How You Spend—And How You Don't—Reveals Something Larger About Your Financial Ego

Here's how to win the daily battle between instant gratification and long-term happiness

I traded a lot of my life recently: a salaried job with health benefits and 401(k) in New York City for a set of lower paying gigs in the much cheaper city of Philadelphia. The change necessitated a huge number of financial trade-offs, some of which were part of the conscious decision to move, and some of which were not. I quickly realized that without a steady salary, I would give up certain things even to afford my modest $775 rent: open bar tabs, expensive tickets, shopping sprees, too many Seamless orders. But I didn’t necessarily realize that in restructuring my daily finances, I would also reset my priorities with money entirely.

As long as we’re making enough money to survive, most of us probably don’t think that hard about our trade-offs, but, whether or not we realize it, “everyone of us makes money trade-offs nearly everyday,” says New York Times columnist Ron Lieber. “All too often these trade-offs are subconscious, which means we don’t discuss them openly and fail to question them relentlessly.” But we should—because even the smallest money decisions have larger implications. When I moved to pursue larger “life goals”—writing, a relationship—I cut everyday expenses in favor of larger experiences. I rarely eat out anymore, but I’ve made a point to travel. The $297 I pay in health insurance every month gives me the freedom to write, but it means I can’t spend $300 at random on new clothes anymore.

In order to consciously question the priorities we are setting with our spending, I talked to others about what money trade-offs they were making. In so many cases, we are trading easy gratification—an expensive lunch, new clothes, a house upgrade—for more long-term sources of happiness: early retirement, a move overseas, kids. It’s in these smaller details of our financial lives that our real priorities come to light.

Trade: Homemade lunch for Mad Men-style cocktails

Jared, 26, New York City, law clerk

I make all my meals at home (and bring my own coffee to work) in order to indulge in an overpriced cocktail once a week, specifically at lavish hotel bars. While $16 gimlets seem like a horrible use of my paycheck, I refuse to let my romantic Mad Men notions of Manhattan slip away. My once-a-week indulgence allows a brief moment of escapism from my muddy French press coffees and plastic-wrapped PB&Js.

Trade: Cutting out T.J. Maxx trips for IVF

Laura, 30, Hartford, Connecticut, stay-at-home parent

We spent thousands and thousands of dollars on IVF (in vitro fertilization) due to fertility issues, so I consciously wasn't spending on frivolous things. When it comes to holidays or my birthday, I always joke, ‘Just get me diapers!’ I’m not a big spender to begin with, so I can't really say I cut anything out, but I do think twice before purchasing a shirt I don't need from T.J. Maxx.

Trade: Living with my parents for a move to Europe

Haley, 26, upstate New York, crop consultant

I’m currently living with my parents in order to finance a move to Europe. Even though I’m not spending money on rent, I still almost never go out, and I limit my shopping to things I need for work, the move, or rock climbing; outdoor clothes and boots, climbing shoes, a new suitcase, and passport renewal. Sometimes it sucks to meet people out and only order a beer when everyone else is eating, but thinking about having the freedom to take time to explore once I move makes it easier to go without things I’m tempted to spend money on. By living with my parents and not overspending, I probably save $1200 per month (compared to when I lived in New York City).

Trade: Being the college cleaning person for free college tuition

Kim, 59, Kenosha, Wisconsin, former cleaning professional, current receptionist

I opted for a lower paying job with good benefits. Cleaning at a college was not my career of choice; however, doing so provided tuition remission for two children (worth around $300,000 in total), which I would never have been able to do had I not worked at the college. Doing without is not always a bad thing.

Trade: Packed lunch for my ice hockey hobby

Luke, 27, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, medical student

I'll be the first to admit that I pack a lunch daily and brew my morning coffees with maybe too much frequency. I only have so much money to spend on extras—sports, traveling, socializing—so when it comes time to pay the $400 fee for my ice hockey league each year, I take solace in the fact that the fees are offset by my packed lunches.

Trade: Small house in an affordable town for early retirement

Darrow, 56, Chattanooga, Tennessee, retired software engineer

In order to retire early, my wife and I bought a modest sized house in low-priced Tennessee to raise our son, and lived there for 17 years without upsizing. Aside from not inflating our lifestyle, this saved us $10,000 to $20,000 in transaction costs on buying/selling homes.

via Alan Levine / Flickr

The World Health Organization is hoping to drive down the cost of insulin by encouraging more generic drug makers to enter the market.

The organization hopes that by increasing competition for insulin, drug manufacturers will be forced to lower their prices.

Currently, only three companies dominate the world insulin market, Eli Lilly, Novo Nordisk and Sanofi. Over the past three decades they've worked to drastically increase the price of the drug, leading to an insulin availability crisis in some places.

In the United States, the price of insulin has increased from $35 a vial to $275 over the past two decades.

Keep Reading Show less

Oh, irony. You are having quite a day.

The Italian region of Veneto, which includes the city of Venice, is currently experiencing historic flooding. Venice Mayor Luigi Brugnaro has stated that the flooding is a direct result of climate change, with the tide measuring the highest level in 50 years. The city (which is actually a collection of 100 islands in a lagoon—hence its famous canal streets), is no stranger to regular flooding, but is currently on the brink of declaring a state of emergency as waters refuse to recede.

Keep Reading Show less
The Planet

Since the International Whaling Commission banned commercial whaling in 1986, whale populations have been steadily recovering. However, whales in the wild still face other dangers. In the summer of 2018, four Russian companies that supply aquariums with marine animals captured almost 100 beluga whales and killer whales (aka orcas). After a public outcry, those whales are swimming free as the last of the captive whales have been released, the first time this many captured whales have been released back into the wild.

In late 2018 and early 2019, a drone captured footage of 11 orcas and 87 beluga whales crammed into holding pens in the Srednyaya Bay. The so-called "whale jail" made headlines, and authorities began to investigate their potentially illegal capture.

Keep Reading Show less
The Planet
via Twitter / Bye,Bye Harley Davidson

The NRA likes to diminish the role that guns play in fatal shootings by saying, "Guns don't kill people, people kill people."

Which is the same logic as, "Hammers don't build roofs, people build roofs." No duh. But it'd be nearly impossible to build a roof without a hammer.

So, shouldn't the people who manufacture guns share some responsibility when they are used for the purpose they're made: killing people? Especially when the manufacturers market the weapon for that exact purpose?

Keep Reading Show less
via Gage Skidmore / Flickr

The 2020 election is a year away, but Donald Trump has some serious ground to cover if he doesn't want it to be a historical blowout.

A Washington Post- ABC News poll released Tuesday shows that Trump loses by double digits to the top Democratic contenders.

Vice President Joe Biden (56%-39%); Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts (54%-39%); Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont (56%-39%); South Bend, Indiana, Mayor Pete Buttigieg (52%-41%); and Sen. Kamala Harris of California (52%-41%) all have big leads over the president.

Keep Reading Show less