GOOD

Have England’s Soccer Bureaucrats Ever Talked To A Girl?

Students are dissing the sport's governing body for its patronizing tips to attract female players

England’s governing body of soccer, the Football Association (commonly known as the FA), wants more girls and women to play the sport. They’re so invested in this mission, in fact, that they recently issued recommendations for increasing participation levels among female athletes with help from the Women’s Sport and Fitness Foundation. While the document seems to be written in good faith, it’s full of generalizing duds of tone-deaf coddling, including such gems as:


- “Use colorful bibs—make sure that they’re clean and smell nice!”

- “Play music alongside participation. You could allow the group to choose their own playlist (as long as it’s suitable!)”

- “Some women/girls are deterred from playing when being watched by men. Consider a venue with limited viewing access.”

- “Allow girls the time to check their phones within a session or incorporate a Twitter break so participants can tweet about the session.”

- “Most of the time, girls only want to participate with other girls. Players with more ability may be willing to play mixed football.”

First of all, teens do not need Twitter breaks. They need Snapchat breaks—just ask a teen. More importantly, that the FA seems to think what’s holding girls back from playing more soccer is the lack of nice-smelling outfits, Adele songs, and protection from boys reveals a lot about how the organization views women’s sports—namely, as something else, something that requires pandering to stereotypes that position a girl’s spot on the field as unlikely or unnatural.

When students at Lumley Junior School near Durham, England, discovered the document, they were offended. As part of a school assignment, girls wrote letters to the FA dissing the list of recommendations.

“I am absolutely astonished that you have the nerve to write all of that absolute rubbish about women and girls playing (soccer),” 10-year-old Nancy wrote. “Your tone of voice sounds as though you think we are brainless baby Barbies!”

Her classmate Grace called out the unnecessary focus on uniforms. “We are not fussy about the smell of our bibs. Would you be?” she asked sarcastically. “And we are not afraid to get hit by a ball, so why would we need light ones—in case we break a nail?”

The school’s deputy head, Carol Hughes, said her boy and girl students were surprised by the casual sexism of the FA’s document. “We kept thinking, what would they write for boys?” Hughes said.

Sports
via David Leavitt / Twitter

Anyone who has ever worked in retail knows that the worst thing about the job, right after the pay, are the unreasonable cheapskates who "want to talk to your manager" to get some money off an item.

They think that throwing a tantrum will save them a few bucks and don't care if they completely embarrass themselves in the process. Sometimes that involves belittling the poor employee who's just trying to get through their day with an ounce of dignity.

Twitter is rallying around a gal named Tori who works at a Target in Massachusetts after she was tweet-shamed by irate chapekate, journalist, and Twitter troll, David Leavitt.

Keep Reading
Business

Childbirth is the number one reason American women visit the hospital, and it ain't cheap. In fact, it's getting more and more expensive. A new study published in Health Affairs found that the cost of having a baby with employer-sponsored health insurance increased by almost 50% in the past seven years.

The study evaluated "trends in cost-sharing for maternity care for women with employer-based health insurance plans, before and after the Affordable Care Act," which was signed into law in 2010. The study looked at over 657,061 women enrolled in large employer-sponsored health insurance plans who delivered babies between 2008 and 2015, as these plans tend to cover more than plans purchased by small businesses or individuals.

Keep Reading
Health

A meteorite crashed into Earth nearly 800,000 years ago. The meteor was 1.2 miles wide, and the impact was so big, it covered 10% of the planet with debris. However, scientists haven't been able to find the impact site for over a century. That is, until now. A study published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences journal believes the crash site has been located.

Tektites, which are essentially rocks that have been liquefied from the heat of the impact and then cooled to form glass, help scientists spot the original impact site of a meteor. Upon impact, melted material is thrown into the atmosphere, then falls back to the ground. Even if the original crater has disappeared due to erosion or is hidden by a shift in tectonic plates, tektites give the spot away. Tektites between 750,000 to 35.5 million years old have been found in every continent except Antarctica.

Keep Reading