10 Years Ago, Some Famous Experts And Execs Were Certain The First iPhone Would Fail

Time has not been kind to iPhone critics.

When the first iPhone debuted to much fanfare and excitement on June 29, 2007, there was nothing like it on the market. Expectations were high, but Apple didn’t really become the juggernaut it is today until it broke into the phone business.

So amid the anticipation of the first iPhone’s debut, there were many esteemed and prominent voices who claimed the iPhone wouldn’t just fail — but would fail miserably.

Of course, the iPhone is arguably the most popular, influential, and thus, “important” consumer electronics product in human history, but it’s still worth our time to revisit some of the loud objections many had to the idea of an Apple phone. The errant predictions don’t just serve as benchmarks of the tech world in 2007, but they also happen to be very fun to mock for just how wildly misguided they were.

Here are just a smattering of the guilty naysayers who will, as long as the iPhone exists, continue to rue their words.

#1. Let’s start with a clearly biased voice: former Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer, who famously said to USA Today, “There's no chance that the iPhone is going to get any significant market share. No chance. It's a $500 subsidized item.”

#2. Another non-neutral party, Jim Balsillie, the CEO of RIM (Blackberry) at the time, predicted, “It’s kind of one more entrant into an already very busy space with lots of choice for consumers. But in terms of a sort of a sea-change for BlackBerry, I would think that’s overstating it.”

In hindsight, calling the iPhone a “disruption” for Blackberry was actually very much an understatement.

#3. Veering slightly out of their lane, Ad Age dogpiled on the iPhone hate as well, offering through Al Reiss, “The iPhone will be a major disappointment ... An iPod is a divergence device; an iPhone is a convergence device. There’s a big difference between the two. In the high-tech world, divergence devices have been spectacular successes. But convergence devices, for the most part, have been spectacular failures.”

#4. Tech Crunch, presumably a publication that knows about these sorts of things, offered a simple take that is fun to read thanks to writer Seth Porges’ brevity. “We predict the iPhone will bomb,” he said. Oops.

#5. Another exec with a stake in Apple’s failure, Palm’s then-CEO Ed Colligan claimed that Apple just didn’t know how to make a quality product like Palm did and that would be their ultimate downfall. He sounds so sure of his opinion of Apple and confident in his own company when he said, “We've learned and struggled for a few years here figuring out how to make a decent phone. PC guys are not going to just figure this out. They’re not going to just walk in.”

Ed Colligan, former CEO of Palm. Photo by Getty Images.

A decade later, the iPhone continues to steamroll its competition, but its detractors still predict that each subsequent version is the beginning of the end of the device’s reign. It hasn’t happened yet, but even if you feel the device’s downfall is just around the corner, these legendary doubters might convince you to keep your prediction off the record.

via Barry Schapiro / Twitter

The phrase "stay in your lane" is usually lobbed at celebrities who talk about politics on Twitter by people who disagree with them. People in the sports world will often get a "stick to sports" when they try to have an opinion that lies outside of the field of play.

Keep Reading

The Free the Nipple movement is trying to remove the stigma on women's breasts by making it culturally acceptable and legal for women to go topless in public. But it turns out, Free the Nipple might be fighting on the wrong front and should be focusing on freeing the nipple in a place you'd never expect. Your own home.

A woman in Utah is facing criminal charges for not wearing a shirt in her house, with prosecutors arguing that women's chests are culturally considered lewd.

Keep Reading

In August, the Recording Academy hired their first female CEO, Deborah Dugan. Ten days before the Grammys, Dugan was placed on administrative leave for misconduct allegations after a female employee said Dugan was "abusive" and created a "toxic and intolerable" work environment. However, Dugan says she was actually removed from her position for complaining to human resources about sexual harassment, pay disparities, and conflicts of interest in the award show's nomination process.

Just five days before the Grammys, Dugan filed a complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and her claims are many. Dugan says she was paid less than former CEO Neil Portnow. In 2018, Portnow received criticism for saying women need to "step up" when only two female acts won Grammys. Portnow decided to not renew his contract shortly after. Dugan says she was also asked to hire Portnow as a consultant for $750,000 a year, which she refused to do.

Keep Reading