During His Phoenix Speech, It Became Painfully Clear Donald Trump Doesn’t Know What ‘Clean Coal’ Means

“We’ve ended the war on beautiful, clean coal,” he said immediately before revealing he doesn’t understand what clean coal is.

During a typically unfocused and blustery speech in Phoenix on Tuesday night, President Trump touched on an issue he’s addressed many times prior: coal. More specifically, he spoke to the rally about clean coal, a technology that he’s championed repeatedly despite his apparent inability to understand what exactly “clean coal” is as a product or a concept.

Here’s his understanding of how clean coal works, as he conveyed it to the attendees and a national television audience:

He remarked: “We’ve ended the war on beautiful, clean coal. And it’s just been announced that a second brand-new coal mine where they’re going to take out clean coal — meaning they’re taking out coal, they’re going to clean it — is opening in the state of Pennsylvania.”

What Trump described is nothing close to the actual process that results in “clean coal,” a term the coal industry itself came up with to rebrand its product in the face of potential climate change legislation.

In reality, clean coal is just … coal. It’s what happens after coal is burned that makes differentiates clean coal from regular coal.

Popular Mechanics explains clean coal both in theory and in practice, saying the label has been slapped on myriad technologies and processes used to market coal as being better for the Earth than it actually is. However, when the term is most often used, it’s shorthand for a process called carbon capture and storage (CCS).


CCS is the trapping of carbon emissions from burned coal followed by the storage of that trapped carbon somewhere safer than our air — generally underground.

President Trump seems to be convinced that clean coal is something as intuitive as the name suggests. You get some coal, you clean it, then you burn the cleaner stuff and it’s … beautiful. There is a process known as “washing coal” that removes the ash content from mined coal before it’s burned, but if Trump didn’t know what clean coal was, there’s little chance he misattributed the name to a lesser-known process.

As the country has seen time and again, Trump is ignoring the facts to suit his own ends. But he’s hardly alone in that regard when it comes to the concept of “clean coal.” According to Popular Mechanics, an effective CCS operation can capture about 90% of the carbon dioxide produced at a plant, but this statistic fails to address the countless other byproducts released when burning a fossil fuel. Mercury, nitrogen oxide, and other compounds will often still find their way into our air.

It’s doubtful that the nation needs a reminder here, but just in case: Don’t get your science education from President Donald Trump.

via Barry Schapiro / Twitter

The phrase "stay in your lane" is usually lobbed at celebrities who talk about politics on Twitter by people who disagree with them. People in the sports world will often get a "stick to sports" when they try to have an opinion that lies outside of the field of play.

Keep Reading

The Free the Nipple movement is trying to remove the stigma on women's breasts by making it culturally acceptable and legal for women to go topless in public. But it turns out, Free the Nipple might be fighting on the wrong front and should be focusing on freeing the nipple in a place you'd never expect. Your own home.

A woman in Utah is facing criminal charges for not wearing a shirt in her house, with prosecutors arguing that women's chests are culturally considered lewd.

Keep Reading

In August, the Recording Academy hired their first female CEO, Deborah Dugan. Ten days before the Grammys, Dugan was placed on administrative leave for misconduct allegations after a female employee said Dugan was "abusive" and created a "toxic and intolerable" work environment. However, Dugan says she was actually removed from her position for complaining to human resources about sexual harassment, pay disparities, and conflicts of interest in the award show's nomination process.

Just five days before the Grammys, Dugan filed a complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and her claims are many. Dugan says she was paid less than former CEO Neil Portnow. In 2018, Portnow received criticism for saying women need to "step up" when only two female acts won Grammys. Portnow decided to not renew his contract shortly after. Dugan says she was also asked to hire Portnow as a consultant for $750,000 a year, which she refused to do.

Keep Reading