One State Wants To Give New Parents More Money And More Time Off Than Any Other

Three reasons Washington’s family leave act is the new gold standard.

This summer, Washington became the fifth state to pass a family leave act. In the United States, all employers are required by federal law to give new parents (birth and adopted) 12 weeks off work. That sounds pretty good, but there are a few problems. The main one: That time off doesn't have to be paid.

[quote position="left" is_quote="true"]This is a revolutionary bill. This is going to break down the walls for other states.[/quote]

Yet nothing ramps up the stress of welcoming a new baby quite like losing a steady paycheck. Thankfully, more and more companies are stepping up to offer paid time off for new moms, dads, and even employees who need to take time away to help a sick or dying family member. But the overall coverage is still subpar, with over 100 million American workers having no access to paid leave.

It's left legislators on the city and state levels scrambling to fill in the gaps.

California, New Jersey, Rhode Island, and New York were the first states to act. But Washington, the most recent, has them all beat. Washington's version of family leave passed this summer after more than a decade of debate, and will go into effect in 2020.

Washington Gov. Jay Inslee. Photo by David Ryder/Getty Images.

Here are three key reasons it represents a huge step forward in how we think about family leave:

1. Most employers are required to chip in.

Family leave acts in the other four states are either mostly or entirely funded by employees themselves. But companies in Washington will also pay into a fund — about half the amount that their employees do. (It's only a few dollars per week, but it's enough to fund the entire program.) If a company has under 50 employees or already provides generous paid leave options, it can opt out of the government program.

Getting extra help from employers means more money to go around, which also means…

2. Better coverage for low-income workers.

As is usually the case, low-income families suffer the most from improper paid leave. Washington remedies that by offering to pay up to 90% of a worker's salary for 12 weeks of leave if that salary is below the state average. (Compare that to Rhode Island's program, which dishes out about 60% of your salary for only four weeks.)

There's also coverage for the not-insignificant number of people who are self-employed — about 15 million people in the United States work for themselves.

3. It helps everyone, not just parents.

The big boost in benefits — and the length of those benefits — opens up family leave to more than just new moms who are physically incapable of returning to work immediately after giving birth. It encourages people to take time away to care for a family member, to fully recuperate from a major illness, or to grieve a serious loss.

Turns out, taking care of our physical and mental health is actually better for our productivity.

Washington's plan isn't perfect. Ideally, no one would have to choose between taking a percentage of their salary and taking the time off their family needs.

But this plan, inspired by what other states have done, has expanded the definition of adequate coverage. It'll continue to serve as a building block for even better legislation in the future.

"This is a revolutionary bill," parenting advocate Kristin Rowe-Finkbeiner told The Seattle Times. "This is going to break down the walls for other states."

Screenshot via (left) Wikimedia Commons (right)

Greta Thunberg has been dubbed the "Joan of Arc of climate change" for good reason. The 16-year-old activist embodies the courage and conviction of the unlikely underdog heroine, as well as the seemingly innate ability to lead a movement.

Thunberg has dedicated her young life to waking up the world to the climate crisis we face and cutting the crap that gets in the way of fixing it. Her speeches are a unique blend of calm rationality and no-holds-barred bluntness. She speaks truth to power, dispassionately and unflinchingly, and it is glorious.

Keep Reading Show less
The Planet
Ottawa Humane Society / Flickr

The Trump Administration won't be remembered for being kind to animals.

In 2018, it launched a new effort to reinstate cruel hunting practices in Alaska that had been outlawed under Obama. Hunters will be able to shoot hibernating bear cubs, murder wolf and coyote cubs while in their dens, and use dogs to hunt black bears.

Efforts to end animal cruelty by the USDA have been curtailed as well. In 2016, under the Obama Administration, the USDA issued 4,944 animal welfare citations, in two years the numbers dropped to just 1,716.

Keep Reading Show less

The disappearance of 40-year-old mortgage broker William Earl Moldt remained a mystery for 22 years because the technology used to find him hadn't been developed yet.

Moldt was reported missing on November 8, 1997. He had left a nightclub around 11 p.m. where he had been drinking. He wasn't known as a heavy drinker and witnesses at the bar said he didn't seem intoxicated when he left.

Keep Reading Show less
via Real Time with Bill Maher / YouTube and The Late Late Show with James Corden / YouTube

A controversial editorial on America's obesity epidemic and healthcare by comedian Bill Maher on his HBO show "Real Time" inspired a thoughtful, and funny, response by James Cordon. It also made for a great debate about healthcare that Americans are avoiding.

At the end of the September 6th episode of "Real Time, " Maher turned to the camera for his usual editorial and discussed how obesity is a huge part of the healthcare debate that no one is having.

"At Next Thursday's debate, one of the candidates has to say, 'The problem with our healthcare system is Americans eat shit and too much of it.' All the candidates will mention their health plans but no one will bring up the key factor: the citizens don't lift a finger to help," Maher said sternly.

Keep Reading Show less
via Gage Skidmore

The common stereotypes about liberals and conservatives are that liberals are bleeding hearts and conservatives are cold-hearted.

It makes sense, conservatives want limited government and to cut social programs that help the more vulnerable members of society. Whereas liberals don't mind paying a few more dollars in taxes to help the unfortunate.

A recent study out of Belgium scientifically supports the notion that people who scored lower on emotional ability tests tend to have right-wing and racist views.

Keep Reading Show less