when it seems random, people naturally seek out answers for why the tragedy happened. After all, if a mass shooting is random, anyone can be a target.

    Pointing to some nefarious plan by a powerful group – such as the government – can be more comforting than the idea that the attack was the result of a disturbed or mentally ill individual who obtained a firearm legally.


Explore More Articles Stories

Articles

Man’s dog suddenly becomes protective of his wife, Internet clocks the reason right away

Articles

14 images of badass women who destroyed stereotypes and inspired future generations

Articles

Why mass shootings spawn conspiracy theories

Articles

11 hilarious posts describe the everyday struggles of being a woman