The Brownlee brothers, two triathletes from Yorkshire, have consistently showcased not just athletic excellence but also remarkable brotherly love. In one memorable race, just minutes before the finish line, Jonathan Brownlee began to stumble, feeling disoriented, dehydrated, and exhausted from the intense heat. That’s when his brother Alistair stepped in. Alistair sacrificed his own chance to win the race, choosing instead to support Jonathan in a dramatic finish at the World Triathlon Series in Cozumel, Mexico.



Jonny was leading as he entered the final kilometer of the 10k run, but the heat overwhelmed him, causing him to stumble off track. Just as Jonny stopped at the side, Alistair came to his aid, putting his arm around him and helping him through the final few hundred meters, even pushing him across the finish line. Jonny finished the race in second place, behind Spain’s Mario Mola. Alistair, who could have won the race himself, chose instead to help his brother, sacrificing his own victory in a moment that inspired athletes worldwide. After the race, Jonny tweeted from his hospital bed, “Not how I wanted to end the season, but gave it everything. Thanks Alistair Brownlee, your loyalty is incredible.”



However, not everyone was pleased with the dramatic finish. The Spanish Triathlon Federation filed an appeal to disqualify Jonny for accepting assistance during the race. Fortunately, the International Triathlon Union rejected the appeal, pointing to a rule that allows athletes to receive help from others.



According to The Guardian, the winner Mola later said in an interview, “First of all this was not how I wanted to win the world championship. Luckily I was able to be in the top five considering Jonny didn’t win the race. To be honest I was already considering that the role of AIistair was to help Jonny. Considering that, I thought, well, I’m going to be second again, but at least I will fight to the end. And when I heard Jonny isn’t feeling well, I thought, ‘I need to fight to the end’. We want everyone to be safe after the finish line. It’s not the way I wanted it, but that’s triathlon.”

The brotherly gesture of Alistair not only helped Jonathan in the race but also inspired millions of budding sportsmen who learned what it truly means to be a sportsman. Human first, sportsman second!

  • Pregnant mom asks for first-class seats. The internet couldn’t wait to deliver a reality check.
    Photo credit: CanvaA passenger sits in first class
    ,

    Pregnant mom asks for first-class seats. The internet couldn’t wait to deliver a reality check.

    A pregnant mom asked if front-row passengers should move so she could sit with her toddler on a flight. The internet wasn’t on her side.

    Flying with a young child isn’t always smooth sailing, especially when it comes to seating arrangements. A soon-to-be mother, known online as Deekaytwo, found herself turning to the internet for advice after wondering if it was fair to ask front-row passengers to swap seats so she could sit with her toddler. But the reaction she got online was anything but supportive.

    On Mumsnet, she shared the details of her travel situation: “We’ve got row 7A and C seats booked on our upcoming four-hour flight. The middle seat is blocked off, and we always use it for our nearly 2-year-old son after take-off and before landing.”

    airplane etiquette, flying with kids, seat swap debate, toddler travel, viral parenting story
    A young toddler plays with the back of an airplane seat. Photo credit: Canva

    She normally books front-row spots for ease, but those were unavailable this time. Now seated farther back, she worried about managing the flight with her young child. “According to the seat map, 1C and F are empty (typically reserved for gold members), and these usually open up just before the flight,” she explained.

    The thought of moving closer to the front lingered on her mind. To make it work, though, one of the passengers in the prime 1A or 1D seats would need to trade places so her family could sit together. “Am I being unreasonable to move us to the empty seats in the front row and hope/expect 1A or 1D to move so we can sit together? They’d still have their aisle/window and avoid sitting next to a baby, so I think it’s a win-win,” she wrote, pointing out she was five months pregnant.

    airplane etiquette, flying with kids, seat swap debate, toddler travel, viral parenting story
    Image of the seats in question. Photo credit: Mumsnet |u00a0Deekaytwo

    She even laid out two clear options for the forum to consider: “Stay in your current seats and let the fancy gold members keep the empty seat next to them!” or “It doesn’t make any difference to them and will make your journey more comfortable, probably everyone else’s too, as her son will have more room to be contained.” With more than 200 replies pouring in, the overwhelming response was that her expectations weren’t fair.

    The community didn’t hold back. “No, you cannot expect someone to move for your convenience. Book seats that work for you and assume that any that are already booked will remain occupied by someone else,” wrote user BreakfastAtMimis.

    airplane etiquette, flying with kids, seat swap debate, toddler travel, viral parenting story
    A mom sits with her toddler on an airplane. Photo credit: Canva

    Another, HoHoHoliday, chimed in, “Don’t set out to make someone else feel annoyed. Choose seats that are already available for you to sit next to each other. It’s only a four-hour flight, you should be able to manage your own child for that time.” ThanKyoualMee added, “Only book it if you’re prepared to travel in the seats you’ve booked! I wouldn’t book on the provision you need someone to swap with you, personally, I’d keep your current seats sat together.”

    This article originally appeared two years ago. It has been updated.

  • Just thinking about tequila, whiskey or wine shifts your mindset – new research
    Photo credit: Arturo Peña Romano Medina/E+ via Getty ImagesMost celebrations in the U.S. involve alcohol, in large part due to marketing and advertising.
    ,

    Just thinking about tequila, whiskey or wine shifts your mindset – new research

    Different drinks cue different identities before a sip is taken.

    Thinking about certain types of alcohol can alter your mood and trigger certain mindsets, especially among young consumers. For instance, tequila calls up a party mindset, whiskey activates a masculine mindset, and wine primes a sophistication mindset.

    Those are the key takeaways of a new study my team and I published in the journal Young Consumers.

    We carried out four studies with 429 total participants to examine the cultural themes and moods people associate with different types of alcohol.

    We conducted two preliminary studies to understand how people think about different types of alcohol. In the first study, participants answered open-ended questions, and in the second they completed a word-association task. These studies helped us identify common cultural associations, which we call “learned associations,” or ideas people develop through experience and cultural exposure.

    We used these associations to create questions about alcohol-related mindsets. Participants rated how much they felt different qualities when thinking about a randomly assigned type of alcohol in response to the prompt, “I feel ___ when thinking about this type of alcohol.” For example, the sophisticated mindset included sophisticated, elegant, classy, formal and fancy; the masculinity mindset included masculine, tough, confident, manly and strong; and the party mindset included energetic, outgoing, fun, like partying and like celebrating.

    Then we conducted two experiments where participants were randomly assigned to think about either wine, whiskey or tequila and respond to the mindset questions, allowing us to test whether different types of alcohol evoke different associations.

    Importantly, participants did not consume alcohol, allowing us to isolate the learned associations these drinks evoke, separate from alcohol’s physiological effects.

    Clear patterns emerged. Tequila was frequently associated with words like fun, wild, celebration and party. Whiskey elicited terms such as strong, rugged, confident and masculine. Wine, by contrast, was associated with elegance, class, refinement and sophistication.

    These findings show that alcohol can function as a “symbolic cue.” In other words, the mindsets people associate with different drinks appear to originate from learned associations rather than from intoxication itself.

    Why it matters

    More than half of the U.S. adult population consumes alcohol: 54% in 2025. This is the lowest level recorded since Gallup began tracking the drinking habits of adults in the U.S. in 1939, and it marks a decline from 1997-2023, when over 60% of adults reported drinking.

    Some drink to enhance experiences, while others drink for enjoyment, socializing or even escapism. For others, drinking may become compulsive or difficult to control, defined as an alcohol use disorder.

    Research increasingly shows that even moderate drinking can carry health risks, including higher risks of several cancers.

    A considerable amount of research on alcohol has explored what happens as a result of drinking. Studies have found that people become uninhibited and make risky decisions when they drink. Other researchers have found that people pick up ideas and habits about drinking from the world around them and that advertising can influence what, when and how young people drink.

    Fans of the popular sitcom “How I Met Your Mother” might recall an episode titled ‘The Perfect Cocktail.“ In this episode, different alcoholic beverages reflect the personalities of Marshall (Jason Segel) and Barney (Neil Patrick Harris). It’s funny and engaging, but what if there’s a real psychological basis for these associations?

    Such learned associations have not been thoroughly studied – in particular, it’s unknown whether they can activate distinct drinking mindsets even without actual consumption.

    One reason why this is important is that even though Gen Zers drink less alcohol than previous generations, they are still exposed to alcohol-related media and cultural cues. Understanding these psychological cues may help explain how alcohol-related social norms and expectations develop and influence drinking decisions.

    What’s next

    Learned associations for different alcoholic drinks can influence how people feel, which in turn might shape their intentions, choices and social expectations. For example, if thinking about tequila prompts a “party” mindset, it could influence how a person plans their evening and what choices they make.

    A better understanding of these associations could help public health campaigns promote moderation and responsible drinking, such as pacing drinks, staying hydrated and avoiding overconsumption. Future research could examine how these associations form in different social contexts, how they vary across age groups or cultures, and how interventions might shift them to further reduce risky behaviors and encourage safer, more responsible alcohol consumption.

    The Research Brief is a short take on interesting academic work.

    This article originally appeared on The Conversation. You can read it here.

  • A pet‑friendly homeless shelter pilot reduced the rate of homelessness among the people it helped in California
    Photo credit: Mario Tama/Getty Images A homeless woman in Los Angeles holds her dog after a free veterinary visit in 2024.
    ,

    A pet‑friendly homeless shelter pilot reduced the rate of homelessness among the people it helped in California

    A California program suggests pets can play a bigger role in helping people find stability.

    When homeless shelters allow people to stay with their dogs and other pets, more unhoused people become more willing to stay in a shelter.

    That’s what my team at the University of Southern California’s Homelessness Policy Research Institute learned when we evaluated California’s Pet Assistance and Support Program.

    California’s Department of Housing and Community Development established this pilot program in 2019. Its goals were straightforward: to make homeless shelters more accommodating to people with pets – mostly dogs – so that people living on the streets don’t have to choose between staying in shelters or abandoning their pets.

    The program disbursed US$15.75 million between 2020 and 2024 to 37 organizations across the state. The funding allowed shelters to build kennels or other pet-friendly spaces, provide pet food and supplies, and offer basic veterinary care. It also covered the costs of staffing and maintaining insurance required to operate pet-friendly shelters.

    Evaluating the program

    We did this evaluation in collaboration with My Dog Is My Home, a nonprofit that supports pet-inclusive housing and services for the homeless, and the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals.

    By all accounts, the program was a success.

    We found that the program helped 4,407 people experiencing homelessness keep their pets while getting support. Many were able to enter shelters, and their animals received needed veterinary care. A total of 886 people ultimately moved into permanent housing with their pets – a higher success rate than the statewide average for homeless people in California.

    Theoretically, this funding should have reduced the number of pet owners living on the streets. Yet since 2019, the year the program began, the number of homeless people in Los Angeles with dogs and other pets has increased.

    A homeless man walks a dog toward a group of tents lining a sidewalk.
    A homeless man walks a dog toward a group of tents lining a Los Angeles sidewalk in 2026. Qian Weizhong/VCG via Getty Images

    I’ve seen this change firsthand.

    Since 2017, I’ve led the USC research team that produces the annual homeless count estimates for Los Angeles. The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development requires this exercise for any city seeking federal funding for homelessness services.

    One of the questions my team asks when interviewing thousands of homeless people each year is whether they have any pets.

    Before the pandemic, we generally found that roughly 1 in 8 people did. We also found that nearly half of homeless pet owners had been turned away from a homeless shelter because it couldn’t accommodate their animal.

    Despite programs like California’s Pet Assistance and Support program, my research team has found that the share of people living on the streets of Los Angeles who say they have a pet increased to roughly 1 in 5 by 2025.

    Need for more pet-friendly programs

    We still don’t know why the share of homeless people with pets has gotten so much larger.

    It could be that rising housing costs, which is the main driver of homelessness, is pushing more pet owners into homelessness. Or, perhaps more homeless are adopting pets to deal with their social isolation and loneliness, two common conditions for people with nowhere to go.

    An apartment building with a rectangular green space is shown.
    The Weingart Tower, where some of Los Angeles’ formerly homeless people reside and receive social services, has a small dog park. Grace Hie Yoon/Anadolu via Getty Images

    Either way, proposed cuts by the federal government to affordable housing and homeless services will only make matters worse.

    The number of homeless people in Los Angeles has fallen by more than 4% since 2023 to just over 72,000 people in 2025. But based on my research findings, I would expect the number of people living on the city’s streets – with and without pets – to rise over time unless more affordable housing becomes available.

    And growth in the homeless population may be hard to avoid without more efforts like California’s Pet Assistance and Support Program – on a larger scale than the pilot we studied.

    This article originally appeared on The Conversation. You can read it here.

Explore More Health Stories

Well-being

A pet‑friendly homeless shelter pilot reduced the rate of homelessness among the people it helped in California

Well-being

‘Eternal Loop’ question asks how you’d spend eternity if you could only do one thing over and over

Health

Controversy over Reese’s ingredients reveals standard food industry practices most consumers never notice

Health

Researchers are blowing people’s minds after revealing the ideal shower length