Facebook Falls Under Fire For Exaggerating The Number Of People The Platform Can Reach

This will be a tough position to defend.

While few would be surprised by most any figure that Facebook shares regarding its seemingly endless reach, Facebook’s methods for deriving statistics made available to advertisers have been once again called into question, and the most recent discrepancy appears to be a patently quantifiable issue. Facebook touted to its advertising partners through its proprietary Ads Manager feature, the platform’s ability to “reach” 41 million Americans aged 18-24. To a layman, the number may not appear to be outside the realm of possibility, but a researcher offered a summary rebuttal as to why that simply isn’t possible.

The 2016 census data shows that only 31 million people in that age group reside in the United States.

Similarly, the company’s claim that it could target 60 million Americans aged 25-34 is undercut by census data revealing only 45 million people in that age group reside in the U.S.

Brian Wieser of Pivotal Research Group was the party responsible for revealing the discrepancy, which has put Facebook’s practices, long held under lock and key, under the media microscope.

Facebook has countered the accusation of number inflation by offering a high-level explanation of what goes into determining the company’s audience reach. A Facebook spokesperson offered that estimates “are based on a number of factors, including Facebook user behaviors, user demographics, location data from devices, and other factors.” She added, “They are not designed to match population or census estimates. We are always working to improve our estimates.”

Claiming that the company’s figures were never meant to stack up against census figures, one must ask, “What, exactly, is Facebook’s reach intended to convey to data-hungry advertisers?”

The data, according to the Wall Street Journal, is intended to reflect the data that users with Facebook accounts share with the platform. Further introducing the possibility for error is the fact that ultimate figures are extrapolated from sample sizes using guarded methods. These two factors don’t change the fact that advertisers are charged based on the users they reach and not the person behind them. Based on these discrepancies, an advertiser paying to reach the 18-24 American demographic could be charged as much as 32% to reach fake, duplicate, or otherwise “empty” accounts.

The issue, once initially examined, appears to be surfacing among other demographics and markets as well.

This controversy comes after several smaller allegations that Facebook inflated the reach advertisers were being charged for with their campaigns. Facebook attributed the errors to a “measurement bug” and quietly doled out refunds to the affected parties.

This more recent and glaring development serves as a natural, albeit valid, criticism from the many enemies and competitors of the social media juggernaut.

The most interesting fallout may be the changes Facebook makes to either produce more conservative reach estimates or provide more transparency in how they derive the figures. If history is any indication, they’ll pursue the former.

Screenshot via (left) Wikimedia Commons (right)

Greta Thunberg has been dubbed the "Joan of Arc of climate change" for good reason. The 16-year-old activist embodies the courage and conviction of the unlikely underdog heroine, as well as the seemingly innate ability to lead a movement.

Thunberg has dedicated her young life to waking up the world to the climate crisis we face and cutting the crap that gets in the way of fixing it. Her speeches are a unique blend of calm rationality and no-holds-barred bluntness. She speaks truth to power, dispassionately and unflinchingly, and it is glorious.

Keep Reading Show less
The Planet
Ottawa Humane Society / Flickr

The Trump Administration won't be remembered for being kind to animals.

In 2018, it launched a new effort to reinstate cruel hunting practices in Alaska that had been outlawed under Obama. Hunters will be able to shoot hibernating bear cubs, murder wolf and coyote cubs while in their dens, and use dogs to hunt black bears.

Efforts to end animal cruelty by the USDA have been curtailed as well. In 2016, under the Obama Administration, the USDA issued 4,944 animal welfare citations, in two years the numbers dropped to just 1,716.

Keep Reading Show less

The disappearance of 40-year-old mortgage broker William Earl Moldt remained a mystery for 22 years because the technology used to find him hadn't been developed yet.

Moldt was reported missing on November 8, 1997. He had left a nightclub around 11 p.m. where he had been drinking. He wasn't known as a heavy drinker and witnesses at the bar said he didn't seem intoxicated when he left.

Keep Reading Show less
via Real Time with Bill Maher / YouTube and The Late Late Show with James Corden / YouTube

A controversial editorial on America's obesity epidemic and healthcare by comedian Bill Maher on his HBO show "Real Time" inspired a thoughtful, and funny, response by James Cordon. It also made for a great debate about healthcare that Americans are avoiding.

At the end of the September 6th episode of "Real Time, " Maher turned to the camera for his usual editorial and discussed how obesity is a huge part of the healthcare debate that no one is having.

"At Next Thursday's debate, one of the candidates has to say, 'The problem with our healthcare system is Americans eat shit and too much of it.' All the candidates will mention their health plans but no one will bring up the key factor: the citizens don't lift a finger to help," Maher said sternly.

Keep Reading Show less
via Gage Skidmore

The common stereotypes about liberals and conservatives are that liberals are bleeding hearts and conservatives are cold-hearted.

It makes sense, conservatives want limited government and to cut social programs that help the more vulnerable members of society. Whereas liberals don't mind paying a few more dollars in taxes to help the unfortunate.

A recent study out of Belgium scientifically supports the notion that people who scored lower on emotional ability tests tend to have right-wing and racist views.

Keep Reading Show less