Fr. Hyacinth Marie Cordell, O.P., a Dominican priest based in Philadelphia, walked into the reception hall as he normally would, having just officiated a wedding. As a highly skilled drummer—one who achieved Internet fame with his viral performance videos—he was surprised but delighted to see live musicians set up and ready to play. “I walked past the stage, and all the guys waved at me and said, ‘We follow you on Instagram,’” he tells GOOD over Zoom with a laugh. “They asked me to come up, and I played ‘Respect’ by Aretha Franklin.”

That’s just one surreal example of how Fr. Hyacinth’s life has changed since June 2024, when he posted his first drum video—a meticulous recreation of a jazzy, complex beat by Tay Dever. “For years I’d stayed away from social media,” he says, a slender and bespectacled fellow wearing a white habit and standing in front of a chalkboard. “I didn’t really understand it. I never had a Facebook account. I generally had a negative view of social media.” But he joined Instagram for two reasons: to stay in touch with a local drummer who posts frequently on the platform and to keep up with his “favorite drummer,” Dana Hawkins.

“I didn’t even look at [Instagram] that often,” he recalls. “I didn’t really know how it worked. It just seemed like these short videos of people trying to get attention. That was my first impression. [Laughs.] It just didn’t really interest me. But of course [the algorithm] learns your interests. There was one time I opened it up in June of last year, and I saw this guy Tay Dever play a really cool drum beat, and I was like, ‘Man, I’d love to be able to play something like that.’ I looked in the comments section and saw that a lot of people guessed how to play this beat [laughs], and I could see that they were all wrong.”

On his day off, Fr. Hyacinth went over to St. Patrick’s church hall, where his drum kit was set up. After some “trial and error,” he jotted down a quick drum transcription and decided to record his work—partly for the musical challenge, partly as a way of sharing his findings with the drum community. He was, of course, completely unaware how this decision would change his life. But it was admittedly a humble beginning: “I literally put my cell phone—I didn’t even have a tripod with me—on a music stand,” he says. “I just tried to angle it so it wouldn’t fall. It didn’t occur to me afterward, but I had the microphone against the bottom of the stand. It’s shaking, not great resolution, and so on. Then I had to figure out how to share both the transcription and the video. I didn’t know how to do that, but I copied the link and threw it in the comments section of Tay’s video. I said, ‘For all of you who are wanting to know how to play this: Here’s the transcription, and here’s a video of me playing it.

“And by the way, I just so happen to be a Catholic priest.’”

To his shock, the post started to spread, leading to mountains of followers (187,000 as of this writing), and he’s continued posting ever since—always decked out in his priestly attire, demonstrating complex polyrhythms and thunderous double-kick patterns as he explores the realms of jazz-fusion, hard rock, prog-rock, and metal. He’s made fans in every corner of the drum world, racking up press coverage and making tons of famous fans along the way. He’s also created a rare comment section where almost everyone—both famous virtuoso musicians and wide-eyed hobbyists, religious people and atheists alike—is united in their love of both the playing and his story. (The good-spirited jokes have become part of the fun—everything from “”He doesn’t play ghost notes, he plays holy spirits” to “fire from the friar.”)

But Fr. Hyacinth was never aspiring for Internet fame, and he’s using his social-media influence to lift up his hodgepodge digital parish. For most of his drum videos, he connects his rhythms and musicality to some greater ideal, whether religious or secular (Sample: “Another African-inspired 2-over-3 experiment, dedicated to the virtue of respect – #polyrhythm #drums #beat #groove #africa #respect #virtue #Catholic #christian“). GOOD spoke to the world’s most beloved priest drummer about his background, unexpected life change, and what it’s like bashing the kit in a tunic.

Playing on the streets of Austin, TX while in town for a wedding Photo credit: courtesy ofu00a0Fr. Hyacinth Marie Cordell, O.P.

Tell me about your drumming background. I know you studied music at The University of North Texas one year. Did you initially hope to be a professional musician, and how did that lead to becoming a priest?

I was exposed to drums through my father when I was young. He was a professional drummer and percussionist for a while, but he was also a pilot. The music career, at least what he was doing, wasn’t great for marriage, so he basically gave up drums and got a job with an airplane insurance company. He’s from Texas, and his family moved to California. He got a job in Denver, and they transferred him to Chicago, where I was raised. When I was younger, I think he had a pad and some drum sticks laying around, and every once in a while he would borrow a drum set, just to play for a town play or something. Then he would show me some beats. I thought it was the coolest thing to have this drum set, and that got me interested in drums. In fourth grade, I took up drums and played in band and orchestra through the rest of elementary school, middle school, and high school. I got more serious going along. There was a drummer who was one year older than I was, although in the same grade, in middle school and high school who was very advanced, and I learned a lot of things through him. I was also taking drum lessons, and I subscribed to Modern Drummer magazine, so I was reading about all the greats. I tried to get all the cassette tapes—and, later, CDs—as I could, exploring the whole world of drumming and all the amazing drummers who’s influenced me. In high school, back in the days of VHS tapes, they had all these instructional videos from Dave Weckl or Terry Bozzio, and I would eat things up and try to learn from them.

So that was your dream path at the time?

I wanted to be a famous drummer and be in a band. That’s what I wanted to do with my life. I went to college for a year, but at the same time there was a spiritual journey going on, and inevitably I felt God calling me in that direction. I wasn’t exactly sure how these things would mesh, but after one year of college, I wound up going the spiritual route. I always loved drums, but in large measure I gave it up for years. I got back into it in various time windows, and then I’d give it up again. But it’s always been in me, and I’ve always been interested in great drummers and music. In the last few years in Philadelphia, a city known for the arts, I’ve made a lot of musical connections and started playing with a local Catholic artist. I needed a better drum set, so I slowly—through saving up monthly allowances, through donations from family, or people giving gifts—basically built up [the drum kit] you see today.

You’re a big fan of progressive music and have talked about how you really respond to complexity. If I were to put you on the spot, could you give me your top five progressive bands?

From the ’70s, it’s hard to say. Gentle Giant is definitely one of them. The old Rush, especially [1978’s] Hemispheres, which is my favorite Rush album, and A Farewell to Kings. I like Rush later on, but the more they get into the ’80s or ’90s, it’s like, “Eh.” I would say Yes, of course. I never got into Genesis that much, but at some point I started listening to them a little more and got to appreciate them as well. I never really got into King Crimson—every once in a while I would dabble, and I respect them. I like a lot of fusion music. When I was younger, I would gravitate toward fusion music, whether that’s in the rock realm, which is more like prog, or in the jazz realm. But anything fusion, I gravitated toward, whether it’s Chick Corea and Allan Holdsworth or Rush. I only discovered Gentle Giant a few years ago. But growing up, you had all these things that, if you advanced in music, you were expected to fit into. You either went the rock direction or jazz or classical. I loved it all, but I could never fully get into just one of those styles. It just felt so limiting. I loved the combination that is fusion. Back then, I didn’t know anybody who had those same interests. Nowadays, maybe it doesn’t sell, but it’s a huge interest out there. Drummers generally love fusion, and there are a lot of fusion and prog lovers out there. I’ve been connecting with all these people who love all this music I’ve always loved.

music, friar, priest, Catholicism, music, drummer
Fr. Hyacinth with Animals as Leaders (left) / Fr. Hyacinth with Tigran Hamasyan (right) Photo credit: courtesy of Fr. Hyacinth Marie Cordell, O.P.

The response to your videos was pretty immediate, right?

I posted [the first video], and one of the first comments was, “Just commenting before this blows up.” I thought that was funny because I was like, “Yeah, right. That’s never gonna happen.” There’s a guitarist friend I have who’s on Instagram, and he was like, “You’re starting to go viral.” I was skeptical. I thought, “There’s viral and then viral and viral. If there are views, it’s going to be low-key.” I had to figure out how to look at the numbers, and I was like, “Whoa.” That was on a Friday, June 14th, but two days later, it was a busy Sunday, but I managed to sneak into the hall and thought, “I’ll just post a couple more beats.” I did [a beat by the instrumental prog-metal band] Animals as Leaders—when I saw [drummer] Matt Garstka do it some years ago, I thought, “That’s awesome!” I also did another beat I came up with, inspired by some of my favorite drummers. I didn’t even know you were supposed to space things out [on Instagram]—I think I just posted them together. I had no idea what I was doing. I did not expect at all that the Animals as Leaders video would take off. I don’t know if it was within a week or two weeks, but it now has like two million views. [Animals as Leaders guitarist] Tosin Abasi commented. I was like, “What is going on?” I’ve been posting videos since.

You’ve been embraced by the heavy-music community after playing “Bleed” by the extreme-metal band Meshuggah.

Early on, people insisted that I play “Bleed.” They didn’t realize that the Animals as Leaders song is more difficult than “Bleed.” I didn’t know why people were demanding it. It’s advanced and difficult, but a lot of drummers do it. But I thought, “Fine.” I didn’t want to just play the beat—I wanted to do something interesting with it, so I played some things over the foot ostinato. I had no idea that was going to be the most popular video. [Drummer] El Estepario even did a funny reaction video and at the end said, “Everybody follow this guy!” It was almost like it just took off in the first month or so, and I didn’t expect any of that to happen. I’ve just been trying to have fun with it. I’ve loved playing on the set and just experimenting. I’ve been doing this for a few years now where I just come up with stuff on my own. Nobody hears or cares, but I’m having fun on my day off. It’s surreal to me that people around the world like these little things I come up. Now I see the positive side of social media too—it’s a good way to connect with people, and try to have an influence toward what’s good.

One of my favorite things about your story is how it’s unified people, both religious and non-religious. The comment sections of your videos are true melting pots—you have atheist metal-heads and worship-band leaders all liking the same posts. Is that something you expected, or have you been surprised by that?

There definitely has been some negativity—I’ve had to delete comments and sometimes block people. That’s the vast minority of people, and I don’t see any avoiding that. But I am surprised. I’m amazed. The amount of followers, I don’t even know how to keep with it. But they’re all over the world—I’m connecting with people from [places like] Togo and Indonesia. Also, connecting with some of my favorite drummers has floored me. Like you said, it’s people all over the spectrum. I went into this not knowing what I was doing or what to expect, and I wasn’t looking for any of this, but it’s interesting—[I see] people who identify themselves as Jewish, Muslim, Atheist, Catholic, Protestant, Orthodox, Hindu, and so on. Of course, I welcome everyone. What I try to do is share reflections in the comments. Some of it will be from more of a Catholic perspective, and you can take it or leave it. And I’ll purposely give a reflection on something that can hopefully be for everyone, regardless of their background. I try to keep it positive. I try to avoid getting into debates—I don’t think it’s healthy, the way people debate online. If people do have questions or want to have a healthy debate, I tell them to DM me so we can set up a phone call or something like that. [In the comments], it often turns into ad hominem or attacking the person and being emotional and not respectful. Some issues have a lot of nuance and depth, and small comments in social media [aren’t conducive to that]. In my own way, I’m hoping to point people not to me but ultimately to God—to goodness, to truth, to what’s good and positive. I try to uplift people.

One of my favorite videos of yours is a beautiful New Age piano piece in 5/4. Do you have a lot of your own compositions, and have you considered recording an album of them?

Good question—I would love to. I come up with all these ideas that I think are neat, but I think the hardest thing is fashioning them into a song where there’s an arc and the transitions all work. It’s more like all these individual pieces. That’s the hard thing. I have all these ideas on guitar, but I never really learned formally and my technique is not great. I know basic theory. I do have one guitar piece that’s a full composition that I would love to record. Maybe there’s a way I could piece it together, but I’m not good enough to play it through without mistakes. When I was younger, I dove into rhythm. I have a lot of flaws in my [drumming], but people always ask, “How do you find time?” I practiced a lot when I was younger, so there are a lot of fundamentals there. Even with having years off, it’s just like riding a bike—it just takes a little bit to get back into it.

People obviously respond to your incredible drumming, but there’s also a real feeling of surprise and intrigue about seeing a priest playing drums, especially such complex music. Do you take any kind of satisfaction in breaking a stereotype?

It’s still so surreal to me. Some people thought I was a gimmick: “Why are you wearing this? You’re just trying to get views or likes.” I’m like, “No, I’m a consecrated religious. This is what I wear every day.” When I go to celebrate mass, there are all these vestments that I put on top of this. But this is medieval street clothes. I joke about being goth and all that—we were founded in the Middle Ages. [Laughs.] I’m not gonna change out of this in order to play drums. I just learn to play with it. I know it looks odd. It’s strange to me—why did God give me this gift of music but call to this [life], and somehow they go together? When I was younger, I would have seen myself as being married and in a rock group or fusion group or prog. I know it’s strange, but I’m not trying to be strange. [Laughs.] I come up with stuff I like and post it, and if people like it, great. If they don’t, OK. But I’m really not trying to do things for likes or applause. You have to be real. If you’re trying to be fake, it’s obvious. You’re not yourself. With some videos, it just seems obvious that they’re doing something very outlandish just to get attention. If there was no camera, they would never do something like this. But I’m not here to judge anybody.

In the Protestant world, you have a lot of gospel drummers, and they’re some of the best on Earth. They play during their services, but in the traditional Catholic/Orthodox liturgies, it’s not the kind of thing where you just bring in a band. It’s a different way of worshipping. That’s why we have chant—it’s text- and vocal-dominant, and all the instruments are supposed to support that. It’s contemplative and prayerful. It’s serving something sacred. That’s what’s strange about [me] being Catholic—you don’t expect a priest who loves that kind of ritual to be playing drums. There are prominent Catholics who play drums—and some priests—but I guess it’s kind of unique to see a priest getting into complex music and being out there, even though that’s not what I’m trying to do.

Did your parishioners already know about your drumming abilities? Have any of them been shocked when you suddenly became Internet-famous?

Some people are like, “That’s fine what you’re doing,” but they want to caution me against social media. I’m like, “Yeah, I’m trying to be careful.” Some are on Instagram, and some are not. But some people ask about it all the time, and they’re really excited about it: “What’s new with the Instagram thing?” We haven’t had a lot of people [come to the church after seeing his videos]. Some people have visited when they’re traveling through. It’s funny—whenever I go to a concert here in Philly, whether it’s rock or prog or whatever or even Tigran, there will be various people who come up to me: “I follow you on Instagram!” Sometimes someone will say that on the street. One time I was walking into a wedding reception, and I just hear this voice behind me: “Oh, do you play drums?” Which is a funny question to ask somebody in a white habit. [Laughs.] Some people have asked about coming to a service, but we’re not getting a ton of people. I wish we could get a ton of people coming to church! But it’s not about me, right? [Laughs.]

  • Italian man claims to be ‘human cheetah’ with lightning-fast reflexes
    Photo credit: CanvaA man with fast reflexes.

    At first glance, this probably looks like a camera trick. Ken Lee, an Italian content creator, has built a massive online following by doing something that doesn’t quite feel real. Viewers refer to him as the “human cheetah” because it appears he has near-instant reflexes.

    Grabbing objects out of the air with uncanny precision, flicking clothespins and lighters, and throwing a blur of punches and kicks at impossible speeds, it is easy to call him unbelievable. Half the audience thinks his viral speed videos are fake. The other half is just as convinced they are watching something incredibly rare.

    Hands so fast they blur time

    In the video above, a timer runs to confirm its authenticity. In what looks like half a second, he reaches out and snags the lighter from the table. To prove it is real, he does it twice.

    Having amassed millions of followers on his TikTok page, the identity behind the mysterious influencer remains largely unknown. Active since around 2022, with almost 100 million accumulated likes, Lee has cultivated a fandom around his self-proclaimed “Superhero per Hobby!”

    Do you believe it is real? Is this person the fastest human alive? Many followers cannot wait for the next video to be posted. Plenty of his fervent fans are Italian, so sifting through the remarks takes a bit of hunting. Here are some comments that sum up how much people enjoy the fun and the spectacle:

    “Ken lee the fastest and the best”

    “Most dangerous human”

    “Is this what the lighter sees before my homie steals it”

    “It was sped up during he grabbed the lighter, if u count up with the timer u would be off by like 0,5 seconds whenever he grabs the lighter.”

    “If the flash were human”

    “How is it possible to get such powers ?”

    “I blinked and I missed it”

    People love good entertainment

    The awe of peak performance attracts people to watch elite athletes, musicians, or even dancers. There is something that deeply satisfies all of us when a human appears to push a skill to its limit. Whether it is real or fake seems to matter less than the opportunity to chime in on some good entertainment.

    How far could any of us go by practicing and repeating a particular motion over and over until it is mastered? Beneath the flashy nickname and his viral speed videos, Lee’s content has a way of drawing people in. This is not a superpower. Just repetition. Focus. Obsession. And maybe some digital wizardry.

    Testing the science of speed

    If you wish to question the validity of Lee’s performances, maybe some basic science can help. Human reaction time is not just a reflex. A 2024 study found that the nervous system can fine-tune responses in real time. Practice can make movements appear almost automatic.

    It has been well established in research that the gap between seeing something and responding has a limit. A 2025 study concluded that the most elite extremes allow for reaction times of 100 milliseconds. At that speed, the human brain can barely process that something has happened.

    Science explains Lee is not necessarily moving as fast as we might perceive him to be. And therein lies all the fun of it. We cannot prove it is real, nor can we actually prove that it is fake.

    Maybe Lee is the “fastest man alive” or the so-called “human cheetah.” Or maybe he is just a remarkable entertainer. Either way, he has clearly tapped into something strange and fascinating: a blend of human ability and fantasy that people do not want to miss.

    To give context to Lee’s videos, watch this performance on Tú Sí Que Vales:

  • Despite all the likes, literallys and dropped g’s, English isn’t decaying before our eyes
    Photo credit: LisaStrachan/iStock via Getty Images Fear not: There isn’t anything that needs saving.

    As a linguistics professor, I’m often asked why English is decaying before our eyes, whether it’s “like” being used promiscuouslyt’s being dropped deleteriously or “literally” being deployed nonliterally.

    While these common gripes point to eccentric speech patterns, they don’t point to grammatical annihilation. English has weathered far worse.

    Let’s start with something we can all agree on: Old English, spoken from approximately A.D. 450 to 1100, is pretty unintelligible to us today. Anyone who’s had the pleasure of reading “Beowulf” in high school knows how different English back then used to sound. Word endings did a lot more grammatical work, and verbs followed more complicated patterns. Remnants of those rules fuel lingering debates today, such as when to use “whom” over “who,” and whether the past tense of “sneak” is “snuck” or “sneaked.”

    The language went on to experience centuries of tumult: Viking invasions, which introduced Old Norse influence; Anglo-Norman French rule, which shifted the language of the elite to French; and 18th-Century grammarians, who dictated norms with their elocution and grammar guides.

    In that time, English has lost almost all of the more complex linguistic trappings it was born with to become the language we know and – at least, sometimes – love today. And as I explain in my new book, “Why We Talk Funny: The Real Story Behind Our Accents,” it was all thanks to the way that language naturally evolves to meet the social needs of its speakers.

    From dropping the ‘l’ to dropping the ‘g’

    The things we tend to label as “bad” or sloppy English – for instance, the “g” that gets lost from our -ing endings or the deletion of a “t” when we say a word like “innernet” – actually reflect speech habits that are centuries old.

    Take, for example, “often.” Originally spoken with the “t,” that pronunciation gradually became less favored around the 15th century, alongside that “l” in “talk” and the “k” in know. Meanwhile, the “s” now stuck on the back of verbs like “does” and “makes” began as a dialectal variant that only became popular in 16th-century London. It gradually replaced “th” whenever third persons were involved, as in “The lady doth protest too much.”

    While dropping the “l” in talk may have been initially frowned upon, today it would be strange if you pronounced the letter. And the shift makes sense: It smoothed out some linguistic awkwardness for the sake of efficiency.

    If people learned to look at language more like linguists, they might come around to seeing that there is more than one perspective on what good speech consists of.

    And yes, that absolutely is a sentence ending with a preposition – something many modern grammar guides discourage, even though the idea only took hold after 18th-century grammarian Robert Lowth intimated it was a less elegant choice based on the model of Latin.

    Though Lowth voiced no hard and fast rule against it, many a grammar maven later misconstrued his advice as an admonition. Just like that, a mere suggestion became grammatical law.

    The rise of the grammar sticklers

    Many of today’s ideas about what constitutes correct English are based on a singular – often mistaken – 19th-century view of the forces that govern our language.

    In the late 18th century, the English-speaking world began experiencing class restructuring and higher literacy rates. As greater class mobility became possible, accent differences became class markers that separated new money from old money.

    Emulation of upper-crust speech norms became popular among the nouveau riche. With literacy also on the rise, grammarians and elocutionists raced to dictate the terms of “proper” English on and off the page, which led to the rise of usage guides and dictionaries that were eager to sell a certain brand of speech.

    Another example of grammarian angst reconfiguring the view of an otherwise perfectly fine form is the droppin’ of the “g.” It became so tied to slovenly speech that it was branded with an apostrophe in the 19th century to make sure no one missed its lackadaisical and nonstandard nature.

    Up until the 19th century, however, no one seemed to care whether one pronounced it as “-in” or “-ing.”

    Evidence suggests that -ing wasn’t even heard as the correct form. Many elocution guides from the 18th century provide rhyming word pairs like “herring/heron,” “coughing/coffin” and “jerking/jerkin,” which suggest that “-in” may have been the preferred pronunciation of words ending with “-ing.” Even writer and satirist Jonathan Swift – a frequent lobbyist for “proper” English – rhymes “brewing” with “ruin” in his 1731 poem “Verses on the Death of Dr. Swift, D.S.P.D..”

    Embrace the change

    Language has always shifted and evolved. People often bristle at changes from what they’ve known to what is new. And maybe that’s because this process often begins with speakers that society usually looks less favorably on: the young, the female, the poor, the nonwhite.

    But it’s important to remember that being disliked and bad are not the same thing – that today’s speech pariahs are driven by the same linguistic and social needs as the Londoners who started going with “does” instead of “doth” or dropped the “t” in often.

    So if you think the speech that comes from your lips is the “correct” version, think again. Thou, like every other English speaker, art literally the product of centuries of linguistic reinvention.

    This article originally appeared on The Conversation. You can read it here.

  • 10 boys and 10 girls were left alone in separate houses and the different results are just wild
    Photo credit: Ian Taylor PhotographerTwo young children play in the grass.

    It sounds like the plot of William Golding’s Lord of the Flies. However, in the mid-2000s, it was a very real and very controversial reality television experiment.

    Footage from the UK Channel 4 documentary Boys and Girls Alone is captivating audiences all over again. It offers a fascinating and chaotic look at what happens when you remove parents from the equation.

    The premise was simple but high stakes. Twenty children, aged 11 and 12, were split into two groups by gender. Ten boys and ten girls were placed in separate houses and told to live without adult supervision for five days.

    The Setup

    While there were safety nets in place, the day-to-day living was entirely up to the kids. A camera crew was present but instructed not to intervene unless safety was at risk. The children could also ring a bell to speak to a nurse or psychiatrist.

    The houses were fully stocked with food, cleaning supplies, toys, and paints. Everything they needed to survive was there. They just had to figure out how to use it.

    The Boys: Instant Chaos

    In the boys’ house, the unraveling was almost immediate. The newfound freedom triggered a rapid descent into high-energy anarchy.

    They engaged in water pistol fights and threw cushions. In one memorable instance, a boy named Michael covered the carpet in sticky popcorn kernels just because he could.

    The destruction eventually escalated to the walls. The boys covered the house in writing, drawing, and paint. But the euphoria of freedom eventually crashed into the reality of consequences.

    “We never expected to be like this, but I’m really upset that we trashed it so badly,” one boy admitted in the footage. “We were trying to explore everything at once and got too carried away in ourselves.”

    Their attempts to clean up were frantic and largely ineffective. Nutrition also took a hit. Despite having completed a cooking course, the boys survived mostly on cereal, sugar, and the occasional frozen pizza. By the end of the week, the house was trashed, and the group had fractured into opposing factions.

    The Girls: Organized Society

    The girls’ house looked like a different planet.

    In stark contrast to the mayhem next door, the girls immediately established a functioning society. They organized a cooking roster, with a girl named Sherry preparing their first meal. They baked cakes. They put on a fashion show. They even drew up a scrupulous chores list to ensure the house stayed livable.

    While their stay wasn’t devoid of interpersonal drama, the experiment highlighted a fascinating divergence in socialization. Left to their own devices, the girls prioritized community and maintenance. The boys tested the absolute limits of their environment until it broke.

    The documentary was controversial when it aired, with critics questioning the ethics of placing children in unsupervised situations for entertainment. But what made it so enduring, and why footage keeps resurfacing years later, is what it reveals about how kids are socialized long before anyone puts them in a house together. The boys weren’t born anarchists and the girls weren’t born organizers. They arrived at those houses already shaped by years of being told, implicitly and explicitly, what boys do and what girls do. Whether that’s a nature story or a nurture story is the question the documentary keeps asking without quite answering, which is probably why people are still watching and arguing about it nearly two decades later.

    This article originally appeared two years ago. It has been updated.

Explore More Culture Stories

Internet

Italian man claims to be ‘human cheetah’ with lightning-fast reflexes

Culture

Despite all the likes, literallys and dropped g’s, English isn’t decaying before our eyes

Culture

10 boys and 10 girls were left alone in separate houses and the different results are just wild

Media

9-year-old girl asks Steph Curry why his shoes aren’t in girls’ sizes. The response was perfect.