In order to celebrate the New York Public Library's 125th anniversary, the library announced a list of the top 10 most checked-out books in the library's history. The list, which took six months to compile, was determined by a team of experts who looked at the "historic checkout and circulation data" for all formats of the book. Ezra Jack Keats's "The Snowy Day" tops the list, having been checked out 485,583 times through June 2019. While many children's books topped the top 10 list, the number one choice is significant because the main character of the story is black. "It's even more amazing that the top-ranked book is a book that has that element of diversity," New York Public Library President Anthony W. Marx said.
RELATED: The women who inspired 'Hidden Figures' will now be honored with Congressional Medals
"The Snowy Day" follows the story of a boy named Peter enjoying the city after the first snowfall. Peter's experience of making snow angels and listening to the crunch of his footprints resonates with young and old alike. "'The Snowy Day" is such a relatable story because snow is an experience all New Yorkers have experienced," Andrew Medlar, one of the experts who helped compile the list, told CNN. It's a small reminder that some experiences, like the magic of winter, are universal.
"The Snowy Day," which was published in 1962 during the Civil Rights movement, was one of the first books to depict a black child without racist stereotypes. However, the book wasn't attempting to make a statement about race. "He said, well, all the books he had ever illustrated, there had never been a child of color, and they're out there � they should be in the books, too," Deborah Pope, executive director of the Ezra Jack Keats Foundation, told NPR. "The Snowy Day" won the 1963 Caldecott Award, making it the first picture book with an African American protagonist to win a major children's award.
The booked also helped change the way some children saw themselves. "There was a teacher [who] wrote into Ezra, saying, 'The kids in my class, for the first time, are using brown crayons to draw themselves.' " Pope told NPR. "These are African-American children. Before this, they drew themselves with pink crayons. But now, they can see themselves."
RELATED: Central Park is finally getting a statue of women and it's about time
Children's books dominated the 10 most checked out books list, partly because they're short. "The shorter the book, the more turnover, or circulation," Medlar said in a statement. "The adult books on the list tend to be shorter, such as 1984 and To Kill a Mockingbird."
Here are the other books on the list:
1. "The Snowy Day," by Ezra Jack Keats (485,583 checkouts)
2. "The Cat in the Hat," by Dr. Seuss (469,650)
3. "1984," by George Orwell (441,770)
4. "Where the Wild Things Are," by Maurice Sendak (436,016)
5. "To Kill a Mockingbird," by Harper Lee (422,912)
6. "Charlotte's Web," by E.B. White (337,948)
7. "Fahrenheit 451," by Ray Bradbury (316,404)
8. "How to Win Friends and Influence People," by Dale Carnegie (284,524)
9. "Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone," by J.K. Rowling (231,022)
Editor's note: This article was originally published on January 14, 2020. It has since been updated.
More on Good.is
New York Public Library's Most Checked-Out Book Is 'The Snowy ...
The New York Public Library has calculated its most checked-out ...
NY Public Library reveals Top 10 borrowed books of all time - New ...
New Yorkers' most checked-out library books by borough
Why Goodnight Moon is missing from the New York Public Library's ...
The 10 Most Checked-Out Books in N.Y. Public Library History - The ...
These Are the Most Frequently Checked-Out Books in the History of ...
New York Public Library's most checked-out books say a lot about ...
Here's New York Public Library's list of the most checked-out books ...
Lazy time with some fast food.Image via 
Child intently watches what you do. 
Family biking on a beautiful day.Image via 
Man finches from pain while rubbing his jawCanva 
A doctor holds a skullCanva 
Hands massage a woman's jaw.Canva
Gif of a human doctor checking a patient
Man in oversized pants.Image via 
Weight loss drugs and tape measure.Image via 
FDA approved. 
A woman deprived of her sleep.Image via 
A Looney Tunes classic. 
Artist's rendering of a brain overlaid a woman's head.Image via 
Ultrasound of human baby.Image via 
IVF animated process.Image via 
A couple speaks with a fertility professional.Image via
Why do some folks use social media but don't engage?
Psychologist says people who never comment on social media share these 5 positive traits
For over 20 years, social media has developed into a staple in many people’s day-to-day lives. Whether it’s to keep in communication with friends and family, following the thoughts of celebrities, or watching cat videos while sipping your morning coffee, there seem to be two types of social media users: commenters and lurkers.
The term “lurker” sounds equally mysterious and insidious, with some social media users writing them off as non-participants at best or voyeurs at worst. However, mindfulness expert Lachlan Brown believes these non-commenters have some very psychologically positive and healthy traits. Let’s take a look at how each one of these traits could be beneficial and see how fruitful lurking might be even though it can drive content creators crazy.
1. Cautious about vulnerability
Consciously or not, making a post online or commenting on one puts you and your words out there. It’s a statement that everyone can see, even if it’s as simple as clicking “like.” Doing so opens yourself up to judgment, with all the good, bad, and potential misinterpretation that comes with it. Non-commenters would rather not open themselves up to that.
These silent users are connected to a concept of self-protection by simply not engaging. By just scrolling past posts or just reading/watching them without commentary, they’re preventing themselves from any downsides of sharing an opinion such as rejection, misunderstanding, or embarrassment. They also have more control on how much of themselves they’re willing to reveal to the general public, and tend to be more open face-to-face or during one-on-one/one-on-few private chats or DMs. This can be seen as a healthy boundary and prevents unnecessary exposure.
Considering many comment sections, especially involving political topics, are meant to stir negative emotional responses to increase engagement, being extra mindful about where, when, and what you comment might not be a bad idea. They might not even take the engagement bait at all. Or if they see a friend of theirs post something vulnerable, they feel more motivated to engage with them personally one-on-one rather than use social media to publicly check in on them.
2. Analytical and reflective mindset
How many times have you gone onto Reddit, YouTube, or any other site and just skimmed past comments that are just different versions of “yes, and,” “no, but,” or “yes, but”? Or the ever insightful, formerly popular comment “First!” in a thread? These silent browsers lean against adding to such noise unless they have some valid and thoughtful contribution (if they bother to comment period).
These non-posters are likely wired on reflective thinking rather than their initial intuition. Not to say that all those who comment aren’t thoughtful, but many tend to react quickly and comment based on their initial feelings rather than absorbing the information, thinking it over, researching or testing their belief, and then posting it. For "lurkers," it could by their very nature to just do all of that and not post it at all, or share their thoughts and findings privately with a friend. All in all, it’s a preference of substance over speed.
3. High sense of self-awareness
Carried over from the first two listed traits, these silent social media users incorporate their concern over their vulnerability and their reflective mindset into digital self-awareness. They know what triggers responses out of them and what causes them to engage in impulsive behavior. It could be that they have engaged with a troll in the past and felt foolish. Or that they just felt sad after a post or got into an unnecessary argument that impacted them offline. By knowing themselves and seeing what’s being discussed, they choose to weigh their words carefully or just not participate at all. It’s a form of self-preservation through restraint.
4. Prefer to observe rather than perform
Some folks treat social media as information, entertainment, or a mix of both, and commenting can feel like they’re yelling at the TV, clapping alone in a movie theater when the credits roll, or yelling “That’s not true!” to a news anchor that will never hear them. But contrary to that, social media is a place where those yells, claps, and accusations can be seen and get a response. By its design, social media is considered by experts and the media as performative, regardless of whether it is positive or negative. Taking all of the previously mentioned traits into account, one can see why they would prefer to “observe the play” rather than get up on the stage of Facebook or X.
On top of that, these non-commenters could be using social media differently than those who choose to fully engage with it. Using this type of navigation, there may be nothing for them to comment about. Some commenters are even vying for this for their mental health. There are articles about how to better curate your social media feeds and manipulate algorithms to create a better social media experience to avoid unnecessary conflict or mentally tiring debate.
If you go on a blocking spree on all of your accounts and just follow the posters that boost you, it could turn your social media into a nice part of your routine as you mainly engage with others face-to-face or privately. In terms of commenting, if your curated Instagram is just following cute dogs and all you have to offer for a comment is “cute dog,” you might just enjoy the picture and then move on with your day rather than join in the noise. These non-commenters aren’t in the show and they’re fine with it.
5. Less motivated by social validation
The last trait that Brown showcases is that social media users who browse without posting tend to be independent from external validation, at least online. Social media is built to grow through feedback loops such as awarding likes, shares, and reposts of your content along with notifications letting you know that a new person follows you or wants to connect. This can lead many people to connect their activity on social media with their sense of self worth, especially with adolescents who are still figuring out their place in the world and have still-developing brains.
Engaging in social media via likes, shares, comments, and posts rewards our brains by having them release dopamine, which makes us feel good and can easily become addictive. For whatever reason, non-commenters don’t rely on social media as a means to gauge their social capital or self worth. This doesn’t make them better than those who do. While some non-commenters could have healthier ways to boost their self worth or release dopamine into their systems, many get that validation from equally unhealthy sources offline. That said, many non-commenters’ silence could be a display of independence and self confidence.
Whether you frequently comment online or don’t, it’s good to understand why you do or don’t. Analyzing your habits can help you determine whether your online engagement is healthy, or needs to be tweaked. With that information, you can then create a healthy social media experience that works for you.