U.S. Universities Still Attracting Science-Minded Chinese and Indian Students

A lot has been made about the fact that the U.S. is lagging behind the world's two most populous countries, China and India, in training the next...

A lot has been made about the fact that the U.S. is lagging behind the world's two most populous countries, China and India, in training the next generation of scientists, mathematicians, and engineers. American entrepreneur Robert Compton made a film about it--trailer embedded below--and the Obama administration's STEM program is a clear attempt to address the disparity. As a first generation Indian-American, I can tell you that even in my community (which is about as liberal and open-minded an Indian community as you'll fine), almost every kid I grew up earned an analytical degree in college (from engineering to economics).The one thing people forget is that while we may be training fewer 18 year-old Americans who want future careers in science and technology, we've got the market cornered on churning scientists and engineers out of our institutes of higher learning. I actually reported on this very issue a few years ago when I was on staff at Seed magazine; our university is set up to allow the sort of innovation that drives technological change and wins prestigious awards, such as Nobel Prizes.Also, while we outsource some of our jobs to India and China, we attract many of their brightest students. As this graphic from The Economist explains, we have nearly 35,000 Chinese and Indian nationals in our universities (according to numbers from the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). And over the last ten years, the number of students heading our way from China and India, has increased by 8.5 and 9.3 percent, respectively.The real issue: Keeping these great minds here. Something the rise of the Chinese and Indian economies (combined with the downturn in the U.S.) is likely to make very difficult, as this Berkeley survey found.[youtube]
via Barry Schapiro / Twitter

The phrase "stay in your lane" is usually lobbed at celebrities who talk about politics on Twitter by people who disagree with them. People in the sports world will often get a "stick to sports" when they try to have an opinion that lies outside of the field of play.

Keep Reading

The Free the Nipple movement is trying to remove the stigma on women's breasts by making it culturally acceptable and legal for women to go topless in public. But it turns out, Free the Nipple might be fighting on the wrong front and should be focusing on freeing the nipple in a place you'd never expect. Your own home.

A woman in Utah is facing criminal charges for not wearing a shirt in her house, with prosecutors arguing that women's chests are culturally considered lewd.

Keep Reading

In August, the Recording Academy hired their first female CEO, Deborah Dugan. Ten days before the Grammys, Dugan was placed on administrative leave for misconduct allegations after a female employee said Dugan was "abusive" and created a "toxic and intolerable" work environment. However, Dugan says she was actually removed from her position for complaining to human resources about sexual harassment, pay disparities, and conflicts of interest in the award show's nomination process.

Just five days before the Grammys, Dugan filed a complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and her claims are many. Dugan says she was paid less than former CEO Neil Portnow. In 2018, Portnow received criticism for saying women need to "step up" when only two female acts won Grammys. Portnow decided to not renew his contract shortly after. Dugan says she was also asked to hire Portnow as a consultant for $750,000 a year, which she refused to do.

Keep Reading